Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1907 Cases
247 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
County of Presidio v. Noel-Young Bond & Stock Co.
No. 651. County of Presidio, Tex., Petitioner, v. The Noel-Young Bond and Stock Company. April 15, 1907. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granted. Mr. T. J. Beall for peti
In re Morales
No. 18, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Fernando Vazquez Morales et al.; Petitioners. Motion for leave to file submitted April 8, 1907. Decided April 15, 1907. Motion for leave to file petition for appeal granted, and appeal allowed on
Chanler v. Kelsey
CHANLER v. KELSEY, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SURROGATE’S COURT OF THE COUNTY' OP NEW YORK AND STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 240. Argued March 14, 1907. Decided April 15, 1907. Notwithstanding the common law rule that estat
Patterson v. Colorado ex rel. Attorney General
PATTERSON v. COLORADO Ex rel. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. No. 223. Argued March 5, 6, 1907. Decided April 15, 1907. The requirement in the Fourteenth Amendment of due p
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Williams
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY v. WILLIAMS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE < EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 243. Argued March 14, 15, 1907. Decided April 15, 1907. Under § 6 of the Circuit Court of Appeals Act of
Travers v. Reinhardt
TRAVERS v. REINHARDT. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS' OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 76. Argued November 1, 2, 1906. Decided April 15, 1907. While the predominant idea of , the testator’s mind when discovered is to be heeded as against
Burdick v. Dillon
No. 237. Bainbridge W. Burdick, Appellant, v. William Dillon et al. Appeal, from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. April 8, 1907. Dismissed, per stipulation'. Mr. Selden Bacon for appellant. Mr. H. V. Cunning
Mexican Central Railway Co. v. Eckman
No. 247. Mexican Central Railway Company, Limited, v. J. W. Eckman, Guardian, etc. On a certificate'from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Argued March 15 and 18, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. Mr. George E. Wa
Quinlan v. Green County
QUINLAN v. GREEN COUNTY, KENTUCKY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 213. Argued February 27, 28, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. Where a question certified by the Circuit Court of Appeals contains more t
Behn, Meyer & Co. v. Campbell
BEHN, MEYER & CO. v. CAMPBELL & GO TAUCO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 227. Argued March 7, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. In the absénce of modification by statute the rule in respect to all courts whose records
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. City of New Orleans
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP * LOUISIANA. No. 199. Argued January 31, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. Neither the fiction that personal property follows the
Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
PETERSON v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 225. Argued March 6, 7, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. Foreign corporations can be served wi
The Winnebago
THE WINNEBAGO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. Nos. 218, 219. Argued February 28, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. A state law will not be held unconstitutional in a suit coming from a state court at the instance of one who
Kawananakoa v. Polyblank
KAWANANAKOA v. POLYBLANK. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 273. Argued March 21, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. ■Under Equity Rule 92, where a part of the mortgage premises has been sold to the sovereign power whi
William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. Hutchins
WILLIAM W. BIERCE, LIMITED, A CORPORATION, v. HUTCHINS. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE' TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 212. Argued March 20, 21, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. In an appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii, tr
Hunt v. New York Cotton Exchange
HUNT v. NEW YORK COTTON EXCHANGE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP TENNESSEE. No. 314. Submitted March 4, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. Quotations of prices on an exchange, collected by the excha
Johnson v. Browne
JOHNSON v. BROWNE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 481. Argued March 4, 5, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. Although the surrender of a person demanded under an extradition treaty ha
Mercantile Trust Co. v. Hensey
MERCANTILE TRUST COMPANY v. HENSEY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 245. Submitted March 15, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. It is for the plaintiff in error to show affirmatively that error was committed, it is
Fields v. United States
FIELDS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR, TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 395. Argued March 12, 13, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. While under § 6 of the Court of Appeals Act of 1891, 26 Stat. 828, a certiorari can only be issu
Ballentyne v. Smith
BALLENTYNE v. SMITH. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 216. Argued March 21, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. .The old English rule that in chancery sales, until confirmation of the master’s report the bidding would
Gila Bend Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. Gila Water Co.
GILA BEND RESERVOIR AND IRRIGATION COMPANY v. GILA WATER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 226 of October term, 1905. Petition submitted October. 9, 1906. Decided April 8, 1907. Petition for rehearing i
Swing v. Weston Lumber Co.
SWING v. WESTON LUMBER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No 145. Argued January 10, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. The State has undoubted power to prohibit foreign insurance companies from doing business within it
Pearcy v. Stranahan
PEARCY v. STRANAHAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 1. Submitted March 4, 1907. Decided April 8, 1907. The averment that territory named in the complaint is a part of the United St
Ruef v. O'Neil
No. 661. Abraham Ruef, Plaintiff in Error, v. Thomas F. O’Neil, Sheriff, etc. In error to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, State of California. March 25, 1907. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. A. B. Broume f
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.