Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1890 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
In re Burrus
IN RE BURRUS, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No. 10. Original. Submitted March 10, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. A District Court of the United States has no authority in law to issue a writ of habeas coijpus to restore an infant to the custody of i
Mason v. United States
MASON v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 214. Submitted May 5, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. A postmaster and the sureties on his official bopd being sued jointly for
Gibbons v. Mahon
GIBBONS v. MAHON. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 16. Argued December 19, 20, 1888. — Decided May 19, 1890. Under a will bequeathing stock in a corporation and government bonds, in trust to pay “ the dividends
Indiana v. Kentucky
INDIANA v. KENTUCKY. ORIGINAL. No. 2. Original. Argued April 9,10, 1890, — Decided May 19, 1890. The waters of the Ohio River, when Kentucky became a State, flowed in a channel north of the tract known as Green River Island, and the jurisdi
Stevens v. Fuller
STEVENS v. FULLER APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 1617. Submitted May 5, 1890. - Decided May 19, 1890. On a body execution issued against a debtor on a judgment in the Circuit Court
District of Columbia v. Woodbury
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. WOODBURY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 234. Argued Marcia 27, 28, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. The municipal corporation called the District of Columbia, created by the act of June 11,
Richelieu & Ontario Navigation Co. v. Boston Marine Insurance
RICHELIEU AND ONTARIO NAVIGATION COMPANY v. BOSTON MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 296. Argued April 25, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. Where a policy of mar
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Marshall
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MARSHALL. MARSHALL v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE' UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. Nos. 293, 1105. Argued April 23, 24, 1890. — Decided May 1
Norris v. Haggin
NORRIS v. HAGGIN. appeal from the circuit court of the united states for THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 333. Submitted May 2, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. A plaintiff wlio delays for fifteen years after an alleged fraud comes to his knowl
Nashua & Lowell Railroad v. Boston & Lowell Railroad
NASHUA AND LOWELL RAILROAD CORPORATION v. BOSTON AND LOWELL RAILROAD CORPORATION. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 166. Argued December, 16, 17, 1889; March 31, 1890. —Decided May 19,
Reynolds v. Adden
REYNOLDS v. ADDEN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT- COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR’ THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 153. Submitted December 10, 1889. — Decided May 19, 1890. ■3. H. A. resides in Reading in Massachusetts. J. A., his father, w
Minnesota v. Barber
MINNESOTA v. BARBER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED 'STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 1346. Argued January 14, 15, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. The statute of. Minnesota approved April 16, 1889, entitled “ an act for
Allen v. Hanks
ALLEN v. HANKS. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 316. Submitted April 30, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. A and B intermarried in Arkansas in 1859, during -which year a child was bo
Thompson v. Phenix Insurance
THOMPSON v. PHENIX INSURANCE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 311. Argued April 29, 30, 1890. — DecidedMay 19, 1890. Under some circumstances a receiver would be derelict in duty if
Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' Bank
CHICAGO RAILWAY EQUIPMENT COMPANY v. MERCHANTS’ BANK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 64. Argued November 4, 5, 1889. — DecidedMay 19, 1890. "The maker executed in the State of Illi
In re Palliser
IN RE PALLISER. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 1538. Argued May 1, 1890.— Decided May 19, 1890. A sale by a postmaster of postage stamps on credit is a violation of the act of J
Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance
HAMILTON v. LIVERPOOL, LONDON AND GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE OHIO. No. 326. Argued May 2, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. A condition in a policy of fire insurance, th
Smith Middlings Purifier Co. v. McGroarty
SMITH MIDDLINGS PURIFIER COMPANY v. McGROARTY. APPEAL FEOM THE CIRCUIT OOUBT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 28. Argued April 15, 16, 1889.— Decided May 19, 1890. An appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court of t
Union Bank v. Kansas City Bank
UNION BANK OF CHICAGO v. KANSAS CITY BANK APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OE MISSOURI. No. 13. Argued October 16, 17, 1889. — Decided May 19, 1890. Upon appeal from a decree in equity of the Circu
United States v. North Carolina
UNITED STATES v. NORTH CAROLINA. ORIGINAL. No. 3. Original. Argued April 2, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. A State is not liable to pay interest on its debts, unless its consent to do so has been manifested by an act of its legislature, or b
Cornell University v. Fiske
CORNELL UNIVERSITY v. FISKE. error to the supreme court of the STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 1224. Argued April 8, 9, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. ;Under the will of a testatrix who resided in New York, Cornell University, a corporation of that S
Lovell v. Cragin
LOVELL v. CRAGIN. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 212. Argued March 12, 13, 1890. — DecidedMay 19, 1890. When the matter set up in a cross-bill is directly responsive to the aver
Hot Springs Railroad v. Williamson
HOT SPRINGS RAILROAD COMPANY v. WILLIAMSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 93. Submitted November 11, 1889. — Decided May 19, 1890. The refusal of the court below to grant the defendant’s request to charge upon a q
Norfolk & Western Railroad v. Pennsylvania
NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF.THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 294. Argued April 24, 25, 1890. — Decided May 19, 1890. A railroad which is a link in a through line of road by which passeng
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.