Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1901 Cases
177 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Armstrong v. United States
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 509. Argued January 8, 9, 10 and 11, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. Dooley v. United States, ante, 222, followed. This was a petition to the Court of Claims by a British subject,
Dooley v. United States
DOOLEY v. UNITED STATES. EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 501. Argued January 8, 9, 10, 11, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. The Court of Claims, and the Circuit Courts, acting as such, h
Goetze v. United States
GOETZE v. UNITED STATES. CROSSMAN v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 340 No. 515 was argued December 17, 18, 19, 20, 1900; was argued January 14, 15, 1901. The tw
De Lima v. Bidwell
DE LIMA v. BIDWELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 456. Argued January 8, 9, 10, 11, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. By the Customs Administrative Act of 1890 an appeal is given from t
Leicester Mills Co. v. Powell
No. 665. Leicester Mills Company v. Powell. Third Cir- • cuit.. Mr. Hector T. Fénton for petitioner. Mr*. Charles Howson. opposing.
United States v. McBratney
No. 670. United States v. McBratney. Second Circuit. Mr. Attorney General, Mr. Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hoyt for petitioner.. Mr. Charles Cuide, and Mr. W. Wickham Smith opposing.
Grand Island & Wyoming Central Railroad v. Sweeney
No. 469. Grand Island and Wyoming Central Railroad Company v. Sweeney. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted May 13, 1901. Decided May 20, 1901. Mr. Chornies F.
American Sugar Refining Co. v. United States
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIROÜIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND circuit. Nos. 225, 236. Argued April 12, 1901. Decided May 20, 1901. These cases,
Colburn v. Grant
COLBURN v. GRANT. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 221. Argued and submitted April 8, 9, 1901. Decided May 20, 1901. The statements below of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia in this case, tha
Mallett v. North Carolina
MALLETT v. NORTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 189. Argued April 8, 1901. Decided May 20, 1901. Questions arising under the Constitutipn and'laws of the United States were presented at the trial of this case in
Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co. v. United States
JOSEPH SCHLITZ BREWING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 232. Argued April 11, 1901. Decided May 20, 1901. Bottles and corks in which beer is bottled and exported for sale are not ‘-‘-imported materials used in
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Adams
YAZOO AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. ADAMS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 35. Leave to file petition for rehearing granted February 25, 1901. Decided May 20, 1901. The railroad company filed a bill
Audubon v. Shufeldt
AUDUBON v. SHUFELDT. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 217. Argued April 8, 1901. Decided May 20, 1901. Alimony, whether in arrear at the time of an adjudication in bankruptcy, or accruing afterwards, is not pro
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Burgess
No. 649. Western Union Telegraph Company v. Burgess. Sixth Circuit. Mr. Rush Taggart, Mr. George, II. Fearons and Mr. Henry Newbegin for petitioner.
Luhrs v. Hancock
LUHRS v. HANCOCK. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 176. Argued and submitted March 7, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. By the provision in Act 68 of the Laws of the Territory of Arizona that the common law of Englan
Marks v. Shoup
MARKS v. SHOUP. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. No. 82. Submitted February 28, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. Under the law of Oregon which was in force in Alaska when the seizure and levy of the pl
Armijo v. Armijo
ARMIJO v. ARMIJO. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 243. Argued April 16, 17, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. The act of April 7,1874, c. 80, entitled “An act concerning the practice in territorial courts, and ap
Red River Valley Bank v. Craig
RED RIVER VALLEY BANK v. CRAIG. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE NORTH DAKOTA. No. 231. Argued and submitted April 11, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. There is no such difference in the several statutes of North Dakota, so far as rega
Wells v. Savannah
WELLS v. SAVANNAH. ERROR TO THE SÜPREME COÜRT OE THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 222. Argued April 9, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. Payment of taxes on account of property otherwise liable to taxation can only be avoided by clear proof of a valid c
Lockhart v. Johnson
LOCKHART v. JOHNSON. ERROR TO THE SUPRBMF. COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HEW MEXICO: No. 147. Argued March 22, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. Public lands belonging to the United States, for whose sale or other disposition Congress has made provis
United States v. Edmondston
UNITED STATES v. EDMONDSTON. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 353. Submitted April 8, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. One who pays to government officers, entitled to receive money for public lands, more than the law required him to pay for
Banker v. Harvey
BANKER v. HARVEY. QUEVAS v. HARVEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Nos. 209, 210. Argued March 20, 21, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. The facts in these two cases are so nearly alike that the court thinks it sufficient
Hale v. Lewis
HALE v. LEWIS. EBKOK TO THE SUPREME COUBT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 151. Argued January 28, 29, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. A statute of Wisconsin required building and loan associations to deposit with the state treasurer securities t
The Barnstable
THE BARNSTABLE. OEETIOBAEI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 178. Argued March 8, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. In a suit for a collision against a vessel navigated by charterers, it is competent for the court to ente
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.