Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1903 Cases
273 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Owensboro v. Owensboro Waterworks Co.
OWENSBORO v. OWENSBORO WATERWORKS CO. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 58. Argued November 4, 5, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. The power to regulate water rates is a governmenta
Sharp v. United States
SHARP v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 208. Argued October 29, 30, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. On condemnation proceedings it was not error, under the circumstances of thi
Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. Holloway
CHOCTAW, OKLAHOMA & GULF RAILROAD COMPANY v. HOLLOWAY. ■ ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 68. Submitted November 10, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. If an employe can by the use of his eyes se
Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad v. Tennessee
CHOCTAW, OKLAHOMA & GULF RAILROAD COMPANY v. TENNESSEE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 67. Submitted November 10, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. Where it appears by an examination of the entire charge to
Hibben v. Smith
HIBBEN v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE 'SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 59. Argued November 5, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. The amount of benefits resulting from an improvement, and assessed under a state statute which this court has
Cable v. United States Life Insurance
CABLE v. UNITED STATES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEARS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 28. Argued October 16, 19, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. A corporation created by one State can transact business in a
People's National Bank v. Marye
PEOPLE’S NATIONAL BANK v. MARYE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 24. Argued October 14, 15, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. This court will follow the ruling of the highest court
McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck Co.
McLOUGHLIN v. RAPHAEL TUCK CO. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 73. Argued November 11, 12, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. The penal provisions of § 4693, R. S., as amended by the act of March 3,1891, had
Mosheuvel v. District of Columbia
MOSHEUVEL v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 6. Argued October 13, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. There is no rule of law in the District of Columbia that where a defect exists in a hig
Gertgens v. O'Connor
GERTGENS v. O’CONNOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 65. Argued November 9, 10, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. The decision of the land department in a contest case is conclusive-in the courts upon all questions
Louisville Trust Co. v. Knott
LOUISVILLE TRUST COMPANY v. KNOTT. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP KENTUCKY. No 389. Submitted October 13, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. The question of jurisdiction which the Judiciary Act
Atkin v. Kansas
ATKIN v. KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 30. Submitted May 1, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. Municipal corporations are, in every essential, only auxiliaries of the State for the purposes of local government
Warner v. Searle & Hereth Co.
WARNER v. SEARLE AND HERETH CO. APPEAL FROM THE COURT’OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 42. Argued November 2, 3, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. 1. It is the use without right of the registered trade-mark of another in foreign or In
Defiance Water Co. v. Defiance
DEFIANCE WATER COMPANY v. DEFIANCE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 21. Argued April 22, 1903. Decided November 30, 1903. The fundamental question of jurisdiction, first, of this cou
National Surety Co. v. United States
No. 423. National Surety Company of Kansas City, Missouri, Petitioner, v. United States. November 16, 1903. Mr. Heber J. May and Mr. Robert T. Hough for petitioner. The Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for respondent.
Battle v. Atkinson
No. 72. Mollie S. Battle, Plaintiff in Error, v. Robert G. Atkinson. Argued for plaintiff in error November 11, 1903. Decided November 16, 1903. Mr. John M. Taylor for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.
Allen v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.
ALLEN v. PULLMAN’S PALACE CAR COMPANY. ERROR TO THE .CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 27. Argued October 16, 1903. Decided November 16, 1903. A State may not impose a tax -which is in any way a bu
Missouri v. Dockery
MISSOURI v. DOCKERY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 180. Argued October 27, 1903. Decided November 16, 1903. The rights of an individual under the Fourteenth Amendment turn on the power of th'e State. A State does
St. Louis Hay & Grain Co. v. United States
ST. LOUIS HAY AND GRAIN CO. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No 41. Argued October 30, November 2, 1903. Decided November 16, 1903. When a void but not illegal contract of sale has been performed on both sides, the vendor
City of Joplin v. Southwest Missouri Light Co.
CITY OF JOPLIN v. SOUTHWEST MISSOURI LIGHT COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 32. Argued October 20, 1903. Decided November 16, 1903. Restraints upon governmental agencies w
Smith v. Indiana
SMITH v. INDIANA. Ej^HOR TO the SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 81. Argued October 22, 23, 1903. Decided November 16, 1903. The extent of the power public officer to question the constitutionality of a state statute as an excusl'
Howard v. Fleming
HOWARD v. FLEMING. HOWARD v. NORTH CAROLINA. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP NORTH' CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NORTH CAROLINA. Nos. 44, 45. Argued October 27, 1903. De
Continental National Bank v. Buford
CONTINENTAL NATIONAL BANK OF MEMPHIS v. BUFORD. ERROR TO THE ■ CIRCUIT'COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 60. Argued November 6, 1903. Decided November 16, 1903. On every writ of error or appeal the first and fundamental question
Holden v. Stratton
HOLDEN v. STRATTON. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 38. Submitted October 22, 1903. Decided November 16, 1903. •Appeals to this court from decrees of the Circuit Courts of Appeals revising proceedings of
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.