Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1901 Cases
177 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Dayton Coal & Iron Co. v. Barton
DAYTON COAL AND IRON COMPANY v. BARTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 26. Argued and submitted March. 7, 1901. Decided October 21, 1901. Knoxville Iron Company v. Harbison, ante 13, followed. This was an action t
Knoxville Iron Co. v. Harbison
KNOXVILLE IRON COMPANY v. HARBISON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 22. Argued and submitted March 7, 1901. Decided October 21, 1901. Tlie act of the legislature of the State of Tennessee, passed March 17, 1899, St
Holzapfel's Compositions Co. v. Rahtjen's American Composition Co.
HOLZAPFEL’S COMPOSITIONS COMPANY v. RAHTJEN’S AMERICAN COMPOSITION COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 64. Argued April 25, 26, 1901. Decided October 21, 1901. This was a controversy relating to a trade-m
County of Hughes v. Livingston
No. 694. County of Hughes v. Livingston. Eighth Circuit. Mr. Thompson P. Estes for the petitioner.'. Mr. Edward O. Stringer opposing.
Glavey v. United States
GLAVEY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 235. Argued April 11, 12, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. When an office with a fixed salary has been created by statute, and a person duly appointed to it has qualified and entered
Jacobs v. Marks
JACOBS v. MARKS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE ILLINOIS. No. 410. Submitted January 7, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. The question whether the record and judicial proceedings in the Michigan court received full faith and credit, i
District of Columbia v. Moulton
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. MOULTON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 224. Argued April 9, 10, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. Park street is a public highway in the northwest section, of the city of Washington. For so
Fuller v. United States
FULLER v. UNITED STATES. Original Application for mandamus. No. 7. Argued and submitted April 15, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. The court below, of original jurisdiction in this case, had authority, upon newly discovered evidence, to grant to
Commercial Bank v. Chambers
COMMERCIAL BANK v. CHAMBERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH. No. 270. Argued and submitted April 26, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. As the constitution of Utah distinguished between stock and credits in determining the amount
Hood v. Wallace
HOOD v. WALLACE. error to the circuit court oe appeals for the eighth circuit. No. 179. Argued March 11, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. Lantry v. Wallace, ante 536, followed. The case is stated in the opinion. The counsel were the same as in L
Lantry v. Wallace
LANTRY v. WALLACE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 180. Argued March 11, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. This action was brought by the receiver of a.national bank under Rev. Stat. § 5151, providing that share
Russell v. United States
RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 242. Argued April 16, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. This was an action at law against the United States upon an alleged implied contract' to pay for the use of a patented inventio
District of Columbia v. Talty
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. TALTY. appeal from the court of claims. No. 238. Argued April 12, 15, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. In this case this court holds, (1) that it was not error in the court below to try the case on the amended petition; (
Calhoun Gold Mining Co. v. Ajaz Gold Mining Co.
CALHOUN GOLD MINING COMPANY v. AJAZ GOLD MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP COLORADO. No. 195. Argued March 13, 14, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. The rights conferred upon the locators of miuing locations by Rev. Stat.
Clews v. Jamieson
CLEWS v. JAMIESON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 245. Argued April 17, 18, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. As the governing committee of the stock exchange had no personal interest in the fund in questi
United States ex rel. Queen v. Alvey
UNITED STATES ex rel. QUEEN v. ALVEY. ORIGINAL,-PETITION FOR MANDAMUS. No. 17. Original. Argued February 25, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. Under the circumstances set forth in its opinion this court thinks that the rule respecting appeals to
Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.
PIRIE v. CHICAGO TITLE AND TRUST COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 391. Argued January 18, 21, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. Frank Brothers were adjudged bankrupts in February, 1899. For a long tim
Simon v. Craft
SIMON v. CRAFT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ALABAMA. No. 191. Argued March 12, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. The essential elements of due process of law are notice and opportunity to defend, and in determining whether such rig
Reagan v. United States
REAGAN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 239. Argued April 15, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. In 1896, commissioners appointed by judges of the United States Court in the Indian Territory were inferior officers, not holdin
Lake Street Elevated Railroad v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
LAKE STREET ELEVATED RAILROAD COMPANY v. FARMERS' LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY. EREOB TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 669. Submitted May 13, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901 The action of the Supreme Court of Illinois in this case on
Homer Ramsdell Transportation Co. v. La Compagnie Générale Transatlantique
HOMER RAMSDELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. LA COMPAGNIE GÉNÉRALE TRANSATLANTIQUE. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 166. Argued March 6, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. The statutes of New York impose compu
Carson v. Brockton Sewerage Commission
CARSON v. BROCKTON SEWERAGE COMMISSION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OP MASSACHUSETTS. No. 249. Argued April 18, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. Whether the construction of a public sewer by assessments upon adjoining property entitles t
Huus v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.
HUUS v. NEW YORK AND PORTO RICO STEAMSHIP COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 514. Argued January 11, 14, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. Vessels engaged in trade between Porto Rican ports and port
Downes v. Bidwell
DOWNES v. BIDWELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 507. Argued January 8, 9, 10, 11, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. By Mr. Justice Brown, in announcing the conclusion and judgment of t
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.