Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1898 Cases
173 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hayes v. United States
HAYES v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. No. 29. Argued January 28, 1897. — Decided May 23,1898. In the spring of the year 1825, when the grant of public land in controversy in this, suit was madé, the territori
United States v. Salambier
UNITED STATES v. SALAMBIER. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 117. Submitted May 6, 1898. — Decided May 28, 1898. A protest by an importer, addressed to the collector and signed by'the importer-saying
Holloway v. Dunham
HOLLOWAY v. DUNHAM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 247. Argued May 4,1898. Decided May 23, 1898. On an appeal from the judgment of the Supreme Court of a Territory, the findings of fact are conclusive upon this
New York Indians v. United States
NEW YORK INDIANS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. Announced May 23, 1898. The judgment and mandate in this case, 170 U. S. 1, are amended. In this case it is ordered that the judgment and mandate be aménded so as ‘to read
Ledbetter v. United States
LEDBETTER v. UNITED STATES. •ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP IOAVA. No. 196. Submitted April 12, 1898. — Decided May 23, 1898. An indictment for a violation of the provisions of section 16 of th
Provident Life & Trust Co. v. Mercer County
PROVIDENT LIFE & TRUST COMPANY v. MERCER COUNTY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH' CIRCUIT. Argued April 29, May 2, 1898. —Decided May 23, 1898. The transactions with the county of Mercer, which resulted in the deliv
Wagoner v. Evans
WAGONER v. EVANS. EVANS v. WAGONER. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. Nos. 252, 262. Submitted April 29, 1898. — Decided May 28, 1898. Thomas, v. Gay, 169 U. S. 261, affirmed and followed to the point that “ the a
Fink v. United States
FINK v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 120. Argued April 28, 1898. Decided May 23, 1898. Muriate of cocaine is properly dutiable under paragraph 74 of the tariff act of October 1, 18
Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.
WESTINGHOUSE v. BOYDEN POWER BRAKE COMPANY. BOYDEN POWER BRAKE COMPANY v. WESTINGHOUSE. CEETIOEAEI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOE THE FOURTH circuit; Nos. 116, 99. Argued March 10, 11, 1898. Decided May 9, 1898. The Boyden device for a
Texas and Pacific Railway Co. v. Reeder
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. REEDER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 208. Submitted April 15, 1898 Desided May 9, 1898. A provision in a contract, made with a railroad company for the carriage of liv
United States v. Garter
UNITED STATES v. GARTER. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Submitted April 14, 1898. Decided May 9, 1898. It is not part of the official duties of the District' Attorney of the district, in which, at the time, a session of the Court of Appea
United States v. Winston
UNITED STATES v. WINSTON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE' NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 205. Submitted April 14, 1898. — Decided May 9, 1898. The boundaries of his district are the limits of the official duties of a District Attorney, a
Andersen v. United States
ANDERSEN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 583. Argued April 11, 1898. Decided May 9, 1898. The indictment in this case, which is set forth at length in the statement
Vance v. W. A. Vandercook Co.
VANCE v. W. A. VANDERCOOK COMPANY (No. 2). ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 515. Argued March 9, 10, 1898. Decided May 9, 1898. In determining from the face of a pleading whether the am
Vance v. W. A. Vandercook Co.
VANCE v. W. A. VANDERCOOK COMPANY (No. 1). APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 514. Argued March 9, 10, 1898. Decided May 9, 1898. It is settled by previous adjudications of this court:
Rhodes v. Iowa
RHODES v. IOWA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 21. Argued February 23, 1898. Decided May 9, 1898. Section 1553 of the code of Iowa, which provides that “if any express company, railway company or any agent or person in
Havnor v. New York
HAVNOR v. NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 227. Argued April 21, 1898. Decided May 9, 1898. It was essential,' in order to confer jurisdiction on this court, in this case, that the chief judge of the Court
Jolly v. United States
JOLLY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 238. Submitted April 28, 1898. Decided May 9, 1898. Postage stamps belonging to the United States are personal property, within the'"
Stuart v. Easton
STUART v. EASTON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOE THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 197. Argued April 12, 13, 1898 Decided May 9, 1898. The construction and legal effect of a patent for land is matter for the court, and evidence to aid
Smith v. United States
SMITH v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 212. Submitted April 20, 1898. Decided May 9, 1898. When an entryman goes to the public land, office for the purpose of obtaining public-land, and is told b
Virginia & Alabama Coal Co. v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.
VIRGINIA AND ALABAMA COAL COMPANY v. CENTRAL RAILROAD AND BANKING COMPANY OF GEORGIA. CERTIORARI to the circuit court of appeals for the fifth CIRCUIT. No. 100. Argued December 14, 15, 1897. Decided May 9, 1898. Vhere expenditures have been
Plaquemines Tropical Fruit Co. v. Henderson
PLAQUEMINES TROPICAL FRUIT COMPANY v. HENDERSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED' STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 204 Argued April 15, 1898. —Decided. May 2, 1898. The courts of a State may take cognizance of a
Shaw v. Kellogg
SHAW v. KELLOGG. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 154. Submitted February 23, 1898. Decided May 2, 1898. In 1860 Congress granted a quantity of land in New Mexico, in fulfilment of a grant of non-minera
Williams v. Eggleston
WILLIAMS, TREASURER, v. EGGLESTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. No. 210. Argued April 19, 20, 1898. Decided May 2, 1898. The legislation of the State of Connecticut whereby the franchise and property of
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.