Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1903 Cases
273 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pardee v. Aldridge
PARDEE v. ALDRIDGE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 137. Argued January 19, 20, 1903. Decided March 16, 1903. Where a railroad company mortgages its road including all a
Nashua Savings Bank v. Anglo-American Land, Mortgage & Agency Co.
NASHUA SAVINGS BANK v. ANGLO-AMERICAN LAND, MORTGAGE AND AGENCY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 167. Submitted January 29, 1903. Decided March 16, 1903. 1. The expression in section, *721 Rev.
Cambra v. Rogers
De CAMBRA v. ROGERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 170. Argued and submitted February 24, 1903. Decided March 16, 1903. In an ordinary contest between two applicants for preemption, in which the officers of the
Billingslea v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
No. 606. Robert H. Billingslea, Petitioner, v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company et al. March 9, 1903. Mr. Presley K. Ewing and Mr. Henry F. Ring for petitioners. Mr. Gardiner lathrop, Mr. Thomas R. Morrow and Mr. 8. W. Moore for respond
Board of Commissioners v. W. N. Coler & Co.
No. 247. Board of Commissioners of Wilkes County et al., Petitioners, v. W. N. Coler & Co. March 9, 1903. Mr. A. C. Avery for petitioners. Mr. John F. Dillon, Mr. Ghwrles Price, Mr. Harry Hubbard and Mr. John M. Dillon for respondents.
Brownfield v. South Carolina
BROWNFIELD v. SOUTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 172. Argued February 25, 1903. Decided March 9, 1903. Where a negro moves to quash _an indictment on the ground that he is denied the equal protect
National Bank & Loan Co. v. Petrie
NATIONAL BANK AND LOAN COMPANY v. PETRIE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 166. Argued and submitted February 24, 1903. Decided March 9, 1903. Where a national bank has sold certain bonds and the vendee has obtained
The Conemaugh
THE CONEMAUGH. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 97. Argued December 1, 2, 1902. Decided March 9, 1903. 1. In 175 U. S. 187, and 178 U. S. 317, this court held that the collision between, the Conemaugh an
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. United States
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 108. Argued January 23, 26, 1903. Decided March 9, 1903. Prior to tlie passage of the aci^of Congress “ to further regul
Kennedy Mining & Milling Co. v. Argonaut Mining Co.
KENNEDY MINING AND MILLING COMPANY v. ARGONAUT MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 49. Argued December 10, 11, 1902. Decided March 9, 1903. Where the contention is that the title to ore taken from a mi
Ferguson v. Helliesen
No. 599. William E. Ferguson et al., etc., Petitioners, v. Enoch Helliesen et al. March 2, 1903. Mr. James J. Macklin and Mr. Le Roy S. Gove for petitioners. Mr. Wilhelmus Mynderse for respondents.
Ching v. United States
No. 512. Joseph H. Ching, Petitioner, v. United States. March 2, 1903. Mr. George E. Hamilton and Mr. Adrian, Posey for petitioner. Mr. Solicitor General Richards for respondent.
Hegeman v. Springer
No. 169. Fred T. Hegeman et al., etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. John H. Springer, as Receiver, etc. Error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Submitted February 24, 1903. Decided March 2, 1903. Mr. Edwa/rd J
Pullman Co. v. Adams
PULLMAN COMPANY v. ADAMS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 138. Argued and submitted December 19, 1902. Decided March 2, 1903. By sections 3817, 3387 of the Mississippi Code of 1892, a tax is imposed “on each slee
Davis & Farnum Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles
DAVIS AND FARNUM MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. LOS ANGELES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 507. Submitted January 13, 1903. Decided March 2, 1903. 1. Where abill is based not only
United States v. Nix
UNITED STATES v. NIX. NIX v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 142, 195. Submitted December 18, 1902. Decided March 2, 1903. 1. Under sec. 829, Rev. Stat., a United States marshal may elect to be reimbursed his actual tr
The Roanoke
THE ROANOKE. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 123. Submitted December 17, 1902. Decided March 2, 1903. The following propositions in regard to lien for supplies furnished to vessels may
San José Land & Water Co. v. San José Ranch Co.
SAN JOSÉ LAND AND WATER COMPANY v. SAN JOSÉ RANCH COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUFREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 113. Submitted December 2, 1902. Decided March 2, 1903. Although no Federal right, title or immunity was specially set up
The Osceola
THE OSCEOLA. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 98. Argued December 2, 1902. Decided March 2, 1903. 1. The law both in England and America is settled as .to the following propositions: (1) That a vess
Hearne v. German Insurance
No. 593. Frank J. Hearne, Petitioner, v. German Insurance Company et al. February 23, 1903. Mr. Joseph K. MoOammon and Mr. James.H. Ha/ydm for the petitioner. Mr. William S. Dalzell, Mr. Ernest L. Tustin and Mr. J. II. Harrison for the resp
Fourth National Bank v. Albaugh
FOURTH NATIONAL BANK v. ALBAUGH. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 159. Argued January 29, 30, 1993. Decided February 23, 1903. Cross, who was president of a bank and had been misusing its funds, gave to M
Kidd v. Alabama
KIDD v. ALABAMA. EREOK TO THE SOPEEME COUET OF THE STATE OF AT.A RAMA. No. 158. Submitted January 27, 1903. Decided February 23, 1903. Section. 453, cl. 13, of the Code of 1880, and section 3911, cl. 14, of the Code of 18'96 of Alabama taxi
Home Life Insurance v. Fisher
HOME LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. FISHER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 121. Submitted December 17, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. The company defended an action on a policy of life
The Mangrove Prize Money
THE MANGROVE PRIZE MONEY. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Nos. 24, 34. Argued January 7, 8, 9, 1903. Decided February 23, 1903. Vessels more than five miles apart held not to be wit
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.