Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1906 Cases
239 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Naganab v. Hitchcock
NAGANAB v. HITCHCOCK. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 247. Argued April 25, 1906. Decided May 21, 1906. A suit brought by a Chippewa Indian on behalf of himself and other members of his tribe against the Se
Vicksburg v. Vicksburg Waterworks Co.
VICKSBURG v. VICKSBURG WATERWORKS COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 133. Submitted December 13, 1905. Decided May 21, 1906. Where complainant’s bill discloses an intent
Cox v. Texas
COX v. TEXAS. COX v. THOMPSON. ERROR TO THE COURT OP CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. Nos. 266, 267. Argued April 27, 1906. Decided May 21, 1906. The provisions in the liquor tax law of 1895 of Te
Santa Fe Pacific Railroad v. Holmes
SANTA FE PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. HOLMES. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES OIROtJTT COURT OR APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 235. Argued April 18, 19, 1906. Decided May 21, 1906. The duty of the master to furnish safe places for the employé
Millard v. Roberts
MILLARD v. ROBERTS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 234. Argued April 18, 1906. Decided May 21, 1906. Revenue bills, within the meaning of the constitutional provision that they must originate in the House
Ayer & Lord Tie Co. v. Kentucky
AYER AND LORD TIE COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 268. Argued April 27, 1906. — Decided May 21, 1906. The general rule as to vessels plying between the ports of different Sta
James v. United States
JAMES v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 215. Argued April 6, 9, 1906. Decided May 21, 1906. Without deciding whether the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia is or is not an inferior court of the' United States wit
Burton v. United States
BURTON v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 539. Argued April 3, 4, 1906. Decided May 21, 1906. Congress has power to make it an offense against the United States for a
Ortega v. Lara
ORTEGA v. LARA. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE, UNITED STATES. POR THE DISTRICT OP PORTO RICO. No. 230. Argued April 17, 18, 1906. — Decided May 21, 1906. Where jurisdiction of a writ of error to review a judgment of the District Court
Wishkah Boom Co. v. United States
No. 253. Wishkah Boom Company, Appellant, v. The United States. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.. Argued April 25 and 26, 1906. Decided May 14, 1906. Mr. Austin E. Griffiths for appellant. The At
Devine v. Los Angeles
DEVINE v. LOS ANGELES. APpEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 207. Argued March 13, 1906. — Decided May 14, 1906. Where diversity of citizenship does not exist a suit can only be main
United States v. Dieckerhoff
UNITED STATES v. DIECKERHOFF. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECt OND CIRCUIT. No. 228. Argued April 17, 1906. Decided May 14, 1906. A bond given by an importer to a collector of customs and purporting to be executed und
Merchants' National Bank v. Wehrmann
MERCHANTS’ NATIONAL BANK OF CINCINNATI v. WEHRMANN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 256. Argued April 26, 1906. Decided May 14, 1906. Where a national bank sued for debts of a partnership, sharés of which it had taken a
Halsell v. Renfrow
HALSELL v. RENFROW. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 254. Submitted April 20, 1906. — Decided May 14, 1906. Where the court of first instance in a Territory sees the witnesses the full court deals with its fin
Pearson v. Williams
PEARSON v. WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION. WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ’ No. 237. Argued April 19, 20, 1906. Decided May 14, 1906. The Secretary of Commerce a
Hulbert v. City of Chicago
HULBERT v. CITY OF CHICAGO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 248. Submitted April 25, 1906. Decided May 14, 1906. The mere claim in objections to confirmation of. a rule in a proceeding in the County Court to confirm
Gila Bend Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Gila Water Co.
GILA BEND RESERVOIR AND IRRIGATION COMPANY v GILA WATER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 226. Argued April 12, 16, 1906. Decided May 14, 1906. The absence of a formal order by the court need not necess
Security Mutual Life Insurance v. Prewitt
SECURITY MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PREWITT, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD v. SAME. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. Nos. 178, 184. Argued January 16, 1
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Mugg
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MUGG. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE SECOND SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. ' No. 233. Submitted April 18, 1906. Decided May 14, 1906. One obtaining from a common carrier tr
Darlington v. Turner
DARLINGTON v. TURNER. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE BISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 196. Argued March 6, 7, 1906. — Decided May 14, 1906. Although the auditor and both courts below, found that plaintiff in error’s testator had been guil
United States v. Cornell Steamboat Co.
UNITED STATES v. CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 239. Argued April 20, 1906. Decided May 14, 1906. While a claim for salvage of Government property based on services rendered
In re Lincoln
In re LINCOLN, PETITIONER. PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS. No. 21, Original. Submitted April 23, 1906. — Decided May 14, 1906. There petitioner’s term of imprisonment has expired, but under the sentence he is still subject to confinem
United States v. Milliken Imprinting Co.
UNITED STATES v. MILLIKEN IMPRINTING COMPANY. APPEAL FORM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 227. Argued April 16, 17, 1906. Decided April 30, 1906. A corporation having a contract with the Government to imprint revenue stamps received notice as to r
McHarg v. Staake
McHARG, RECEIVER, et al., v. STAAKE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 214. Argued March 15, 16, 1906, Decided April 30, 1906. This case was argued simultaneously with First National Bank v. Staake; for
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.