Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1892 Cases
260 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pendleton v. Russell
PENDLETON v. RUSSELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 236. Argued and submitted March 24, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. Four children of S. H. P., deceased, recovered judgment in the Circuit Court of the United Stat
White v. Rankin
WHITE v. RANKIN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT ' COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF .CALIFORNIA. No. 259. Argued and submitted March 30, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. A bill in equity for. the infringement of letters patent f
Crotty v. Union Mutual Life Insurance
CROTTY v. UNION MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 248. Argued March 28, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. A promise by the insurer in a policy of life ins
Nesbit v. Riverside Independent District
NESBIT v. RIVERSIDE INDEPENDENT DISTRICT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA.. No. 212. Submitted March 15, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. When the constitution of a State forbids “ county, poli
Robertson v. Salomon
ROBERTSON v. SALOMON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 272. Argued April 4, 5, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. Elastic webbings, used as gorings for shoes, some composed of worsted aft
Meyerheim v. Robertson
MEYERHEIM v. ROBERTSON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED'STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 279. Argued April 5, 6, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. Laces made by machinery out of linen thread were imported in 1881 and 1
Crawford v. Neal
CRAWFORD v. NEAL. NEAL v. CRAWFORD. APPEALS EROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CHE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Nos. 186, 278. Argued March 21, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. The jurisdiction of a Federal court hy reason of diverse citiz
Windett v. Union Mutual Life Insurance
WINDETT v. UNION MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 253. Argued March 31, April 1, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. If a mortgagor, who has agreed by the
Brown v. Massachusetts
BROWN v. MASSACHUSETTS. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 839. Argued April 6, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. A defendant indicted in a state court for’forging discharges for money payable by a municipal corporat
National Exchange Bank v. Peters
NATIONAL EXCHANGE BANK OF BALTIMORE v. PETERS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 1369. Submitted April 4, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. The Judiciary Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat.
Ficklen v. Shelby County Taxing District
FICKLEN v. SHELBY COUNTY TAXING DISTRICT. ERROR 'TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE TENNESSEE. No. 97. Argued March 18, 21, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. í1. and C. & Co. were commercial agents or b/okers, having an office in Shelby Count
United States ex rel. Jones v. County Court
UNITED STATES ex rel. JONES v. COUNTY COURT OF MACON COUNTY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 257. Argued March 29, 30, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. The judgment below is affirmed up
Stellwagen v. Tucker
Stellwagen v. Tucker. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia. No. 217. Argued March 15, 16, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. Mr. O. J. Hillyer and Mr. J. H. Ralston for appellants. Mr. JEppa Hunton and Mr. Henry Wise Garnett
Sharon v. Tucker
SHARON v. TUCKER. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 216. Argued March 15, 16, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. Adverse possession 6f real estate' in the District of Columbia, for the period designated by the Statut
Torrence v. Shedd
TORRENCE v. SHEDD. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE -UNITED STATES EOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OE ILLINOIS. No. 244. Argued March 25, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. A suit in a state court for partition of land cannot be removed into- the
Smith v. Gale
SMITH v. GALE. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP DAKOTA. No. 225. Argued March 23, 24, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. The-right to intervene in a cause, conferred by secs. 89, 90 of the Dakota Code of Civil Procedure upon a p
Belford v. Scribner
BELFORD v. SCRIBNER. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE . NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 226. Submitted March 24, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. In. an equity suit for the infringement of a copyright, where the de
Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co. v. Blake
CHATEAUGAY ORE AND IRON COMPANY v. BLAKE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 189. Argued March 4, 7, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. B. contracted with C. to construct and put up for him
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Amato
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. AMATO. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1508. Submitted February 29, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. A suit was brought in the Supreme Court of New York again
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Ellis
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. ELLIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 1495. Submitted March 28, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. A decision by the bigbest court of a State that a former judgment of the same cour
Dodge v. Tulleys
DODGE v. TULLEYS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 222. Argued and submitted March 22, 23, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. Interest at the rate of 8| per cent in Nebraska is not usurious. Th
Isaacs v. Jonas
ISAACS v. JONAS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED .STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 142. Argued March 14, 15, 1892. Decided April 10, 1892. Cigarette paper, of suitable size and quality to be used in making cigarett
Coosaw Mining Co. v. South Carolina
COOSAW MINING COMPANY v. SOUTH CAROLINA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 1448. Argued March 14, 15, 1892. Decided April 4, 1892. The statute of the State of South Carolina, passed M
Hartford Life Annuity Insurance v. Unsell
HARTFORD LIFE ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNSELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 224. Submitted March 23, 1892. Decided April 4, 1892. In an action to recover on a policy of life i
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.