Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1890 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
In re Neagle
IN RE NEAGLE, Petitioner. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1472. Argued March 4, 5, 1890. Decided April 14, 1890. An appeal from the decision of a Circuit Court of the United St
Leavenworth County Commissioners v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
LEAVENWORTH COUNTY COMMISSIONERS v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FBOM THE CIECUIT COUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE WESTEEN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 251. Argued April 3, 1890. Decided April 14, 1890. A consolid
Rich v. Mentz Township
RICH v. MENTZ TOWNSHIP. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OR THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 229. Argued March 25, 1890. Decided April 14, 1890. Where a majority of the taxpayers of a town are authorized by statute to
United States v. Lacher
UNITED STATES v. LACHER. CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION IN OPINION FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW •YORK. No. 654. Submitted March 28, 1890. Decided April 14, 1890. Section 6467 of the Revised Statutes
Kingsbury v. Buckner
KINGSBURY v. BUCKNER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE. UNITED STATES FOE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT Of' ILLINOIS. No. 176. Argued January 8, 9, 1890. Decided April 7, 1890. In Illinois, a decree against a minor is subject to attack, by an o
Giles v. Little
GILES v. LITTLE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 1384. Argued March 17, 1890. Decided April 7, 1890. The disregard hy the highest court of a State of' an opinion of this court in another case, in which no judgment h
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Woodson
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. WOODSON. ERROR TO TH3Í SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 1182. Submitted March 24, 1890. Decided April 7, 1890. The statute of Tennessee which provides that “ not more than two new tri
Blount v. Walker
BLOUNT v. WALKER. EEROB TO THE SUPEEME COUET CE THE STATE OE SOUTH GASOLINA. No. 1399. Submitted March 24, 1890. Decided April 7, 1890. A judgment by a state court of South Carolina that the will of a resident in North Carolina, who was the
Home Insurance v. New York State
HOME INSURANCE COMPANY v. NEW YORK STATE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF HEW YORK. No. 1. Argued March 18, 19, 1890. Decided April 7, 1890. A tax which is imposed by a state statute upon “ the corporate franchise or business ” o
Lee v. Simpson
LEE v. SIMPSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCÜIT COURT OF' THE ' UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH. CAROLINA. No. 1418. Submitted March 17, 1890, -with leave to appellant to file reply-brief in ten days. — Decided April 7, 1890. A testatrix, r
Mendenhall v. Hall
MENDENHALL v. HALL. APPEAL FROM' THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA'. No. 158. Submitted by appellant, December 13, 1889; by appellee, March 24, 1890. Decided April 7, 1890. When one of two defendan
Little v. Bowers
LITTLE v. BOWERS. ERROR TO THE- OOURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS- OF THE STATE. OF ’ NEW JERSEY,' No. 194. Argued on the m'erits January 30, 1800.. Motion to dismiss submitted March 3, 1890. Decided April 7, 1890. ■The voluntary payment of a mun
Wheeler v. Cloyd
WHEELER v. CLOYD. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 147. Argued December 6, 1889. Decided April 7, 1890. Gibson v. Shufeldt; 122 U. S. 27, affirmed to the point that “in a suit in
Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co.
BROWN v. LAKE SUPERIOR IRON COMPANY. APPEAL EEOM THE OIBOUIT COUBT . OF THE HOTTED STATES FOE THE NOETHEEN DISTBIOT OF OHIO. No. 227. Argued and submitted March 24, 1890. Decided April 7, 1890. An insolvent corporation, with large propertie
Burns v. Rosenstein
BURNS v. ROSENSTEIN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 207. Argued March 18, 1890. Decided March 31, 1890. The plaintiffs filed a bill in equity to dissolve a copartnership with the de
Whittemore v. Amoskeag National Bank
WHITTEMORE v. AMOSKEAG NATIONAL BANK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR-, THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. No. 219. Argued and submitted March 20, 1890. Decided March 31, 1890. In an action against a national bank in a Ci
Hill v. Merchants' Mutual Insurance
HILL v. MERCHANTS’ MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OE MISSOURI. No. 215. Submitted March 19, 1890. Decided March 31, 1890. A state statute -which confers upon a judgment 'creditor of a corporation,, when ex
Small v. Northern Pacific Railroad
SMALL v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FEOM THE CIECUIT OOUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTEICT OF’ MINNESOTA. No. 226. Submitted March 21, 1890. Decided March 31, 1890. When the record is not filed in this court at the term
Elwell v. Fosdick
ELWELL v. FOSDICK. APPEAL FROM THE OIRCUIT COÜRT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 216. Argued March 19, 20, 1890. Decided March 31, 1890. The holder of $14,000 out of $955,000 of .railroad bonds secured by a m
Hathaway v. First National Bank of Cambridge
HATHAWAY v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CAMBRIDGE. ERROR TÓ THE OIROUIT COURT'QF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ■ district of Massachusetts. No. 223. Argued March 20, 21, 1890. Decided March 31, 1890. Where a case is tried by the Circuit Court withou
In re the Louisville Underwriters
IN RE THE LOUISVILLE UNDERWRITERS, Petitioners. ORIGINAL. No. 8. Original. Argued March 10, 1890. Decided March 31, 1890. The provision of the Aqt of March 3, 1887, c. 373, § 1, 2.4 Stat. 552, that “ no civil'suit” shall he brought before a
United States v. Jones
UNITED STATES v. JONES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 1554. Submitted March 3, 1890. Decided March 24, 1890. The decision of a commissioner of a Circuit Court of the United States upon'a motion for bail and the sufficiency thereof, a
Minneapolis Eastern Railway Co. v. Minnesota
MINNEAPOLIS EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. MINNESOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 1113. Argued January 13, 14, 1890. Decided March 24, 1890. The case of Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. State of Minne-
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minnesota
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. MINNESOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE MINNESOTA. No. 762. Argued January 13, 14, 1890. Decided March 24, 1890. The act of the legislature of Minnesota, approved March 7, 188
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.