Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1898 Cases
173 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Thompson v. Utah
THOMPSON v. UTAH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH. No. 553. Argued March 4, 7, 1898. Decided April 25, 1898. The provision in the constitution of the State of Utah, providing for the trial of criminal cases, not capital, in
Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank
MAGOUN v. ILLINOIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 464. Argued January 28. 1898. Decided April 25, 1898. The inheritance tax law of Illinois, of June 15,
Calderon v. Atlas Steamship Co.
CALDERON v. ATLAS STEAMSHIP COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 83. Argued March 8, 9, 1898. Decided April 25, 1898. The appellant shipped, by a vessel belonging to the appellee, goods under a bil
Selvester v. United States
SELVESTER v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 397. Argued March 14, 1898. Decided April 25, 1898. Plaintiff in error was indicted for alleged violations of Rev. Sta
Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. Texas
HOUSTON AND TEXAS CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY v. TEXAS. ' ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE SECOND' SU-' PREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 406. Argued January 24, 25, 1898. Decided April 25, 1898. In Galveston, Harris
Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Texas
GALVESTON, HARRISBURG AND SAN ANTONIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OE CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS'. No. 421. Argued January 21, 24, 1898. Decided April 25, 1898. When it does
Williams v. Mississippi
WILLIAMS v. MISSISSIPPI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP' THE/STATE OP'MISSISSIPPI; No. 531. Argued and submitted March 18, 1898. Decided April 25, 1898. The provisions in section 241 of the constitution of Mississippi prescribing the qualifi
Humes v. United States
HUMES v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 150. Submitted February 21, 1898. Decided April 25, 1898. It is again'decided that it is no- gronnd for reversal that the cou
Kirwan v. Murphy
KIRWAN v. MURPHY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EÍGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 550. Submitted March 28, 1898. Decided April 25, 1898. An interlocutory order of a Circuit Court for the issue of'a temporary injunction, having been tak
Hawker v. New York
HAWKER v. NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE COURT OE GENERAL SESSIONS OE THE PEACE EOR THE CITY AND COUNTY OE NEW YORK, STATE OE NEW YORK. No. 415. Argued March 9, 1898. Decided April 18, 1898. The provision in the act of the legislature of New York o
Kipley v. Illinois
KIPLEY v. ILLINOIS. KIPLEY v. ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE ILLINOIS. Nos. 586, 601. Submitted March 14, 1898. Decided April 18, 1898. When the jurisdiction of this court is invoked for the protection, against the fin
American Surety Co. v. Pauly
AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY v. PAULY (No. 2). ■ ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT'. No. 169. Argued January 7, 1898. Decided April 18, 1898. ■This was an action upon a bond guaranteeing a national bank against loss by
American Surety Co. v. Pauly
AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY v. PAULY (No. 1). ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 168. Argued January 6, 7, 1898. Decided April 18, 1898. In an action against the maker of a bond, given to indemnify or insure a. ba
Stevens
THE JOHN G. STEVENS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE- CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 25. Argued January 27, 1897. Decided April 18, 1898. A collision between two vessels by the fault of one of them creates a maritime lien upon he
Louisville Water Co. v. Kentucky
LOUISVILLE WATER COMPANY v. KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 179. Argued January 11, 1898. Decided April 11, 1898. On the authority of Louisville Water Company v. Ciarle, 143 U. S. 1, which is affirmed,
Barrow Steamship Co. v. Kane
BARROW STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. KANE. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 858. Argued October 22, 1897. Decided April 11, 1898. The Circuit Court of the United States, held within one State, has jurisdictio
Missouri ex rel. Laclede Gas Light Co. v. Murphy
MISSOURI, ex rel. LACLEDE GAS LIGHT COMPANY v. MURPHY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 47. Argued March 1,.2,1898. Decided April 11, 1898. The Supreme Court of Missouri having held that the act of the legislature of
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska ex rel. Omaha
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY v. NEBRASKA, ex rel. OMAHA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE NEBRASKA. No. 178. Argued January 10, 11, 1898. Decided April 11, 1898. A Federal question was specifically presented in
Parsons v. District of Columbia
PARSONS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS OE THE DISTRICT OE COLUMBIA.. No. 177. Submitted December 20, 1897. Decided April 11, 1898. Although the matter in dispute in this ease is not sufficient to give this court juri
Budzisz v. Illinois Steel Co.
BUDZISZ v. ILLINOIS STEEL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE WISCONSIN. No. 560. Submitted February 21,1898. Decided April 11, 1898. JSTo question is presented which brings this case within
Leyson v. Davis
LEYSON v. DAVIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. No. 517. Submitted March 14, 1898. Decided April 11, 1898. In a suit commenced in a court of the State of Montana by the administrator of the donor of national bank stock,
New York Indians v. United States
NEW YORK INDIANS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 106, Argued March 2, 3, 1898. Decided April 11, 1898. The provision in the treaty of O'une'lS, 1838, with the New York Indians,, that.the United State? will set apart a
United States v. Wong Kim Ark
UNITED STATES v. WONG KIM ARK. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 182. Argued March 5, 8, 1897. Decided March 28, 1898. A child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese d
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Behlmer
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. BEHLMER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 585. Submitted March 14, 1898. Decided March 28, 1898. The provision in § 16 of the act of February 4, 1887, as amend
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.