Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1900 Cases
232 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Shoshone Mining Co. v. Rutter
SHOSHONE MINING COMPANY v. RUTTER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 208. Argued March 21, 1900. Decided April 30, 1900. A suit brought in support of an adverse claim under Rev. Stat. §§ 2325, 2326, is not
Tennessee v. Virginia
TENNESSEE v. VIRGINIA. ORIGINAL. No. 11, original. Submitted April 17, 1900. Decided April 30, 1900. A decree is entered, ordering the appointment of commissioners to ascertain, re-trace, re-mark and reestablish the boundary line between th
Carter v. Roberts
CARTER v. ROBERTS. APPEAL FROM AND- ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 570. Submitted April 9, 1900. Decided April 23, 1900. Captain Carter, of the corps of engineers, in the army of t
Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.
MAST, FOOS & CO. v. STOVER MANUFACTURING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 149. Argued February 1, 2, 1900. Decided April 23, 1900. There is no obligation on the part of courts in patent causes
Adams v. Cowen
ADAMS v. COWEN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 113 of October Term, 1898. Argued January 10, 11, 1900. Decided April 16, 1900. Thomas W. Means died in 1890, leaving a large estate, and a will made some
Carter v. Texas
CARTER v. TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 193. Submitted March 16, 1900. Decided April 16, 1900. Whenever by any action of a State, whether through its legislature, through its courts, or through its
United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad
UNITED STATES v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 408. Argued January 26, 29, 1900. Decided April 16, 1900. The important questions of fact and law are substantially the
Doherty v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
DOHERTY v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 121. Argued January 26, 29, 1900. Decided April 16, 1900. The eastern terminus of the Northern Pacific Railroad, which was constructed un
Crawford v. Hubbell
CRAWFORD v. HUBBELL. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 248. Argued November 8, 9, 1899. Decided April 16, 1900. Tlie matter embraced in the questions submitted to this court has been considered, and w
American Express Co. v. Michigan
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY v. MICHIGAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 220. Argued November 9, 1899. Decided April 16, 1900. A. proceeding for a mandamus is “ a suit ” within the meaning of that term as employed in R
Werlein v. New Orleans
WERLEIN v. NEW ORLEANS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE LOUISIANA. No. 189. Argued March 16, 1900. Decided April 16, 1900. The city of New Orleans commenced an action in March, 1895, in the Civil District Court for tlie Parish of
Ex parte Baez
Ex parte BAEZ. ORIGINAL. No. Submitted March 26, 1900. Decided April 12, 1900. It is well settled tliat this court will not proceed to adjudication where there is no subject-matter upon which the judgment of the court can operate: and altho
Boske v. Comingore
BOSKE v. COMINGORE. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. Submitted January 8, 1900. Decided April 9, 1900. A United States Collector of Internal Revenue was adjudged by a court of limited-jurisdi
Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Co. v. Jones
GREAT SOUTHERN FIRE PROOF HOTEL COMPANY v. JONES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 210. Argued March 21, 22, 1900. Decided April 9, 1900. On writ of error or appeal, tlie first and fundamental question i
Wesley v. Eells
WESLEY v. EELLS. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP OHIO. No. 176. Argued and submitted March 9, 1900. Decided April 9, 1900. Specific performance Of an executory contract is not of absolute righ
Caffrey v. Oklahoma Territory
CAFFREY v. OKLAHOMA TERRITORY. error to and appeal from the supreme court of the territory OF OKLAHOMA. No. 182. Argued March 13, 14, 1900. Decided April 9, 1900. . The plaintiff in error was county, clerk of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma Terri
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Gardner
MINNEAPOLIS AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. GARDNER. EREÓR TO THE SUPREME 'COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 160. Submitted March 5, 1900. Decided April 9, 1900. There is no substantial difference between the Federal question in this ca
Saranac Land & Timber Co. v. Comptroller of New York
SARANAC LAND AND TIMBER COMPANY v. COMPTROLLER OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 94. Argued December 21, 22, 1899. Decided April 9, 1900. Turner v. New York, 168 U. S. 90
Credits Commutation Co. v. United States
CREDITS COMMUTATION COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. SAME v. DEXTER. SAME v. AMES. Nos. 233, 234, 235. Submitted February 26, 1900. Decided April 9, 1900. When leave to intervene in an equity case is asked and refused, the order denying leave is n
United States v. Harris
UNITED STATES v. HARRIS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 169. Argued March 5, 6, 1960. Decided April 9, 1900. A receiver of arailroad is not within the letter or the spirit of the provisions of the act
Consolidated Canal Co. v. Mesa Canal Co.
CONSOLIDATED CANAL COMPANY v. MESA CANAL COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 200. Submitted March 15, 1900. Decided April 9, 1900. This court, in view of the finding of the court below as to the influence
Keim v. United States
KEIM v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 57. Submitted March 5, 1900. Decided April 9, 1900. Keim was honorably discharged from the military service by reason of disability resulting from injuries received in it. He passe
Hyde v. Bishop Iron Co.
HYDE v. BISHOP IRON COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 126. Argued January 29, 30, 1900. Decided April 9, 1900. On the. evidence set forth in the statement of facts and in the opinion of the court, it is held
Arnold v. Hatch
ARNOLD v. HATCH. ERROR to the circuit court of appeals for the seventh CIRCUIT. No. 183. Argued March 14, 1900. Decided April 9, 1900. A farmer made' an arrangement with, his son under which it was agreed that the latter should undertake th
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.