Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1900 Cases
232 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ex parte Union Steamboat Co.
Ex parte THE UNION STEAMBOAT COMPANY. ORIGINAL. No. 12. Original. Submitted May 14, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. Where this court in a collision case directed a decree dividing the damages as between the two vessels, and allowing to the owne
Fitzpatrick v. United States
FITZPATRICK v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. Submitted April 30, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. Under the Court of Appeals Act of March 3, 1891, a conviction for murder is a “convic
Sully v. American National Bank
SULLY v. AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 266. Argued April 26, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. Bills were filed in Tennessee by the American National Bank and others against the Carnegie Land Co
Corralitos Co. v. United States
CORRALITOS COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE -COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 267. Submitted April 24, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. The appellant herein filed its original petition in the Court of Claims against the United States and the Apache
Taylor v. Beckham
TAYLOR AND MARSHALL v. BECKHAM (No. 2). ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 604. Argued April 30, May 1, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. It results from the conclusions announced in No. 603, ante, 548, that the writ of e
Taylor v. Beckham
TAYLOR AND MARSHALL v. BECKHAM (NO. 1). ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATF OF KENTUCKY. No. 603. Argued April 30, May 1, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. By the constitution and laws of Kentucky, the determination of contests of the elec
May v. New Orleans
MAY v. NEW ORLEANS. No. 332. Argued March 6, 7, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. May & Co., merchants at New Orleans, were engaged in the business of importing goods from abroad, and selling them. In each box, or case in which they were brought
Motes v. United States
MOTES v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EOR THE Northern district of at, a rama. No. 257. Submitted April 23, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. By theTtevised Statutes of the United States it is provided: Ҥ 5508.
Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. Rochester
MOFFETT, HODGKINS AND CLARKE COMPANY v. ROCHESTER. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 217. Argued April 10, 11, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. The city of Rochester invited proposals from contractors for two separat
Pittsburgh & Lake Angeline Iron Co. v. Cleveland Iron Mining Co.
PITTSBURGH AND LAKE ANGELINE IRON COMPANY v. CLEVELAND IRON MINING CO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 260. Argued April 24, 25, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the court, the
North American Transportation & Trading Co. v. Morrison
NORTH AMERICAN TRANSPORTATION & TRADING COMPANY v. MORRISON. ERROR'.TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 203. Submitted March 20, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. Where a plaintiff asserts, as liis cause
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Martin
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MARTIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 135. Submitted January 31, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. This was an ordinary action, under a state statute, for wrongfully cau
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ann Arbor Railroad
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. ANN ARBOR RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE- CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 202. Argued and submitted March 19, 20, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. When a suit does not really and substant
McDonnell v. Jordan
McDONNELL v. JORDAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED _ STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 253. Argued April 19, 20, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. The' decision in Fisk v. Henarie, 142 U. S. 459, that the words in the ac
Tarpey v. Madsen
TARPEY v. MADSEN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH. No. 119. Argued January 25, 26, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. The right of one who has actually occupied public land, with an intent to make a homestead or preemption entry, c
Moran v. Horsky
MORAN v. HORSKY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. No. 177. Argued and submitted March 12, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. A neglected riglit, if neglected too long, must be treated as an abandoned right, -which no court will
Browning v. De Ford
BROWNING v. DE FORD. ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 245. Argued April 16, 17, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. General creditors attaching the goods of an insolvent debtor upon the ground that they h
Clarke v. Clarke
CLARKE v. CLARKE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. No. 216. Argued April 9, 10, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. It is a doctrine firmly established that the law of a State in which land is situated controls and
Castner v. Coffman
CASTNER v. COFFMAN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 113. Argued January 23, 24, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. On the facts as detailed, in the opinion of the court, it is held that there was no error in
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Howard
CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. HOWARD. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 247. Argued April 17, 18, 1900. Decided May 21, 1900. The wife of the defendant in error, while travelling from Louisville to Wash
Earle v. Conway
EARLE v. CONWAY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE PENNSYLVANIA No. 219. Argued April 11, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. A receiver of a National Bank may be notified, by service upon him of an attachment issued from a state court, of the nature a
Earle v. Pennsylvania
EARLE v. PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 218. Argued April 11, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. An attachment sued out against a bank as garnishee is not an attachment against the bank or its property,
Smith v. Reeves
SMITH v. REEVES. error to the circuit court oe appeals eor the ninth circuit. No. 242. Argued April 16, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. Within the meaning of the constitutional provisions relating to actions instituted by private persons agains
Rider v. United States
RIDER v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 40. Argued November 1, 1899. Decided May 14, 1900. The fourth and fifth sections of the River and Harbor Act, approved September
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.