Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1907 Cases
247 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hammond v. Whittredge
HAMMOND v. WHITTREDGE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 164. Argued January 17, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. Where the state court expressly decides, adversely to contention of plaintiff in error th
Eau Claire National Bank v. Jackman
EAU CLAIRE NATIONAL BANK v. JACKMAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 163. Argued January 16, 17, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. Where the bankrupt, within four months of the petition, mortgages his property to a
Arthur v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
ARTHUR v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 176. Argued January 24, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. Cau v. Texas & Pacific By. Co., 194 U. S. 427, followed as to binding ef
Clark v. Gerstley
CLARK v. GERSTLEY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 169. Argued January 17, 18, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. McGuire v. Gerstley, ante, p. 489, followed and held also: The liability of sureties on the bond
McGuire v. Gerstley
McGUIRE v. GERSTLEY ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 168. Argued January 17, 18, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. A bond to secure sales made on a credit for a specified period means that the purchasers shall n
Iglehart v. Iglehart
IGLEHART v. IGLEHART. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 158. Argued January 15, 16, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. In a general code such as that of the District of Columbia a later section . ' does not nul
Serra v. Mortiga
SERRA v. MORTIGA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 202. Submitted February 1, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. The guarantees extended by Congress to the Philippine Islands are to be interpreted as meaning what the
McKay v. Kalyton
McKAY v. KALYTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OREGON. No. 181. Argued January 25, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. Although the Federal right was first claimed in the state court in the petition for rehearing, if the question
American Railroad v. Castro
AMERICAN RAILROAD COMPANY OF PORTO RICO v. CASTRO. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF PORTO RICO. No. 151. Argued January 14, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. The mere assertion of a Federal right and its d
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cisco Oil Mill
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. CISCO OIL MILL. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIC APPEALS FOR THE SECOND SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 79. Submitted November 2, 1906. Decided February 25, 1907. Texas & Pacific Railway
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. ABILENE COTTON OIL COMPANY. ERROR TO, THE’ COURT 'OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE SECOND-‘-SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 78. Argued November 2, 1906. Decided February 25, 1907. Where defe
Wallace v. Adams
WALLACE v. ADAMS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OR APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 260. Argued December 21, 1906. Decided February 25, 1907. The power of Congress over citizenship in Indian tribes is plenary; it may adopt any reasonable me
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Texas
GULF, COLORADO AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. TEXAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 2. Argued October 11, 1906. Decided February 25, 1907. Where the facts are settled in the state court by special findings,- those fi
Union Bridge Co. v. United States
UNION BRIDGE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. ’ " No. 431. Argued December 5, 6, 1906. Decided February 25, 1907. Commerce comprehends navigation; and to-fre
Western Turf Ass'n v. Greenberg
WESTERN TURF ASSOCIATION v. GREENBERG. ERROR-TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 189. Submitted January 29, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. Where defendant corporation in the court below questions the constitutionality of
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States for the Benefit of Kenyon
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES FOR THE BENEFIT OF KENYON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF-.RHODE ISLAND. No. 173. Argued January 18, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. Under th
United States v. Hite
UNITED STATES v. HITE. APPEAL PROM . THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 276. Submitted December 18, 1906. Decided February 25, 1907. .Under the act of March 3,1889, 30’Stat. 1228, the two months' pay to which an officer of the Navy is entitled, who w
Kansas v. United States
KANSAS v. UNITED STATES. No. 11, Original. Submitted November 12, 1906. Decided February 25, 1907. Where the name of a State is'used simply for the prosecution of a private claim the original jurisdiction of this court cannot be maintained.
Crossman v. Bidwell
No. 52. George W. Crossman et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. George R. Bidwell. February 4, 1907. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Solicitor-General Hoyt in behalf of counsel for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. W. Wickham Smith for plainti
City of Chicago v. Mills
CITY OF CHICAGO v. MILLS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS- No. 286. Submitted December 21, 1906. Decided February 4, 1907. Although the certificate of the Circuit Court may. not state
Bown v. Walling
BOWN v. WALLING. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHOl No. 81. Argued January 10, 1907. Decided February 4, 1907. Decided on authority of Bacon v. Walker, ante, p: 311. 9 Idaho, 740, affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion
Bacon v. Walker
BACON v. WALKER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF- THE STATE OP IDAHO. No. 147. Argued January 10, 1907. Decided February 4, 1907. The police power of a State embraces regulations designed to promote the 'public convenience or the general pros
Walker v. McLoud
WALKER v. McLOUD. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT' COpRT OF APPEALS FOR THE'EIGHTH CIRCÚÍT. No. 140. Argued January 8, 1907. Decided February 4, 1907. The purchaser at a sale of property forfeited and sold under, a statute can only enforce his dema
McCallum v. Goldsborough
No. 551. Mary Sherman McCallum, Petitioner, v. Phillips L. Goldsborough, Collector, etc. January 28, 1907. Mr. J. Altheus Johnson and Mr. E. 0. Wagenhorst for petitioner. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.