Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1907 Cases
247 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States ex rel. West v. Hitchcock
UNITED STATES ex rel. WEST v. HITCHCOCK. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 194. Argued January 30, 1907. Decided March 4, 1907. While the promise of the United States to allot 160 acres to each member of the Wic
Wilmington Star Mining Co. v. Fulton
WILMINGTON STAR MINING COMPANY v. FULTON. ERR'OR' TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 139. Argued January 7, 1907. Decided March 4, 1907. It is an appropriate exercise of the police power of
Citizens' Savings & Trust Co. v. Illinois Central Railroad
CITIZENS' SAVINGS AND TRUST COMPANY, v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.. No. 238. Submitted January 7, 1907. Decided March 4, 1907. The repealing se
Halter v. Nebraska
HALTER v. NEBRASKA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT' OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 174. Submitted January 23, 1907. Decided March 4, 1907. A long established and steadily adhered to principle of constitutional construction precludes a judicial t
Kessler v. Treat
KESSLER v. TREAT, UNITED STATES MARSHAL. MORGAN v. SAME. CARPENTER v. SAME. WHITTLE v. SAME. WILCOX v. SAME. BRADEN v. SAME. ROYSTER v. SAME. SMITH v. SAME. BURROUGHS v. SAME. McDOWELL v. SAME. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED S
Tinsley v. Treat
TINSLEY v. TREAT, UNITED STATES MARSHAL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. . No. 369. Argued December 3, 4, 1906. Decided March 4, 1907. A district judge of the United States on- applic
Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.
SCHLEMMER v. BUFFALO, ROCHESTER AND PITTSBURG RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 41. Argued January 18, 21, 1907. Decided March 4, 1907. Statements of a witness although based on hearsay constitute
Smith v. Tennessee
No. 628. Ed. Smith, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Tennessee. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee. February 27, 1907. Docketed and dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Charles T. Cates, Jr., for the defendant in e
American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. De Castro
AMERICAN RAILROAD COMPANY OF PORTO RICO v. DE CASTRO. error to the district court of the united states for the DISTRICT OF PORTO RICO. No. 467. Argued January 14, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. Decided on the authority of American Railroa
Mathieson Alkali Works v. Mathieson
No. 566. Mathieson Alkali Works, Petitioner, v. T. T. Mathieson. February 25, 1907. Mr. Frank W. Christian for petitioner. Mr. Daniel Trigg, Mr. Robert L. Harrison and. Mr. William Byrd for respondent.
Hunter v. Johnson
No. 563. Charles W. Hunter et. al., Petitioners, v. Rebecca A. Johnson et al. February 25, 1907. Mr. L. P. Berry for petitioners.
Ornstine v. Cary
No. 200. Sigmond Ornstine, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. J. Cary. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin. Argued January 31, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. Mr. E. M. McVicker for plaintiff in error. Mr. A. C. Titus and Mr. L.
Coffey v. County of Harlan
COFFEY v. COUNTY OF HARLAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ' DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 177. Argued January 24, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. The power of the State to enact laws creating and defining crimes again
Cunningham v. Springer
CUNNINGHAM v. SPRINGER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW' MEXICO. No. 146. Argued January 10, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. The' excepting party should make it manifest that an error' prejudicial to • him has occurred i
Smithers v. Smith
SMITHERS v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 138. Submitted December 21, 1906. Decided February 25, 1907. When the Circuit Court dismisses a case under the. provisions of § 1 of
Duke v. Turner
DUKE, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF GUTHRIE, v. TURNER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 178. Argued January 24, 25, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. While the authorities are in conflict as to whether a statute of limita
Computing Scale Co. of America v. Automatic Scale Co.
COMPUTING SCALE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. AUTOMATIC SCALE COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 175. Argued January 25, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. While a combination of old elements producing a new an
Doyle v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.
DOYLE v. LONDON GUARANTEE AND ACCIDENT COMPANY, LIMITED. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 155. Argued January 11, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. An order punishing for contempt made in the progress
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Babcock
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY v. BABCOCK, TREASURER OF ADAMS COUNTY, NEBRASKA. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. FINK, TREASURER OF DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRIC
Allen v. United States
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 192. Argued January 29, 30, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. Under § 1986, Rev. Stat., a commissioner of the United States is not entitled to any fees for drawing complaints or ju
Mason City & Fort Dodge Railroad v. Boynton
MASON CITY AND FORT DODGE RAILROAD COMPANY v. BOYNTON. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 170. Argued January 22, 23, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. In condemnation proceedings the words plaintiff an
Osborne v. Clark
OSBORNE v. CLARK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 159. Argued January 16, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. The fact that a state statute which was assailed in the state court as invalid under the constitution of th
United States v. Keatley
UNITED STATES v. KEATLEY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 482. Submitted January 29, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. Where several persons are indicted under one indictment an order of the court granting separate trials makes separate
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Smith, Huggins & Co.
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. SMITH, HUGGINS & COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP TENNESSEE. No. 198. Argued January 31, 1907. Decided February 25, 1907. If a party relies upon a Federal right he must special
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.