Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1892 Cases
260 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
McDonald v. Belding
McDonald v. BELDING. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP ARKANSAS, No. 379. Submitted April 26, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. In Arkansas, although the rule obtains that a person holding under a quit
Baker's Executors v. Kilgore
BAKER’S EXECUTORS v. KILGORE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 322. Argued and submitted April 20, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. The act of the legislature of Tennessee of March 26, 1879, c. 141, providing that “ the
Matthews v. Warner
MATTHEWS v. WARNER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR-THE DISTRICT OF ' MASSACHUSETTS. ’ No. 250. Argued March 28, 29, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. N. M. was indebted, to U. in the. sum of $200,000 secured by railroad bo
Franklin Telegraph Co. v. Harrison
FRANKLIN TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. HARRISON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE .EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 319. Argued April 19, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. A telegraph company gave to'.H. & Co.- the right to
Brown v. Smart
BROWN v. SMART. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEAÍS OP THE STATE OP MARYLAND. No. 163. Submitted January 18, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. An insolvent law of a' State, providing that any conveyance of property within the State, made by a citizen o
Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.
SHAW v. QUINCY MINING COMPANY. ORIGINAL. No. 13. Original. Argued March 8, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. Under the act of March 3, 1887, c. 373, § 1, as corrected by the act- of August 13, 1888, c. 866, a corporation, incorporated in one Stat
Kissam v. Anderson
KISSAM v. ANDERSON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 202. Argued March 11, 14, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. The 3d National Bank in New York was the correspondent of the Albion Bank,
Benson Mining & Smelting Co. v. Alta Mining & Smelting Co.
BENSON MINING AND SMELTING COMPANY v. ALTA MINING AND SMELTING COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE_ SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 347. Argued and submitted April 28, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. When the judgment in the Supreme Court o
Miller v. Ammon
MILLER v. AMMON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 283. Argued April 11, 12, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. The Supreme Court of Illinois having held Jhat the ordinance of the city of Chicag
Aerkfetz v. Humphreys
AERKFETZ v. HUMPHREYS. error to the circuit court of the united states eor the EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 355. Submitted April 29, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. The obligation upon an employé of a- railroad company to take care and exe
Hancock v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
HANCOCK v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. SHELBY RAILROAD COMPANY v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEALS • PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP KENTUCKY. Nos. 325, 326. Argued April 21, 22,
St. Louis, Vandalia & Terre Haute Railroad v. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad
ST. LOUIS, VANDALIA AND TERRE HAUTE RAILROAD COMPANY v. TERRE HAUTE AND INDIANAPOLIS RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TH-E UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOI? No. 42. Argued April 24, 27, 28, 1891. Decided
Cox v. Hart
COX v. HART. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 828. Submitted January 4, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. The granting or refusing of an application for continuance by the court below is not
Galliher v. Cadwell
GALLIHER v. CADWELL. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OE THE TERRITORY OE WASHINGTON. No. 265. Argued April 1, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. Laches does no.t, like limitation, grow out of the mere passage of time; but it is founded upon the ineq
Pewabic Mining Co. v. Mason
PEWABIC MINING COMPANY v. MASON. MARCUS v. MASON. APPEALS EROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OE MICHIGAN. Nos. 1340, 1416. Argued March 16, 17, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. When a sale of property is cleoree
The Corsair
THE CORSAIR. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE .UNITED STATES FOR THE 'EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 344. Submitted April 26, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. Admiralty rules 12 to 20 inclusive allow, in certain cases, a joinder of ship
Felix v. Patrick
FELIX v. PATRICK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA, No. 301. Argued April 14, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. P., a half-breed of the.Sioux nation, received in 1857 a certificate of land-scrip unde
Pickering v. Lomax
PICKERING v. LOMAX. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 342. Argued and submitted April 27, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. The treaty of Prairie du Chien, 7 Stat. 320, made grants of lands to certain Indians, upon conditio
Hoyt v. Horne
HOYT v. HORNE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ' MASSACHUSETTS. No. 336. Argued April 26, 27, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. The machine manufactured under letters patent No. 347,043, issued August 10, 18
South Spring Hill Gold Mining Co. v. Amador Medean Gold Mining Co.
SOUTH SPRING HILL GOLD MINING COMPANY v. AMADOR MEDEAN GOLD MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF . THE UNITED- STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. ■ No. 338. Submitted April 27, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. The court, be
Mutual Life Insurance v. Hillmon
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HILLMON. MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HILLMON. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HILLMON. CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HILLMON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF' THE UNITED STATES FOR THE D
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT'OF OHIO. No. 889. Argued March 17, 18, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. The issue by a railway co
Earnshaw v. Cadwalader
EARNSHAW v. CADWALADER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 348. Argued April 29, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. Under schedule C of § 2502 of the Revised'Statutes, as enacted by § 6 of
Ryan v. Hard
RYAN v. HARD. APPEAL PRÓM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED" STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 346. Argued April 28, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. Letters patent No. 241,321, granted May 10,1881, to Charles H. Dunks and James B.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.