Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1903 Cases
273 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hyatt v. People ex rel. Corkran
HYATT v. PEOPLE &c. ex rel. CORKRAN. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 492. Argued January 7, 1903. Decided February 23, 1903. A person, for whose delivery a demand has been made by executive authority of one State
Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. Koehne
INDIANA MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. KOEHNE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 177. Argued October 24, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. Certain taxes having been assessed against complainant, an
Chicago Theological Seminary v. Illinois
CHICAGO THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY v. ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. Nos. 140, 265. Argued and submitted January 20, 21, 1302. Decided February 23, 1903. Section 5 of the act of 1855 of the General Assembly of Illi
Winslow v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
WINSLOW v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FEOM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 125. Argued December 17, 18, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. A lease containing a covenant to renew at its expiration with co
Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.
Boston and Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company v. Montana Ore Purchasing Company. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Montana. No. 102. Argued December 3, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. Th
Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.
BOSTON AND MONTANA CONSOLIDATED COPPER AND SILVER MINING COMPANY v. MONTANA ORE PURCHASING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA. No. 103. Argued December 3,1902. Decided February 23, 1903.
American Ice Co. v. Eastern Trust & Banking Co.
AMERICAN ICE COMPANY v. EASTERN TRUST AND BANKING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 95. Argued December 2, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. Although, as held .in Farmers' Loan & Trust Company v. Penn
Jaquith v. Rowley
JAQUITH v. ROWLEY. APPEAL FEOM THE DISTRICT COURT Op THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP MASSACHUSETTS. No. 81. Argued and submitted November 10,1902. Decided February 23, 1903. One who received money to indemnify him for giving bail bond
Helwig v. United States
HELWIG v. UNITED STATES. CEETIFICATE FEOM THE CIRCUIT COUET OF APPEALS FOE THE SECOND CIBCUIT. No 65. Argued November 4, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. That part of section 7 of the customs administrative act of 1890 which provides that w
Waggoner v. Flack
WAGGONER v. FLACK. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE SECOND SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 28. Argued December 8, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. While this court is not bound by the construction placed by t
United States v. Barringer
UNITED STATES v. BARRINGER. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 252. Argued January 6, 1903. Decided February 23, 1903. The provisions in the sundry civil appropriation act of June 11, 1896, and in the prior acts of Congress referred to in
Commercial Publishing Co. v. Beckwith
COMMERCIAL PUBLISHING COMPANY v. BECKWITH. ERROR TO THE supreme COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 132. Argued December 19,1902. Decided February 23, 1903. 1. Where a right to recover as the result of a judicial sale made under decrees, bo
Rankin v. Chase National Bank
RANKIN v. CHASE NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE OIECUIT COURT OE APPEALS POE THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 105. Argued December 3,4,1002. Decided February 23, 1903. The cashier of a bank in Elmira owing individually to the New York correspondent bank
Gutierres v. Albuquerque Land & Irrigation Co.
GUTIERRES v. ALBUQUERQUE LAND AND IRRIGATION COMPANY. •APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 16. Argued January 9,1902 Decided February 23, 1903. 1. The provisions of the corporation laws of the Territory of New
Prout v. Starr
PROUT v. STARR. APPEAL' FROM THE CIECUIT COUET OF THE TOUTED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 150. Argued January 26, 27,1903. Decided February 23, 1903. It is competent and proper for all the parties to an action to agree to dispen
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Soderberg
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SODERBERG. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 61. Argued December 12, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. 1. Although the jurisdiction of the United States Circuit Court be o
Tarrance v. Florida
TARRANCE v. FLORIDA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME OOURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. No. 202. Argued April 17,1902. Decided February 23, 1903. An actual discrimination by the officers charged with the administration of statutes unobjectionable in thems
Schaefer v. Werling
SCHAEFER v. WERLING. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 151. Argued January 27, 28, 1903. Decided February 23, 1903. The construction placed by the highest courts of the State upon a statute providing for paving streets
Leach v. Burr
LEACH v. BURR. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 145. Argued January 27, 1003. Decided February 23, 1903. Where an order is made on Friday by the Supreme Court of the District of • Columbia in pursuance of th
Reetz v. Michigan
REETZ v. MICHIGAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 143. Argued January 21,1903. Decided February 23, 1903. A State' has power to make reasonable provisions for determining the qualifications of those engaged in the
Williams v. Parker
WILLIAMS v. PARKER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDIOIAL COURT OF THE STATE OF Massachusetts. No. 116. Argued December 5,1902. Decided February 23, 1903. So far as the Federal Constitution is concerned a State may authorize the taking of possessio
Clarke v. Larremore
CLARKE v. LARREMORE. CERTIORARI TO THE OÍROUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 51. Submitted December 16,1902. Decided February 23, 1903. Where a sheriff after selling under an execution and before paying over to the judgment c
United States v. Lynah
UNITED STATES v. LYNAH. EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 45. Argued January 9,1903. Decided February 23, 1903 All private property is held subject to the necessities of government and t
United States v. Rickert
UNITED STATES v. RICKERT. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 216. Argued January 28, 29,1903. Decided February 23, 1903. By the act of Congress of February 8, 188*7, o. 119, known as the Indian General
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.