Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1898 Cases
173 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Levis v. Kengla
LEVIS v. KENGLA. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 173. Argued January 11, 12, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. Decree affirmed on a question of fact only. The case is stated in the opinion. Mr. Henry E. Davi
Barrett v. United States
BARRETT v. UNITED STATES (No. 2). ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 175. Argued January 21, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. It having been decided in Barrett v. United States,
Barrett v. United States
BARRETT v. UNITED STATES (No. 1). ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE -UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Argued January 21, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. When a.bill of exceptions does not contain the evidence, it is imposs
United States v. Klumpp
UNITED STATES v. KLUMPP. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 159. Argued January 20, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. In paragraph 297 of the tariff act of August 27, 1894, c. 349, 28 Stat. 609, providing that “ t
Baker v. Cummings
BAKER v. CUMMINGS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 189. Argued January 14, 17, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. Stuart v. Hayden, 169 U. S. 1, affirmed to the point that when two courts have reached the sam
Cessna v. United States
CESSNA v. UNITED STATES. A2FEAL FBOM THJB COBBS OF TBIVATB LAND CLAIMS. No. 78. Argued and submitted January 4, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. The decision of the Court of Private Land Claims that the ayuntamiento of El Paso had no power
Benjamin v. New Orleans
BENJAMIN v. NEW ORLEANS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 188. Argued January 10, 1898. Decided January 31, 1898. After the answers of this court to the question» of the Circuit Court of Appeals in this ca
Ritter v. Mutual Life Insurance
RITTER v. MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 142. Argued December 3, 6, 1897. Decided January 17, 1898. This was an action on six policies of insurance, all alike
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Solan
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. SOLAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 78. Argued November 1, 1897. Decided January 17, 1898. A statute of a State, providing that no contract shall exempt any railroad
Richardson v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
RICHARDSON v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. No. 251. Submitted December 13, 1897. Decided January 17, 1898. On a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, this court being o
Wetmore v. Rymer
WETMORE v. RYMER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES .FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT- OF TENNESSEE. No. 76. Submitted November 1, 1897. Decided January 17, 1898. In an action of ejectment the question whether the land in dispute is o
Union Mutual Life Insurance v. Kirchoff
UNION MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. KIRCHOFF. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT. OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 155. Argued December 16, 17, 1897. Decided January 10, 1898. Tbe defendant in error filed a bill against the plaintiff in error in a
Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
POWERS v. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 144. Argued December 6, 7, 1897. Decided January 10, 1898. A judgment of tlie Circuit Court of the United State
Holder v. Aultman
HOLDER v. AULTMAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 109. Argued November 8, 9, 1897. —Decided January 10, 1898. Under a statute of a State, imposing a franchise tax on foreign corpora
Building & Loan Ass'n v. Price
BUILDING AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF DAKOTA v. PRICE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 158. Submitted December 9, 1897. Decided January 10, 1898. The court below having dismissed the bil
Stuart v. Hayden
STUART v. HAYDEN. GRUETTER v. STUART. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 151, 160. Argued December 9, 10, 1897. Decided January 10, 1898. One who holds shares of - national bank stock— the bank being at t
Hetzel v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
HETZEL v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP. APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 110. Argued November 9, 1897. Decided January 8, 1898. • This was an action to recover damages for injury done to certain land in t
United States v. Passavant
UNITED STATES v. PASSAVANT. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 129. Argued December 1, 1897. Decided January 8, 1898. In proceedings brought before the board of general appraisers by protests under § 1
In re Boardman
In re BOARDMAN, Applicant on behalf of Durrant. original. No number. Presented and denied, January 7, 1898. Application for leave to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus will be denied if it be apparent that the only result, if the w
Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Austin
PENN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. AUSTIN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THB WESTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. No. 44. Argued April 23, 1897. Decided January 3, 1898. The complainants in their bill predicated their right to
Castillo v. McConnico
CASTILLO v. McCONNICO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 48. Argued October 19, 20, 1897. Decided January 3, 1898. This action was brought and prosecuted to final judgment in the state courts of Louisiana. Its object
McHenry v. Alford
McHENRY v. ALFORD. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 189. Argued December 2, 3, 1897. Decided January 3, 1898. The ruling in United States v. Union Pacific Sailroad, 168 TJ. S. 605, that each question
Conde v. York
CONDE v. YORK. •ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 143. Argued December 6, 1897. Decided January 3, 1898. Ia order to give this court jurisdiction to review the judgment of a state court against a title or right set up
Crossley v. California
CROSSLEY v. CALIFORNIA. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OE CALIFORNIA. No. 470. Submitted December 14, 1897. Decided January 3, 1898. In a trial before a state court for murder charged to havé be
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.