Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1906 Cases
239 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ex parte Chicago Title & Trust Co.
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of The Chicago Title and Trust Company, Petitioner. January 2, 1906. Mr. Joseph E. Baden and Mr. Newton Wyeth for petitioner. Mr. Henry S. Robbins, Mr: Wallace Heckman and Mr. James G. Elsdon for res
Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Bohon
CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. BOHON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 177. Argued December 15, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. Alabama Southern Railway v. Thompson, ante, p: 206, foll
Alabama Great Southern Railway Co. v. Thompson
ALABAMA GREAT SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. THOMPSON. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 58. Argued November 9, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. A question certified must be one the answer to which is to ai
United States ex rel. Hill v. American Surety Co.
UNITED STATES, FOR THE USE OF HILL, v. AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF KING COUNTY, STATE OF Washington. No. 39. Submitted November 3, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. The act of August 13, 1894, 28 Stat. 2
Ballmann v. Fagin
BALLMANN v. FAGIN. BALLMANN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Nos. 240, 308. No. 240 a
Cincinnati, Portsmouth, Big Sandy & Pomeroy Packet Co. v. Bay
CINCINNATI, PORTSMOUTH, BIG SANDY AND POMEROY PACKET COMPANY v. BAY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 174. Argued December 15, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. Where it appears from the record of a case in a state court th
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Deer
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. DEER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. No. 164. Submitted December 14, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. Harris v. Balk, 198 U. S.. 215, followed to the effect -that full faith an
Howard v. Kentucky
HOWARD v. KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 77. Argued November 10, 13, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. The provisions of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the-Federal Constitution do not apply to proceedi
Mead v. Portland
MEAD v. PORTLAND. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. No. 56. Argued November 27, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. Owners of property erected wharves on the line of an adjoining street on the river front in Portland under ordin
Speer v. Colbert
SPEER v. COLBERT. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 153. Argued December 13, 14, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. Institutions incorporated under special acts of Congress take their character from the act incor
Montana Catholic Missions v. Missoula County
MONTANA CATHOLIC MISSIONS v. MISSOULA COUNTY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA. No. 151. Submitted December 13, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. In order that the Circuit Court may have jurisdiction
Succession of Serralles v. Esbri
SUCCESSION OF SERRALLES v. ESBRI. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. No. 65. Argued November 27, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. A Porto Rican contracted, in 1894, to pay a certain amount of pesos in money current in the commerce,
Herrick v. Boquillas Land & Cattle Co.
HERRICK v. BOQUILLAS LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 105. Submitted December 7, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. On appeal from the Supreme Court of a Territory the jurisdiction of this
Campbell v. California
CAMPBELL v. CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 70. Argued November 27, 28, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. The California inheritance tax law of 1893, as amended in 1899, which imposed a tax on inheritance
Kolze v. Hoadley
KOLZE v. HOADLEY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 91. Submitted December 5, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. In c'onstruing,4 1 of the act of August 13, 1888, which provides that C
Howard v. Perrin
HOWARD v. PERRIN. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 110. Submitted December 6, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906 Under the Atlantic & Pacific Railroad Company land grant act of July 27, 1866, title to land within th
Guardian Trust & Deposit Co. v. Fisher
GUARDIAN TRUST AND DEPOSIT COMPANY v. FISHER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 75. Argued November 28, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. Section 1255 of the Code of North Carolina of 1883 provides that mor
Peoria Gas & Electric Co. v. Peoria
PEORIA GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY v. PEORIA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 33. Argued October 30, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. A gas company brought an action against a city in
Owensboro Waterworks Co. v. Owensboro
OWENSBORO WATERWORKS COMPANY v. OWENSBORO. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 145. Submitted December 13, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. Maladministration of its local affairs by a c
Knoxville Water Co. v. Knoxville
KNOXVILLE WATER COMPANY v. KNOXVILLE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 123. Argued December 11, 12, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. Where the bill properly sets forth the facts on
Nutt v. Knut
NUTT v. KNUT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 78. Argued November 29, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. An attorney was employed to prosecute a claim against the United States; the contract which was in writing prov
Albright v. Territory of New Mexico ex rel. Sandoval
ALBRIGHT v. TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO ex rel. SANDOVAL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 229. Submitted November 27, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. The renewal in this court of a motion to dismiss the appeal w
United States ex rel. Drury v. Lewis
UNITED STATES ex rel. DRURY v. LEWIS, WARDEN OF THE COMMON JAIL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 126. Argued December 12, 1905. Decided January 2, 1906. An officer and an enli
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.