Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1890 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
McCall v. California
McCALL v. CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1190. Submitted October 28, 1889. — Decided May 19, 1890. ■ An agency of a line of railroad between Chicago and New York, es
Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.
KNEELAND v. AMERICAN LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY. KNEELAND v. BALLOU. APPEALS EEOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. Nos. 252, 1537. Argued April 3, 7, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. A party bidding at a foreclos
Ryan v. United States
RYAN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT. OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 1307. Submitted April 21, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. The facts stated by the court constituted a valid contract, mutually b
Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States
THE LATE CORPORATION OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS v. UNITED STATES. ROMNEY v. UNITED STATES Nos. 1031, 1054. Argued January 10, 17, 18, 1889 -Decided May 19, 1890. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints was in
McGahey v. Virginia
McGAHEY v. VIRGINIA. BRYAN v. VIRGINIA. COOPER v. VIRGINIA. ELLETT v. VIRGINIA. CUTHBERT v. VIRGINIA. IN RE BROWN. HUCLESS v. CHILDREY. VASHON v. GREENHOW. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRC
Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.
CHEROKEE NATION v. SOUTHERN KANSAS RAILWAY COMPANY APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 664. Argued March 12, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. The act of Congress of July 4, 1884, 23 Stat.
Riddle v. Whitehill
RIDDLE v. WHITEHILL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 314. Submitted May 1, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. The right of one partner to have the affairs of the firm wound up at once, u
Farrar v. Churchill
FARRAR v. CHURCHILL. CHURCHILL v. FARRAR. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. Nos. 266, 603. Argued April 16, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. Cross-appeals in equity must be prosecuted l
The Steamer Eclipse
THE STEAMER ECLIPSE, BRAITHWAITE, Claimant. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF DAKOTA. No. 310. Argued April 29, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. A court of admiralty has no equity power to wind up a trust concerning a licensed ve
Haines v. McLaughlin
HAINES v. McLAUGHLIN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 315. Argued May 1, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. The invention covered by the claim in letters patent No. 107,611, granted to J
Des Moines & Fort Dodge Railroad v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.
DES MOINES AND FORT DODGE RAILROAD COMPANY v. WABASH, ST. LOUIS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE .CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 256. Argued April 11, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. A cont
Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. McDade
WASHINGTON & GEORGETOWN RAILROAD COMPANY v. McDADE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 137. Argued December 2, 3, 1889. Decided May 19, 1890 An employer of labor in connection -with machinery is not bound to insure
United States v. Voorhees
UNITED STATES v. VOORHEES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 282. Argued April 18, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. An extra allowance to a contractor for carrying the’ mail», under the provisions
Glenn v. Liggett
GLENN v. LIGGETT. GLENN v. TAUSSIG. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Nos. 306, 307. Argued April 29, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. A writ of error, the citation and the bond, all of them we
Robinson v. Iron Railway Co.
ROBINSON v. IRON RAILWAY CO. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 324. Submitted May 1, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. A bill in equity was filed by the holder of second mortgage bonds of á
West v. Camden
WEST v. CAMDEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. No. 278. Argued April 17, 18, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. An agreement by a director of a corporation to keep another person permanently in place
Norman v. Buckner
NORMAN v. BUCKNER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 275. Argued April 16, 17, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. • In Louisiana, where the heirs of an intestate may take the property and
Detroit v. Osborne
DETROIT v. OSBORNE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 295. Argued April 28, 29, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. It is settled law in Michigan that the failure of a municipal corporation to
Anderson v. Carkins
ANDERSON v. CARKINS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 322. Argued May 1, 2, 1890. Decided May 19, 1890. In decreeing specific performance of a contract for tbe conveyance of a ■ tract of land in a suit’where the defe
New York Elevated Railroad v. Fifth National Bank
NEW YORK ELEVATED RAILROAD COMPANY v. FIFTH NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 106. Argued November 13, 1889. Decided May 5, 1890. A party cannot take exception to a rul
In re Baiz
IN RE BAIZ, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No. 11. Original. Argued March 31, April 1, 1890. Decided May 5, 1890. The Consul General of Guatemala and Honduras in New York, being a citizen of and resident in the United States, was accredited by the g
Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. Berkshire National Bank
YALE LOCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. BERKSHIRE NATIONAL BANK. BERKSHIRE NATIONAL BANK v. YALE LOCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE’ UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 261, 262. Argued April 11,
Mansfield v. Excelsior Refining Co.
MANSFIELD v. EXCELSIOR REFINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT .COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 239. Argued and submitted March 28, 1890. Decided May 5, 1890. In Illinois, the unsuccessful party in an ac
Royer v. Schultz Belting Co.
ROYER v. SCHULTZ BELTING CO. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 228. Argued April 22, 23, 1890. Decided May 5, 1890. At the trial of an action at law for the infringement of a patent, t
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.