Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1906 Cases
239 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
First National Bank v. Converse
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OTTAWA v. CONVERSE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 176. Argued January 25, 1906. Decided February 19, 1906. A Minnesota manufacturing corporation having fail
Rector v. Commercial National Bank
RECTOR v. COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 138. Submitted December 12, 1905. Decided February 19, 1906. Rector V. City Deposit Ranh, ante, p.- 405, followed. The facts are stated in the opinion.
Rector v. City Deposit Bank Co.
RECTOR v. CITY DEPOSIT BANK COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 137. Submitted December 12, 1905. Decided February 19, 1906. Where a trustee in bankruptcy seeks to recover in a state court what is asserted to be an
New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. Interstate Commerce Commission
NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRG
Southern Pacific Railroad v. United States
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 142. Argued January 24, 25, 1906. Decided February 19, 1906. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United States, No. 1, ante, p.
Southern Pacific Railroad v. United States
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 141. Argued January 24, 1906. Decided February 19, 1906. Although a suit in equity cannot 'be maintained where there is
United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.
UNITED STATES v. DETROIT TIMBER AND LUMBER COMPANY. MARTIN-ALEXANDER LUMBER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL AND CROSS APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 106, 165. Argued December 7, 1905. Decided February
Martin v. Texas
MARTIN v. TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 170. Submitted January 25, 1906. Decided February 19, 1906. While an accused person of African descent on trial in a state court is entitled under the Consti
Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. San Francisco
HIBERNIA SAVINGS & LOAN SOCIETY v. SAN FRANCISCO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 154. Submitted December 14, 1905. Decided January 29, 1906. The principle that the States cannot, tax official agencies of the Fede
Raymond v. United States
No. 526. Albert M. Raymond, Petitioner, v. The United States. January 22, 1906. Mr. Levi H. David for petitioner. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for respondent.
Jones v. Vane
No. 405. George H. Jones, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Vane et al. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted January 15, 1906. Decided January 22, 1906. Mr. William T. Birdsall for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. M. Stockslager and Mr. George C.
San Antonio Traction Co. v. Altgelt
SAN ANTONIO TRACTION COMPANY v. ALTGELT. IN ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 131. Argued December 13, 1905. Decided January 22, 1906. Even though an ordinance extending
Carfer v. Caldwell
CARFER, SHERIFF, v. CALDWELL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 360. Submitted January 8, 1906. Decided January 22, 1906. As the jurisdiction of courts of the United States to
Esquibel v. Chaves
No. 181. Jose S. Esquibel, Appellant, v. Francisco S. Chaves. January 19, 1906. Mr. Frank 8. Bright for .appellant. No appearance for appellee.
Siegel v. New York & Harlem Railroad
No. 407. No. 453. No. 454. No. 493. Anna Siegel, Plaintiff in Error, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al.; Hedewig Kriete, Plaintiff in Error, v. The New York and Harlem Railroad Company et al.; David W. O’Neil et al., Plainti
Thomas v. Provident Life & Trust Co.
No. 528. No. 529. Jesse Thomas, Petitioner, v. The Provident Life and Trust Company et al.; and Lucy L. Wickham, Petitioner, v. The Provident Life and Trust Company et al. January 15, 1906. Mr. Charles S. Fogg for petitioner' in No. 528 and
Guss v. Nelson
GUSS v. NELSON. APPEAL FROM, AND IN ERROR TO, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 124. Argued December 12, 1905. Decided January 15, 1906. Oklahoma City v. McMaster, 196 U. S. 529, followed, to effect that the review by this
Gunter v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
GUNTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 88. Argued December 1, 4, 1905. Decided January 15,
Last Chance Mining Co. v. Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co.
No. 260. The Last Chance Mining Company et al., Petitioners, v. Bunker Hill and Sullivan Mining and Concentrating Company. January 8, 1906. Mr. George Turner and Mr. W. B. Heyburn for petitioners. Mr. Curtis H. Bindley, Mr. Henry Eickhojf a
Warner v. Grayson
WARNER v. GRAYSON. TALBOTT v. GRAYSON. WOOD v. GRAYSON. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 89, 90, 439. Argued December 4, 5, 1905. Decided January 8, 1906. An owner of two adjoining parcels obtained on one
Carter v. Hawaii
CARTER v. HAWAII. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 144. Argued December 13, 1905. Decided January 8, 1906. Damon v. Hawaii, 194 U. S. 154,'followed to effect that under the Hawaiian Act, of 1846; “of Public and Pri
Graham v. Folsom
GRAHAM, COUNTY AUDITOR FOR GREENWOOD COUNTY, v. FOLSOM. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 108. Argued December 8, 1905. Decided January 8, 1906. The power of the State .to alter or destr
Hallenborg v. Cobre Grande Copper Co.
HALLENBORG v. COBRE GRANDE COPPER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 87. Argued November 29, December 1, 1905. Decided January 8, 1906. This was a minority stockholder’s suit to set aside a contract made
Armour Packing Co. v. Lacy
ARMOUR PACKING COMPANY v. LACY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 53. Argued November 8, 1905. Decided January 8, 1906. The construction, by the highest court of a State, that a license tax imposed on meat packi
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.