Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1906 Cases
239 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
McAlister v. Henkel
McALISTER v. HENKEL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 341. Argued January 4, 5, 1906. Decided March 12, 1906. Hale v. Henkel, ante, p. 43, followed, as to the inquisitorial powers
Hale v. Henkel
HALE v. HENKEL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 340. Argued January 4, 5, 1906. Decided March 12, 1906. Under the practice in this country, the examination of witnesses by a Fede
Territory of New Mexico v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. No. 182. Argued January 26, 1906. Decided March 12, 1906. Plaintiff sued in the District Court of a Terr
Kentucky v. Powers
KENTUCKY v. POWERS. Ex parte COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, PETITIONER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 393, Submitted; No. 15, Original, Argued, January
Louisiana v. Mississippi
LOUISIANA v. MISSISSIPPI. IN EQUITY. No. 11, Original. Argued October 10, 11, 12, 1905. — Decided March 5, 1906. The act of Congress admitting Louisiana having given that State all islands within three leagues of her coast, and the subseque
Dyer v. Mayor of Baltimore
No. 377. Sidney Turner Dyer, by Elisha Dyer, Jr., her Next Friend, et al., Appellants, v. The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for • the District of Maryland. March 5, 1906. Dismi
Town of Fletcher v. Hickman
No. 601. The Town of Fletcher, Petitioner, v. Samuel G. Hickman. March 5, 1906. Pétition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. Robert W. Bonynge and Mr. Halsted L. Ritter f
Galbraith v. Illinois Steel Co.
No. 431. Fannie D. Galbraith, Petitioner, v. Illinois Steel Company. March 5, 1906. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals fpr the Seventh-Circuit denied. Mr. Adams A. Goodrich for petitioner. Mr. Wi
In re Columbia George & Toy Toy
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Columbia George and Toy Toy, Petitioners. March 5, 1906. Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of habeas corpus denied. Mr. A. E. Crane and Mr. F. T. Woodburn for petitioners.
United States v. Clark
UNITED STATES v. CLARK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 359. Argued January 9, 10, 1906 Decided March 5, 1906. The rule that this court will not disturb findings of fact where both the ■ 'Circuit Court an
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Illinois ex rel. Drainage Commissioners
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ex rel. DRAINAGE COMMISSIONERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 157. Argued December 14, 1905. Decided March 5, 1906. The failure of
Duncan Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Siemens-Halske Electric Co. of America
No. 571. Duncan Electric Manufacturing Company et al., Petitioners, v. Siemens-Halske Electric Company of America. February 26, 1906. Mr. Robert H. Parkinson for petitioners. Mr. Drury W. Cooper and Mr. Thomas B. Kerr for respondent.
German Savings & Loan Society v. Tull
No. 505. The German Savings and Loan Society, Petitioner, v. William L. Tull et al. February 26, 1906. Mr. Francis J. Heney for petitioner. Mr. Robert A. Howard, Mr. L. G. .Nash and Mr. Samuel R. Stern for respondents.
Southern Pacific Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAILWAY COMPANY v. SAME. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. SAME. SANTA FE PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. SAME. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. SAME. APP
Kawamanakoa v. Polyblank
No. 597. David Kawamanakoa et al., Appellants, v. Ellen Albertino Polyblank, etc., et al. February 19, 1906. No one opposing.
Goshorn v. Royal Trust Co.
No. 556. Frederick S. Goshorn et al., Petitioners, v. Royal Trust Company et al. February 19, 1906. Mr. Henry W. Leman for petitioners. Mr. Frank H. Scott and Mr. Edgar A. Bancroft for respondents.
Whitney v. Dresser
WHITNEY v. DRESSER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 180. Argued January 26, 1906. Decided February 19, 1906. Bankruptcy proceedings are more summary than ordinary suits, and a sworn proof of claim agains
Strickley v. Highland Boy Gold Mining Co.
STRICKLEY v. HIGHLAND BOY GOLD MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH. No. 172. Argued January 25, 1906. Decided February 19, 1906. If a state'statute as construed by the highest court of the State is constitutional
Missouri v. Illinois
MISSOURI v. ILLINOIS AND THE SANITARY DISTRICT OF CHICAGO. No. 4, Original. Argued January 2, 3, 4, 1906. Decided February 19, 1906. Missouri filed its bill in this court to enjoin Illinois and the Sanitary Dis■trict of Chicago from dischar
United States v. New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co.
UNITED STATES v. NEW YORK AND CUBA MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 116. Argued January 22, 23, 1906. Decided February 19, 1906. Payment of an illegal demand
Looney v. Metropolitan Railroad
LOONEY v. METROPOLITAN RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 173. Argued December 14, 15, 1905. Decided February 19, 1906. In an action for damages for personal injuries while the defendant has the
United States v. Bitter Root Development Co.
UNITED STATES v. BITTER ROOT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 223. Argued January 8, 9, 1906. Decided February 19, 1906. Notwithstanding averments in the bill of fraud, conspiracy and
Travelers Insurance v. Prewitt
TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. PREWITT, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 184. Argued January 16, 1906. Decided February 19, 1906. Security-Life.Ins. Co. v. Preioitt, ante, p. 44
Security Mutual Life Insurance v. Prewitt
SECURITY MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PREWITT, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 178. Argued January 16, 1906. Decided February 19, 1906. Where, in a suit to cancel the-revoc
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.