Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1907 Cases
247 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gay v. United States
No. 182. Sum Gay alias Sam Lee, Appellant, v. The United States. Appeal from the District Court of- the United States for the Northern District of California. Submitted by appellee January 25, 1907. Decided January 28, 1907. The Attorney Ge
Montana ex rel. Haire v. Rice
MONTANA ex rel. HAIRE v. RICE, STATE TREASURER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE'STATE OF MONTANA. No. 252. Argued January 7, 8, 1907. Decided January 28, 1907. Although a Federal right may not have been specially set up in the original pe
Merchants Heat & Light Co. v. J. B. Clow & Sons
MERCHANTS HEAT AND LIGHT COMPANY v. J. B. CLOW & SONS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 118. Argued January 15, 1907. Decided January 28, 1907. While a non-resident defendant corpora
Knudsen-Ferguson Fruit Co. v. Michigan Central Railroad
No. 550. Knudsen-Ferguson Fruit Company, Petitioner, v. Michigan Central Railroad Company. January 21, 1907. Mr. Roger S. Powell for petitioner. Mr. Cordenio A. Severance and Mr. Frank B. Kellogg for respondent.
Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
No. 533. No. 534. Empire State Cattle Company et al., Petitioners, v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company; and The Minnesota and Dakota Cattle Company, Petitioner, v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company. January
Armstrong v. Ashley
ARMSTRONG, RECEIVER, v. ASHLEY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF Columbia. No. 122. Argued December 7, 10, 1906. Decided. January 21, 1907. Where the title of one claiming ownership of real estate in bad faith is openly q
East Central Eureka Mining Co. v. Central Eureka Mining Co.
EAST CENTRAL EUREKA MINING COMPANY v. CENTRAL EUREKA MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 141. Argued January 8, 9, 1907. Decided January 21, 1907. The requirement of parallelism of the end lines of a m
Crowe v. Harmon
CROWE v. HARMON. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 70. Submitted October 31, 1906. Decided January 21, 1907. Decided on authority of Crowe v. Trickey, ante, p. 228. 71 Pac. Rep. 1125, affirmed. Mr. W. C. Keegin,
Crowe v. Trickey
CROWE v. TRICKEY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 71. Submitted October 31, 1906. Decided January 21, 1907. The statement of facts which the Supreme Court of a Territory is called on to make is in the nature o
In re Montana Mining Co.
No. 13. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of the Montana Mining Company, Limited, Petitioner. Argued November 6 and 7, 1906. Decided January 14, 1907. Mr. Charles J. Hughes, Jr., Mr. W. E. Cullen, Mr. Aléis B. Browne and Mr. Alexander Britt
Erie Railroad v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.
ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY v. ERIE AND WESTERN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 134. Argued December 14, 1906. Decided January 14, 1907. Admiralty courts, being, free .to work out th
Montana Mining Co. v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.
MONTANA MINING COMPANY, LIMITED, v. ST. LOUIS MINING AND MILLING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 402. Argued December 10, 11, 1906. Decided January 14, 1907. Where there is a question whether the ju
Northern Lumber Co. v. O'Brien
NORTHERN LUMBER COMPANY v. O’BRIEN. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. No. 121. Argued December 7, 1906. Decided January 14, 1907. The grant to the Northern Pacific Railroad Company by the act of July 2, 1864, 13 Stat.
Shropshire, Woodliff & Co. v. Bush
SHROPSHIRE, WOODLIFF & CO. v. BUSH. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 416. Submitted December 20, 1906. Decided January 7, 1907. An assignee of a claim of less than $300 for wages earned within three m
Wecker v. National Enameling & Stamping Co.
WECKER v. NATIONAL ENAMELING AND STAMPING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 133. Submitted December 14, 1906. Decided January 7, 1907. Where the Circuit Court refuses to. rema
Zartarian v. Billings
ZARTARIAN v. BILLINGS, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 120. Submitted December 7, 1906. Decided January 7, 1907. Naturalization acts of the United States
Ohio Valley National Bank v. Hulitt
OHIO VALLEY NATIONAL BANK v. HULITT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 108. Argued November 16, 1906. Decided January 7, 1907. While the mere pledgee of national bank stock cannot be held for double liability
New York ex rel. Hatch v. Reardon
NEW YORK, ex rel. HATCH, v. REARDON, PEACE OFFICER OF THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 310. Argued December 11, 12, 13, 1906. Decided January 7, 1907. The rule that the general expressions of
United States v. G. Falk & Brother
UNITED STATES v. G. FALK & BROTHER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 259. Argued December 4, 1906. Decided January 7, 1907. While the primary purpose of a proviso is to qualify only the provision of the
Cleveland Electric Railway Co v. Cleveland & the Forest City Railway Co.
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. CLEVELAND AND THE FOREST CITY RAILWAY COMPANY. CITY OF CLEVELAND v. CLEVELAND ELECTRIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Nos. 197, 3
American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Colorado ex rel. Lindsley
AMERICAN SMELTING AND REFINING COMPANY v. COLORADO ex rel. LINDSLEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATfD OP COLORADO. No. 143. Argued December 20, 21, 1906. Decided January 7, 1907. Although a State may impose different liabilities on
J. B. Orcutt Co. v. Green
J. B. ORCUTT COMPANY v. GREEN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 116. Argued December 6, 1906. Decided January 7, 1907. Presentation and delivery to the trustee, within a year after the adjudication, for
Newman v. Gates
NEWMAN v. GATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP INDIANA.. No. 137. Argued December 14, 17, 1906. Decided January 7, 1907. Where the highest court of the State does not pass on the merits of the case but dismisses the appeal beca
Elder v. Colorado ex rel. Badgley
ELDER v. COLORADO ex rel. BADGLEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP COLORADO. No. 132. Argued December 11, 1906. Decided January 7, 1907. A mere contest over a state office dependent for its solution exclusively upon the applicati
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.