Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1898 Cases
173 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Aultman
McCORMICK HARVESTING MACHINE CO. v. AULTMAN. SAME v. AULTMAN-MILLER COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 130, 131. Argued December 1, 2, 1897. Decided March 21, 1898. If the owner of a patent ap
United States ex rel. Bernardin v. Butterworth
UNITED STATES, ex rel. BERNARDIN v. BUTTERWORTH. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 404. Submitted February 21, 1898. Decided March 21, 1898. A suit to compel the Commissioner of Patents to issue a patent abates
Wilson v. North Carolina
WILSON v. NORTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 558. Submitted January 17, 1898. Decided March 21, 1898. Chapter 320 of the’Laws of North Carolina of 1891 was.a valid law, and the action of the Gover
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Haber
MISSOURI, KANSAS AND TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. HABER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE KANSAS. No. 268. Argued January 27, 1898. Decided March 14, 1898. The act of Kansas of 1891, c. 201, as amended and as it-appears in 2 Gen. Stat
Merritt v. Bowdoin College
MERRITT v. BOWDOIN COLLEGE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 505. Submitted January 31, 1898. Decided March 14, 1898. An appeal does not Tie to this court from the decision of a
Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.
BACKUS v. FORT STREET UNION DEPOT COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 55. Argued January 17, 18, 1898. Decided March 7, 1898. As the respondents; both at the trial in the Circuit Court of the State, and in the
Smyth v. Ames
SMYTH v. AMES. SMYTH v. SMITH. SMYTH v. HIGGINSON. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Nos. 49, 50, 51. Argued April 5, 6, 7, 1897. Decided March 7, 1898. The adequacy or inadequacy of a remedy
Central National Bank v. Stevens
CENTRAL NATIONAL BANK v. STEVENS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 88. Argued October 15, 1897. Decided March 7, 1898. In August, 1880, Sackett brought suit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, on behalf
Savings & Loan Society v. Multnomah County
SAVINGS AND LOAN SOCIETY v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY. APPEAL- PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 69. Argued October 29, 1897. Decided March 7, 1898. The statute of Oregon of October 26, 1882, taxing mortgage
Holden v. Hardy
HOLDEN v. HARDY (No. 1). HOLDEN v. HARDY (No. 2). ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH. Nos. 261, 264. Argued October 21, 1897. Decided February 28, 1898. The provisions in the act of March 30, 1896, c. 72, of Utah, providing tha
Beley v. Naphtaly
BELEY v. NAPHTALY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 180. Submitted January 5, 1898. Decided February 28, 1898. The patent to the defendant in error does not preclude this court from inquiring into the effect
United States v. Eaton
UNITED STATES v. EATON. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 174. Submitted January 4, 1898. Decided February 28, 1898. Congress has power, under the Constitution, to vest in the President authority to appoint a subordinate officer, called
Payne v. Robertson
PAYNE v. ROBERTSON. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 20. Submitted January 17, 1893. Decided February 28, 1898. A deputy marshal of the United States, duly appointed as such prior to the passage of the act of
Smithsonian Institution v. Meech
SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION v. MEECH. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 191. Argued January 12, 1898, Decided February 23, 1898. In the District of Columbia it is the rule that when, upon a purchase of real estat
Brown v. Marion National Bank
BROWN v. MARION NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 201. Submitted January 21, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. Section 5198 of the Revised Statutes of the United States prescribing what rate of intere
United States v. Garlinger
UNITED STATES v. GARLINGER. APPEAL FEOM THE COUBT OF CLAIMS. No. 166. Argued January 4, 5, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. Article 420 of the Treasury Regulations, providing that night watchmen shall be divided into two watches as nearly a
Richmond & Alleghany Railroad v. R. A. Patterson Tobacco Co.
RICHMOND AND ALLEGHANY RAILROAD COMPANY v. R. A. PATTERSON TOBACCO COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP VIRGINIA. No. 172. Submitted January 4, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. Section 1295 of the Virginia Code of
Willis v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.
WILLIS v. EASTERN TRUST AND BANKING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 383. Submitted October 18, 1897. Decided February 21, 1898. Á summary process to recover possession of land, under the landlord
Baker v. Grice
BAKER v. GRICE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 836. Argued January 26, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. While Circuit Courts of the United States have jurisdiction, under the circu
Thomas v. Gay
THOMAS v. GAY. GAY v. THOMAS. APPEALS PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. Nos. 287, 489. Argued and submitted October 21, 22, 1897. Decided February 21, 1898. The‘act of the legislature of the Territory of Oklahoma of March
Logan County v. United States
LOGAN COUNTY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAR FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 167. Argued January 5, 6, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. Where a railroad company pays a tax on its undistributed surplus under the ' internal revenue act of June 30, 186
United States v. Louisville
UNITED STATES v. LOUISVILLE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 105. Argued January 5, 6, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. The act of March 3, 1891, c. 540, providing for the payment to the city of Louisville of the amount found due under
Dull v. Blackman
DULL v. BLACKMAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE’ OF IOWA. No. 192. Argued January 18, 19, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. On June 25, 1889, plaintiff in error, Daniel Dull, being the owner of tlie tract of land in controversy, co
Wetzel v. Minnesota Railway Transfer Co.
WETZEL v. MINNESOTA RAILWAY TRANSFER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 94. Argued January 25, 1898. Decided February 21, 1898. The decree of the Circuit Court, affirmed by the Circuit Court of App
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.