Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1900 Cases
232 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Sherman v. United States
SHERMAN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 459. Argued December 5, 6, 7, 1899. Decided May 14, 1900. Knowlton v. Moore, ante, 41, and Murdock v. Ward, ante, 139, foll
Murdock v. Ward
MURDOCK v. WARD. ERROR to the circuit court of the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 458. Argued December 5, 6, 7, 1899. Decided May 14, 1900. Knowlton v. Moore, ante, 41, followed in this case as to the points there
Plummer v. Coler
PLUMMER v. COLER. ERROR TO THE surrogate’s COURT OE THE COUNTY OE NEW YORK, STATE OE NEW YORK. No. 489. Argued February 27, 28, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. Tlie right to take property by will or descent is derived from and regulated by muni
Fidelity Insurance Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. McClain
FIDELITY INSURANCE TRUST AND SAFE DEPOSIT COMPANY v. McCLAIN. ERROR to the circuit court of the united states for the EASTERN DISTRICT OF FENNSTLVANIA. No. 451. Argued and submitted December 5, 6, 7, 1899. Decided May 14, 1900. Xlie judgmen
High v. Coyne
HIGH v. COYNE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 225 Argued December 5, 6, 7, 1899.) Decided Decided May 14, 1900. The assignments of error in this case raised only the constitutio
Knowlton v. Moore
KNOWLTON v. MOORE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 387. Argued December 5, 6, 7, 1899. Decided May 14, 1900. The plaintiffs in error were the executors of the will of Edwin F. Knowit
Osborne v. San Diego Land & Town Co.
OSBORNE v. SAN DIEGO LAND AND TOWN COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 201. Argued March 19, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. The appropriation and disposition of water in Cali
Roehm v. Horst
ROEHM v. HORST. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 188. Argued March 15, 16, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. After a careful review of all the cases, American and English, relating to anticipatory breaches of an execu
The Carlos F. Roses
THE CARLOS F. ROSES. APPEAL EROM THE DISTRICT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP FLORIDA. No. 243. Argued January 12, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. The Carlos F..Roses, a Spanish vessel, owned at Barcelona, Spain, sailed
Bryar v. Campbell
BRYAR v. CAMPBELL. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 227. Argued April 12, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. Plaintiff’s intestate, a married woman, filed a bill in the District Court of the United States against lier hu
Knapp, Stout & Co. v. McCaffrey
KNAPP, STOUT & CO. COMPANY v. McCAFFREY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 263. Submitted April 24, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. A bill in equity in a state court to foreclose a common law lien upon a raft for towage s
Leovy v. United States
LEOVY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 238. Argued April 12, 16, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. Subject to tbe paramount jurisdiction of Congress over the navigable waters of the United St
Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. Thiebaud
CINCINNATI, HAMILTON AND DAYTON RAILROAD COMPANY v. THIEBAUD. SAME v. SAME. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 259. Argued April 24, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED
Howard v. De Cordova
HOWARD v. DE CORDOVA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 246. Argued and submitted April 17, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. Following Cooper v. Newell, 173 U. S. 555, it is held that the
Chamberlin v. Browning
CHAMBERLIN v. BROWNING. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF'APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 251. Argued April 19, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. The substantial relief sought in this case against the attaching creditors and the matter in dispute
Williams v. Wingo
WILLIAMS v. WINGO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 222. Argued April 11, 12, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. The act of the legislature of Virginia of March 5, 1840, providing that “ it shall not be lawful fo
L'Hote v. New Orleans
L’HOTE v. NEW ORLEANS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 204. Argued March. 20, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. The ordinance of the city of New Orleans set forth at length below in the statement of the case, prescribing
Erb v. Morasch
ERB v. MORASCH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 249. Submitted April 18, 1900. Decided May 14, 1900. All questions arising under the constitution and laws of Kansas are, for the purposes of this case, foreclosed by th
Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.
LOS ANGELES v. LOS ANGELES CITY WATER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 148. Submitted March 15,1900. Decided April 30, 1900. July 22, 1868, Los Angeles City leased, to
Daggs v. Phœnix National Bank
DAGGS v. PHŒNIX NATIONAL BANK. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 138. Submitted January 30, 1900. Decided April 30, 1900. In the provision in Rev. Stat. § 5197 that when no rate of interest “is fixed by the laws
Apache County v. Barth
APACHE COUNTY v. BARTH. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 181. Submitted March 13, 1900. Decided April 30, 1900. In an action at common law to recover from a municipal organization upon a warranty issued by it,
Bad Elk v. United States
JOHN BAD ELK v. UNITED STATES. EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 350. Submitted February 26, 1900. Decided April 30, 1900. Three policemen in South Dakota attempted, under verbal orders, t
De Lamar's Nevada Gold Mining Co. v. Nesbitt
DE LAMAR’S NEVADA GOLD MINING COMPANY v. NESBITT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA. No. 152. Argued March 1, 1900. Decided April 30, 1900. Tbe fact that in a state court plaintiff and defendant make adverse claims to a mini
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Illinois
CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE ILLINOIS. No. 198. Argued and submitted March 16, 1900. Decided April 30, 1900. A state statute' required all regular passe
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.