Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1906 Cases
239 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Fisher ex rel. Barcelon v. Baker
FISHER, ON BEHALF OF BARCELON, v. BAKER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 214. Argued October 9, 10. Decided December 3, 1906. When an application on habeas corpus is denied because the writ had been suspended, and
United States v. Michigan
No. 4, Original. The United States, Complainant, v. The State of Michigan. November 19, 1906. The Attorney General for complainant. Mr. Horace M. Oren and Mr. Charles A. Blair for defendant.
Mercantile Trust Co. v. Wheeler
No. 490. Mercantile Trust Company et al., Petitioners, v. Samuel P. Wheeler, Receiver, etc. November 19, 1906. Mr. Philip Barton Warren and Mr. Bluford Wilson for petitioners. No appearance for respondent.
James McCreery Realty Corp. v. Equitable National Bank
No. 109. The James McCreery Realty Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Equitable National Bank. Submitted November 16, 1906. Decided November 19, 1906. Mr. Eugene C. Kremer for plaintiff in error. Mr. Charles A.. Hess for defendant in e
Clark v. Wells
CLARK v. WELLS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA. No. 42. Submitted October 18, 1906. Decided November 19, 1906. No valid judgment- in personam, can be rendered against a defendant without personal
National Council of the Junior Order of United American Mechanics of the United States v. State Council of Virginia, Junior Order of United American Mechanics of the Virginia
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF THE JUNIOR ORDER OF UNITED AMERICAN MECHANICS OF THE UNITED STATES v. STATE COUNCIL OF VIRGINIA, JUNIOR ORDER OF UNITED AMERICAN MECHANICS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT- OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF
Goudy v. Meath
GOUDY v. MEATH. ERROR TO THE-SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP WASHINGTON. No. 53. Submitted October 23, 1906. Decided November 19, 1906. Where a State by statute makes' the allotted lands of Indians alienable the same as lands of citizens, and
Conboy v. First National Bank
CONBOY v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JERSEY CITY. APPEAL from the circuit court of appeals for the second CIRCUIT. No. 54. Argued October 23,1906. Decided November 19, 1906. Congress having provided by section 256 of the Bankruptcy Act that app
United States v. Riggs
UNITED STATES v. RIGGS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 167. Argued October 23, 1906. Decided November 12, 1906. Under par. 313, as construed in connection with pars. 306, 307 of the Tariff Act of July
Burt v. Smith
BURT v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 67. Argued October 29, 1906. Decided November 12, 1906. A mistaken view of the law may constitute probable cause in some instances — probable cause does mean suffici
Andrews v. Eastern Oregon Land Co.
ANDREWS v. EASTERN OREGON LAND COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE' STATE OF OREGON. - No. 48. Argued October 19, 1906. Decided November 12, 1906. Although the record of a case here on writ of error may fail to show how the facts on
Taylor v. Burns
TAYLOR v. BURNS. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF • ARIZONA. No. 28. Submitted October 16, 1906. Decided November 12, 1906. The word “sell” in an agreement affecting, but not in terms granting or conveying, real’estate will
Keel v. Douville
No. 68. W. S. Keel, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. E. E. Douville. Argued October 29 and 30, 1906. Decided November 5, 1906. Mr. Wm. R. Harper, Mr. D. W. Harper and Mr. E. M. Barber for appellants. Mr. Walter J. Gez and Mr. E. J. Bowers for ap
Commissioners of Wicomico County v. Bancroft
COMMISSIONERS OF WICOMICO COUNTY v. BANCROFT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT- OP APPEALS POE THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 129. Argued October 9, 1906. Decided November 5, 1906. In the absence of a contract protected by the impairment clause of
Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Hager
COVINGTON AND CINCINNATI BRIDGE COMPANY v. HAGER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR .THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP KENTUCKY.’ No. 37. Submitted October 17, 1906. Decided November 5, 1906. Circuit Courts of the United States, unt
Northern Assurance Co. of London v. Grand View Building Ass'n
NORTHERN ASSURANCE COMPANY OF LONDON v. GRAND VIEW BUILDING ASSOCIATION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEBRASKA. No. 40. Argued October 18, 19, 1906. Decided November 5, 1906. An adjudication in ah action at law on a policy of
In re Moran
MATTER OF MORAN, PETITIONER. No. 8, Original. Argued October 15, 1906. Decided November 5, 1906. Where the order of the court having authority to designate the place of trial for a newly organized county in Oklahoma is as precise as circums
Red Bird v. United States
CHEROKEE INTERMARRIAGE CASES. RED BIRD et al., CITIZENS OF THE CHEROKEE NATION BY BLOOD, v. UNITED STATES. CHEROKEE NATION v. UNITED STATES. FITE et al., INTERMARRIED WHITE PERSONS, CLAIMING TO BE ENTITLED TO CITIZENSHIP IN THE CHEROKEE NAT
Cole v. City of Indianapolis
No. 465. Rosa M. Cole, Executrix, etc., Petitioner, v. The City of Indianapolis et al. October 29, 1906. Mr. Ferdinand Winter and Mr. Alexander C. Ayres for petitioner. Mr. Frederick E. Matson, Mr. Henry Warrurn and Mr. Merrill Moores for r
Strong v. Buffalo Land & Exploration Co.
No. 36. Hugh P. Strong et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Buffalo Land and Exploration Company. Submitted October 18, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Mr. J. M. Vale, Mr. John Brennan, Mr. Moses E. Clapp and Mr. Newel H. Clapp for plaintiff in
Wilson ex rel. Territory of Arizona v. Vickers
No. 7. Thomas F. Wilson (on Behalf of the Territory of Arizona), Appellant, v. George W. Vickers et al. Submitted October 11, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. Mr. Eugene S. Ives for appellant. Mr. C. F. Ainsworth for appellees.
Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance v. Clark
FIDELITY MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CLARK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 25. Argued October 15, 16, 1906. Decided October 29, 1906. A man and his sister conspired to defraud
Gallagher v. Illinois
No. 20. William J. Gallagher, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of Illinois. October 22, 1906. Mr. Charles H. Soelke for plaintiff in error. Mr. Erasmus C. Lindley for defendants in error.
Rosenberger v. Harris
No. 366. Abram Rosenberger, Petitioner, v. Joseph H. Harris. October 22, 1906. Mr. J. J. Darlington and Mr. James C.-Jones for petitioner. The Attorney General,- The Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Robb for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.