Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1903 Cases
273 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gilbert v. American Surety Co.
No. 683. James H. Gilbert, Sheriff, Petitioner, v. American Surety Company of New York et al. June 1, 1903. Mr. Lynden Evans and Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for petitioner. Mr. T. A. Moran, Mr. Levy Mayer and Mr. Alfred S. Austrian for respond
Hutchinson v. Otis
HUTCHINSON v. OTIS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 634. Submitted May 4, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. A creditor obtained attachments against one who within .four months thereafter w.as adjudged a bankrup
Queenan v. Oklahoma
QUEENAN v. OKLAHOMA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 246. Argued April 16, 17, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. 1.' A witness for the defence in a murder trial, who is not an expert, but who knew the prisoner before
Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.
GLOBE REFINING COMPANY v. LANDA COTTON OIL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 241. Submitted April 16, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. In case of a breach of contract a person can onl
Stanly County v. Coler
STANLY COUNTY v. COLER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 264. Argued April 27, 28, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. While as a general rule Federal courts will accept tbe interpretation put by tbe courts of
Geer v. Mathieson Alkali Works
GEER v. MATHIESON ALKALI WORKS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 261. Submitted April 24, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. On the authority of Conley v. Mathieson Alkali Works, ante, p
United States v. Michigan
UNITED STATES v. MICHIGAN. ORIGINAL. IN EQUITY. No. 11. Argued April 20, 21, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. The effect of the legislation of Congress granting a right of way through a military reservation and 730,000 acres of public lands to b
Blackfeather v. United States
BLACKFEATHER v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 276. Argued May 1, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. The moral obligations Of the government towards the Indians are for Congress alone to recognize, and the courts can exercise
Buchanan v. Patterson
BUCHANAN v. PATTERSON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 266. Argued April 29, 30, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. An administratrix of one wlio in 1818 became a member of a firm which had in' 1798 sustained losses, re
Dunbar v. Dunbar
DUNBAR v. DUNBAR. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 244. Argued April 16, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. After obtaining d divorce on the ground of his wife’s desertion, she not opposing the decree, the husband’ ex
Lockwood v. Exchange Bank
LOCKWOOD v. EXCHANGE BANK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 226. Argued April 7, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. Under the bankruptcy act of 1898, the title to property of a bankrupt ■which is generally exem
Mifflin v. Dutton
MIFFLIN v. DUTTON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 267. Argued April 30, May 1, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. The preceding case, Mifflin v. R. H. White Co., ante, p. 260, followed, and held, that under the
Mifflin v. R. H. White Co.
MIFFLIN v. R. H. WHITE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 268. Argued April 30, May 1, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. The serial publication of an author’s work in a magazine with his consent and befor
Snyder v. Bettman
SNYDER v. BETTMAN. ERROR TO THE COURT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 230. Argued April 7, 8, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. This court has.determined that Congress., has.-power, to tax successions; that the S
Hawaii v. Mankichi
HAWAII v. MANKICHI. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 219. Argued March 4, 5, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. In interpreting, a statute the intention of the lawmaking power will prevail even a
Johanson v. Washington
JOHANSON v. WASHINGTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 282. Argued May 1, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. Whether one assuming to act for a State or Territory in selecting school lands in lieu of sections 16 and 36 h
Patterson v. Eudora
PATTERSON v. BARK EUDORA. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 278. Argued May 1, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. The title is no part of a statute. Where a statute declares that it shall apply to foreign ves
Atlantic & Pacific Telegraph Co. v. Philadelphia
ATLANTIC AND PACIFIC TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. PHILADELPHIA. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 163. Argued February 24, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. The following propositions .as to the
Bockfinger v. Foster
BOCKFINGER v. FOSTER. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 175. Argued February 26, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. Until the title to lands within any townsite boundary has been finally dis-poséd of as provided in th
Tennessee v. Virginia
TENNESSEE v. VIRGINIA. ORIGINAL. IN EQUITY. No. 6. Submitted May 18, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. Report of commissioners appointed to ascertain, retrace, re-mark, and reestablish the real, certain and true boundary line between the States o
Wright v. Henkel
WRIGHT v. HENKEL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 661. Argued April 28, 29, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. 1. The general principle of international law in cases of extradition is't
Tubman v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
TUBMAN v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 574. Submitted May 18, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. 1. The general rule is that a final judgment cannot be set aside by the court w
O'Neal v. United States
O’NEAL v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 534. Submitted May 4, 1903. Decided June 1, 1903. This was a proceeding in contempt and the contention was that on the facts
Ocean Steamship Co. v. Crooks
No. 685. Ocean Steamship Company, Petitioner, v. John Richard Crooks. May 18, 1903. Mr. Julien T. Davies and Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for petitioner. Mr. Henry Galbraith Ward for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.