Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1903 Cases
273 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Eckington & Soldiers' Home Railway Co. v. McDevitt
ECKINGTON AND SOLDIERS' HOME RAILWAY CO. v. McDEVITT. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 9. Argued January 21, 1903; resubmitted March 9, 1903. Decided November 16, 1903. Plaintiff (below) contracted with defenda
Armour Packing Co. v. Adams
No. 70. Armour Packing Company et al., Appellants, v. B. T. Adams et al. November 9, 1903. Mr. Marion W. Harris for appellants. Mr. Olin J. Wimberly for appellees.
Ex parte Joins
Ex parte JOINS. PETITION FOR Á WRIT OF PROHIBITION AND FOR CERTIORARI AGAINST THE CHOCTAW AND CHICKASAW CITIZENSHIP COURT. No. 12. Original. Argued October 19. Decided November 9, 1903. A writ of prohibition will not be issued to an inferio
United States v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad
UNITED STATES v. DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 20. Argued October 14, 1903. Decided November 9, 1903. Where, in an action by the United States against a railroad corpo
Kinney v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'n
KINNEY v. COLUMBIA SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION. APPEAL .PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT' OP UTAH. No. 102. Submitted October 13, 1903. Decided November 9, 1903. Petitions and bonds for removal are in the nature o
Hubbert v. Campbellsville Lumber Co.
HUBBERT v. CAMPBELLSVILLE LUMBER CO. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 31. Argued October 20, 1903. Decided November 9, 1903. A statute authorizing an issue of municipal bonds was amended by an act increa
Yee Ngoy v. United States
No. 114. Yee Ngoy, Appellant, v. United States. November 2, 1903. Dismissed per stipulation, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for the appellee. Mr. Lyman I. Mowry for appellant. The Attorney General for ap-pellee.
In re City of Palatka
No. —. Original. Ex parte. In the Matter of City of Palatka, Petitioner. November 2, 1903. Mr. H. Bisbee and Mr. George C. Bedell for petitioner in support of motion. Mr. Charles T. Cates, Jr., Mr. Henry Strum and Mr. R..E. L. Mountcastle o
Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDade
CHOCTAW, OKLAHOMA AND GULF R. R. CO. v. McDADE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 26. Submitted October 14, 1903. Decided November 2, 1903. It is the duty of a railroad company to use due care to provide a rea
Ross v. Aguirre
ROSS v. AGUIRRE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 19. Argued October 14, 1903. Decided November 2, 1903. Under the decisions of the highest court of California, an act of legis-
Boston Tow Boat Co. v. Chase Machine Co.
No. 432. Boston Tow Boat Company, Petitioner, v. Chase Machine Company. October 26, 1903. Mr. Harvey D. Goulder for petitioner. Mr. T. W. Bakewell and Mr. Albert E. Lynch for respondent.
Wright v. Morgan
WRIGHT v. MORGAN. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.' No. 13. Argued October 13, 14, 1903. Decided October 26, 1903. An act of Congress entitled “ An act to enable tbe City of Denver to purchase cert
The Robert W. Parsons
THE ROBERT W. PARSONS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 16. Argued March 11, 12. Decided October 26, 1903. 1. Although the Erie Canal is wholly within the state of New York, it connects navigable waters and is a grea
Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.
No. 417. Harry Donovan et al., Petitioners, v. Pennsylvania Company. October 19, 1903. Mr. James B. Ward for petitioners. Mr. Edgar A. Bancroft, Mr. F. J. Loesch and Mr. O. F- Loesch for respondent.
United States ex rel. Regina Music Box Co. v. Allen
No. 420. United States ex rel. Regina Music Box Company, Petitioner, v. Frederick I. Allen, Commissioner of Patents. October 19, 1903. Mr. Antonio Knauth for petitioner. The Attorney General and Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for respondent.
Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. v. Martin
No. 402. Berwind-White Coal Mining Company, Petitioner, v. John C. Martin. October 19, 1903. Mr. Frank P. Prichard for petitioner. Mr. Rudolph M. Schick for respondents.
Treece v. American Ass'n
No. 304. Alfred N. Treece et al., Petitioners, v. American Association et al. October 19, 1903. Mr. Jerome Templeton for petitioners. Mr. Jesse L. Rogers for respondents.
Exchange Bank v. Clayton
No. 271. Exchange Bank of Macon, Petitioner, v. E. L. Clayton et al., Trustees. October 19, 1903. Mr. Olin J. Wimberly and Mr. A. O. Bacon for petitioner. Mr. Frederick C. Foster for respondents.
Douglas Co. v. Stone
No. 10. Douglas Company, Appellant, v. A. F. Stone, Late Treasurer, etc. Argued October 13, 1903. Decided October 19, 1903. Mr. Daniel Trigg and Mr. J. H. Gilmore for appellant. Mr. William A. Anderson for appellee.
The Southwark
THE SOUTHWARK CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 12. Argued March 3, 1903. Decided October 19, 1903. Before the passage of the Harter Act, 27 Stat. 445, there was, in the absence of special contract, an ab
Paine v. Foster
No. 15. Veeder B. Paine, Appellant, v. John Foster et al., Trustees, etc. October 13, 1903. Mr. James R. Keaton and Mr. S. D. Luchett for,appellants. No appearance for ap-pellees.
Jeung Juen Ho v. United States
No. 439. Jeung Juen Ho, Plaintiff in Error, v. United States. October 13, 1903. Docketed and dismissed, on motion of Mr. Solicitor General Hoyt for the defendant in error. No counsel opposing.
Western Electric Supply Co. v. Abbeville Electric Light & Power Co.
No. 359. Western Electric Supply Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Abbeville Electric Light and Power Company. July 15, 1903. Docketed and dismissed on motion of Mr. W. N. Gray don for defendant in error. No counsel opposing.
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Devore
No. 709. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Petitioner, v. Eston E. Devore, etc. June 1, 1903. Mr. William D. Guthrie and Mr. Walter W. Ross for petitioner. Mr. William M. Offley for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.