Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1892 Cases
260 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Freeman v. Asmus
FREEMAN v. ASMUS. APPEAL EROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE PENNSYLVANIA. No. 323. Argued April 20, 21, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. The first claim of reissued letters patent No. 3204, granted to George
Clay Center v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
CLAY CENTER v. FARMERS’ LOAN & TRUST COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 339. Submitted April 26, 1892. Decided May 2, 1892. When, in an action to recover an instalment of rent, the ju
Washington v. Opie
WASHINGTON v. OPIE. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT.OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 282. Argued April 8, 11, 1892. Decided May 2, 1892. Payments of bonds secured-by .a mortgage of real estate in Virginia, made in
Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Pennsylvania
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE PENNSYLVANIA. No. 275. Argued April 5, 1892. Decided May 2, 1892. state tax against a raiiroad corporation, incorporated under its laws, on account o
People ex rel. New York Electric Lines Co. v. Squire
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. NEW YORK ELECTRIC LINES COMPANY v. SQUIRE. ERROR TO THE COURT OE COMMON PLEAS OE THE CITY AND COUNTY OE NEW YORK. No. 185. Argued March 3, 4, 1892. Decided May 2, 1892. The statute of June 13, 1885, o
Topliff v. Topliff
TOPLIFF v. TOPLIFF AND ANOTHER. TOPLIFF AND ANOTHER v. TOPLIFF. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT. OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Nos. 220, 277. Argued April 5, 1892. Decided May 2, 1892. Letters patent No. 108,085, is
Goode v. Gaines
GOODE v. GAINES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN "DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 227. Argued April 18, 1892. Decided May 2, 1892. The court again adheres to its decision in Rector' v. Gibbon, 111 U. S. 276, tou
Barnett v. Denison
BARNETT v. DENISON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 297. Submitted April 13, 1892. Decided May 2, 1892. When the charter of a municipal corporation requires that bonds issued by it shal
Furrer v. Ferris
FURRER v. FERRIS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 296. Argued April 13, 1892. Decided May 2, 1892. The findings of a master in chancery, concurred in by the court, are to be taken as
New England Mortgage Security Co. v. Gay
NEW ENGLAND MORTGAGE SECURITY COMPANY v. GAY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED .STATES. FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 221. Argued March 22, 1892. Decided May 2, 1892. When the jurisdiction of this court depends upon the
Willard v. Willard
WILLARD v. WILLARD. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT ' OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 318. Argued April 18, 1892. Decided May 2, 1892. Under the act of August 15, 1876, c. 297, relating to partition of real estate in the District of Columbia
Brenham v. German American Bank
BRENHAM v. GERMAN AMERICAN BANK. (No. 2.) ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 120. Submitted and Decided May 2, 1892. On a petition, for a rehearing the court vacates the judgment ordered i
St. Joseph & St. Louis Railroad v. Humphreys
ST. JOSEPH AND ST. LOUIS RAILROAD COMPANY v. HUMPHREYS. APPEAL FROM THE. CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 287. Argued and submitted April 12, 1892. Decided April 25, 1892. Following Quincy, Missou
Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. Humphreys
QUINCY, MISSOURI AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. HUMPHREYS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES- FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 223. Argued March 23, 1892. Decided April 25, 1892. A receiver appointed by order of a
Lewis v. Barnhart
LEWIS v. BARNHART. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 1211. Submitted November 3, 1891. Decided April 25, 1892. In 1838 R. L., a resident of Ohio, received a patent from the United Sta
Oregon Railway & Navigation Co. v. Oregonian Railway Co.
OREGON RAILWAY AND NAVIGATION COMPANY v. OREGONIAN RAILWAY COMPANY (Limited). ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ' DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 335. Submitted April 20, 1892. Decided April 25, 1892. For reasons stated in the
Sessions v. Romadka
SESSIONS v. ROMADKA. ROMADKA v. SESSIONS. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP WISCONSIN. Nos. 262, 263. Argued March 30, 31, 1892. Decided April 25, 1892. An. assignee in bankruptcy is not bound t
United States v. Eaton
UNITED STATES v. EATON. CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION IN OPINION FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT •OF THE-UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT’OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 291. Submitted April 12, 1892. Decided April 25, 1892. A regulation made August 25, 1886, by the
Underwood v. Metropolitan National Bank
UNDERWOOD v. METROPOLITAN NATIONAL BANK. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 270. Argued and submitted April 4, 1892. Decided April 25, 1892. M. gave to a bank a mortgage on land owne
Gregory v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
GREGORY v. BOSTON SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 292. Argued April 12, 13, 1892. Decided April 25, 1892. Money, the proceeds of a note, was deposited
Kendall v. San Juan Silver Mining Co.
KENDALL v. SAN JUAN SILVER MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE COLORADO. No. 294. Submitted April 13, 1892. Decided April 25, 1892. Intrusion upon and location of a mining claim within the territory set apart by the t
Roberts v. Lewis
ROBERTS v. LEWIS. ERROR TO THE. CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 285. Argued April 12, 1892. Decided April 25, 1892. Under Rev. Stat. § 914, and according to the Codé of Civil Procedure of the State of Ne
Adams v. Louisiana Board of Liquidation
ADAMS v. LOUISIANA BOARD OF LIQUIDATION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE LOUISIANA. No. 187. Argued and submitted March 4, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. The judgment of a state court in a suit to compel the funding of state bonds
Sage v. Louisiana Board of Liquidation
SAGE v. LOUISIANA BOARD OF LIQUIDATION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT. OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 21. Argued and submitted March 4, 1892. Decided April 18, 1892. A judgment of a state court upon the question whether bonds of the State-were
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.