Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1890 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Austin
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. AUSTIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 289. Submitted April 22, 1890. Decided May 5, 1890. An amendment to a complaint in an action pending in a state court, allowed by the cou
Willard v. Wood
WILLARD v. WOOD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 286. Argued April 22, 1890. Decided May 5, 1890. The question -whether the remedy of a mortgagee against a grantee of the mortgagor, to enforce an agreement of suc
Société Foncière et Agricole des États Unis v. Milliken
SOCIÉTÉ FONCIÈRE ET AGRICOLE DES ÉTATS UNIS v. MILLIKEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCIUT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 274. Submitted April 16, 1890. Decided May 5, 1890. Section 1373, Rev. Stats. Texas, authorizes
In re Lane
IN RE LANE, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No. 12. Original. Argued April 15, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. This court can issue a writ of habeas corpus in the exercise of its original jurisdiction only when the inferior court has acted without juri
Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Campbell
IRON SILVER MINING COMPANY v. CAMPBELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 22. Argued March 25, 26, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. A lode patent, issued .subsequently to the issue of a placer pa
United States v. Sanborn
UNITED STATES v. SANBORN. SANBORN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 224, 225. Argued March 21, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. The payment made by the United States to Sa
In re Mills
IN RE MILLS, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No. 4. Original. Submitted April 3, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. The words “ punishable by imprisonment at hard labor” in the act of March 1, 1889, 25 Stat. 783, c. 333, “ to establish a United States cou
United States v. Chase
UNITED STATES v. CHASE. CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION IN OPINION FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 241. Argued March 28, 31, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. The knowingly-depositing an obscene letter
Beatty v. Benton
BEATTY v. BENTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 279. Submitted April 18, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. In this case, on a writ of error to review the judgment of the Supreme Court of a State, it was held that no fe
Eckloff v. District of Columbia
ECKLOFF v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 244. Submitted March 27, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. Under the act of June 11, 1878, 20 Stat. 102, c. 180, the commissioners of the District of C
Hartranft v. Meyer
HARTRANFT v. MEYER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 148. Argued April 18, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. Cloth composed partly of silk, partly of cotton and partly of wool, silk b
Lodge v. Twell
LODGE v. TWELL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF MONTANA. No. 284. Submitted April 18, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. A decree in equity setting aside a conveyance of pérsonait^- and Of real estate as fraudulently made to hi
St. Germain v. Brunswick
ST. GERMAIN v. BRUNSWICK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 257. Argued and submitted April 11, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. The application of an old process, or machine or apparatus to
Lyng v. Michigan
LYNG v. MICHIGAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 1219. Submitted March 19, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. Following Leisy v. Hardin, ante, 100, the judgment of the court below in this case is reversed. Plaintiff in
Leisy v. Hardin
LEISY v. HARDIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 1459. Submitted January 6, 1890. Decided April 28, 1890. A statute of a State, prohibiting the sale of any intoxicating liquors, except for pharmaceutical, medicinal, che
Central Trust Co. v. Grant Locomotive Works
CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY v. GRANT LOCOMOTIVE WORKS. DAYTON, FORT WAYNE AND CHICAGO RAILROAD COMPANY v. GRANT LOCOMOTIVE WORKS. CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY v. GRANT. DAYTON, FORT WAYNE AND CHICAGO RAILROAD COMPANY v. GRANT. CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY v. G
United States ex rel. Miller v. Raum
UNITED STATES ex rel. MILLER v. RAUM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 1572. Submitted April 7, 1890. Decided April 21, 1890. When the Commissioner of-Pensions, -in executing an instruction from the Secretary of t
Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad v. Smith
VICKSBURG, SHREVEPORT AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 276. Submitted April 11, 1890. Decided April 21, 1890. A suit was brought to recover fro
Commercial Manufacturing Co. v. Fairbank Canning Co.
COMMERCIAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. FAIRBANK CANNING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 253. Argued and submitted April 11, 1890. Decided April 21, 1890. Reissued letters
Mackall v. Mackall
MACKALL v. MACKALL. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 159. Argued April 1, 2, 1890. Decided April 21, 1890. A bill in equity was filed to set aside a deed made to one' of his sons by the grantor as made under un
Davenport v. Paris
DAVENPORT v. PARIS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 268. Submitted April 8, 1890. — Decided April 14, 1890. Glenn v. Fant, 134 U. S. 398; Raimond v. Terrebonne Parish, 132 U. S. 192
Freiburg v. Dreyfus
FREIBURG v. DREYFUS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 228. Argued March 24, 25, 1890. Decided April 14, 1890. D., a resident at New Orleans, being at the time insolvent, transferr
Upshur County v. Rich
UPSHUR COUNTY v. RICH. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 81. Submitted November 7, 1889. Decided April 14, 1890. An appeal, under a state law,, from an assessment of taxes to “ a-; cou
Randolph's Executor v. Quidnick Co.
RANDOLPH’S EXECUTOR v. QUIDNICK COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. No. 213. Argued March 13, 14, 1890. Decided April 14, 1890. A court of equity will not lend its aid to enforce a s
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.