Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1890 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Fitzgerald & Mallory Construction Co. v. Fitzgerald
FITZGERALD AND MALLORY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. FITZGERALD. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 1141. Submitted October 28, 1890. Decided November 17, 1890. Where jurisdiction has been obtained b
Seeberger v. Cahn
SEEBERGER v. CAHN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 47. Argued November 3, 1890. Decided November 17, 1890. Cloths popularly known as “ diagonals,” and known in trade as worsteds,” a
The Max Morris
THE MAX MORRIS: Morris, Claimant. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 44. Submitted May 2, 1890. Decided November 17, 1890. Where a person is injured on a vessel, through a marine to
Texas Land & Cattle Co. v. Scott
TEXAS LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY v. SCOTT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 1471. Submitted November 3, 1890. Decided November 10, 1890. Motion papers should contain enough of the record to
Crowley v. Christensen
CROWLEY v. CHRISTENSEN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1317. Submitted October 28, 1890. Decided November 10, 1890. The sale of spirituous and intoxicating liquors by retail a
Hennessy v. Bacon
HENNESSY v. BACON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 1103. Submitted October 21, 1890. Decided November 10, 1890. If me party to a contract intends to rescind it on the ground of failure o
Florsheim v. Schilling
FLORSHEIM v. SCHILLING. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 23. Argued October 21, 22, 1890. Decided November 10, 1890. The claims in letters patent No. 238,100 granted to Simon Flor
In re Huntington
IN RE HUNTINGTON, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. Not numbered. Submitted October 27, 2890. Decided November 3, 1890. On the authority of Ex parte Mirzan, 119 U. S. 584, the court denies a petition for leave to file a petition for a writ of habeas co
La Confiance Compagnie Anonyme D'Assurance v. Hall
LA CONFIANCE COMPAGNIE ANONYME D’ASSURANCE v. HALL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 11. Argued and submitted October 21, 1890. Decided November 3, 1890. In a petition for the removal
Fishburn v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
FISHBURN v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 42. Argued October 31, 1890. Decided November 3, 1890. In regard to motions for new tria
Shenfield v. Nashawannuck Manufacturing Co.
SHENFIELD v. NASHAWANNUCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE NEW YORK. No. 19. Argued October 21, 1890. Decided November 3, 1890. In view of the previous condition of the a
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 1210. Submitted October 21, 1890. Decided November 3, 1890. A title, right, privilege or immunity under the Constitutio
Harding v. Woodcock
HARDING v. WOODCOCK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 29. Argued and submitted October 22, 1890. Decided November 3, 1890. The due aud regular assessment of a distiller’s' tax by an i
Dable Grain Shovel Co. v. Flint
DABLE GRAIN SHOVEL COMPANY v. FLINT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 1213. Submitted October 21, 1890. Decided November 3, 1890. The act of March 3, 1839, c. 88, § 7, authorized per
Hostetter v. Park
HOSTETTER v. PARK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 3. Argued and submitted October 21, 1890. Decided November 3, 1890. .A bill of lading for goods shipped at Pittsburg for New
Butler v. Steckel
BUTLER v. STECKEL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 36. Argued October 24, 1890. Decided November 3, 1890. The claims of letters patent No. 274,264, granted to Theodore H. Butler,
York v. Texas
YORK v. TEXAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 999. Submitted October 21, 1890. Decided November 3, 1890. The provisions in .the Revised Statutes of Texas, Articles 1242-1245, which, as construed by the highest court o
Washington Market Co. v. District of Columbia
WASHINGTON MARKET COMPANY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 10. Submitted October 21, 1890. Decided October 27, 1890. The court dismisses without costs to either party an appeal, the sub
Smith v. States
No. 1142, and No. 1144, Edward Smith v. United States, George S. Key v. United States,
Thaw v. Ritchie
THAW v. RITCHIE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 264. Argued April 15, 16, 1890. — Decided May 23, 1890. Under tbe statute of Maryland of 1798, c. 101, sub-ch. 12, § 10, the orphans’ court of the District of Colu
In re Kemmler
IN RE KEMMLER, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No. 13. Original. Argued May 20,1890. — Decided May 23, 1890. Ex parte Mirzan, 119 U. S. 584, affirmed and applied. A writ oí error to the highest court oX a State is not allowed as of right, arid ought
Saloy v. Bloch
SALOY v. BLOCH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 92. Argued December 18, 19, 1889. — Decided May 23, 1890. Saloy, being the owner of a plantation in Louisiana, leased it to P. B-Drag
In re Cortes
IN RE LUIS OTEIZA y CORTES, Petitioner. APPEAL EROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE NEW YORK. No. 1631. Argued May 20, 1890. — Decided May 23, 1890. A writ of habeas corpus in a case, of extradition canno
Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States
THE LATE CORPORATION OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS v. UNITED STATES. ROMNEY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. Nos. 695, 715. Decided May 19, 1890. Reported 136 U. S. 1. Decree en
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.