Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1910 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Fay v. Crozer
FAY v. CROZER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT O.P THE UNITED STATES FOR THE •SOUTHERN DISTRICT .OP WEST VIRGINIA'.' No. 165. Argued April 21, 22, 1910. Decided May 2, 1910. A writ of error based on constitutional question will not lie unless th
Citizens National Bank v. Commonwealth ex rel. Boyle County
CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF BOYLE COUNTY. ERROR TO THE .COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 135. Argued March 10, 1910. Decided May 2, 1910. An act assessing stockholders of natio
Grenada Lumber Co. v. Mississippi
GRENADA LUMBER COMPANY v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. E$ROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 493. Submitted January 1(), 1910. Decided May 2, 1910. ■ This court accepts the construction of the state court; and where that cour
Heike v. United States
HEIKE v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 849. Submitted April 11, 1910. Decided May 2, 1910. Appellate jurisdiction in the Federal system of procedure is purely statu
Standard Oil Co. v. Tennessee
STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF KENTUCKY v. STATE OF TENNESSEE. EREOR TO THE SUPREME• COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 160. Argued April 20, 1910. Decided May 2,1910. The Fourteenth Amendment will not be construed as introducing a factitious eq
Weems v. United States
WEEMS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 20. Argued November 30,-December 1,1909. Decided May 2, 1910. A paramount governmental authority may make use of subordinate governmental instruments, without
Lord & Hewlett v. United States
LORD & HEWLETT v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 162. Argued April 20, 1910. Decided May 2, 1910. An act of Congress appropriating for a competition for plans of a proposed building, the successful ones to be transmitte
Schultz v. Diehl
SCHULTZ v. DIEHL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 166. Submitted by appellants April 22, 1910. Decided April 25, 1910. Under the .act of March 3, 1875, c. 137, 18 Stat. 470, the Circuit Cou
Wenar v. Jones
WENAR v. JONES, BISHOP OF PORTO RICO. APPEAL'PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. No. 143. Submitted April 8, 1910. Decided April 25, 1910. In this case the decision appealed from, being merely an order to dismiss and not a determination o
United States v. Welch
UNITED STATES v. WELCH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 147, Argued April 11, 1910. Decided April 25, 1910. A private right of way is an easement and is land, and its destruction for
Stewart v. Griffith ex rel. Ball
STEWART v. GRIFFITH, EXECUTOR OF BALL, DECEASED. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 145. Argued April 8,11, 1910. Decided April 25, 1910. Where, as in this case, a condition of forfeiture in a contract of sale
Morales v. Ramos
No. 169. Fernando Vasquez Morales et al., Appellants, v. Juan Vicenty Ramos. April 19, 1910. Mr. Herbert E. Smith for the appellants. No appearance for Uhe appellee.
Illinois Central Railroad v. O'Neill
No. 866. Illinois Central Railroad Company, Petitioner, v. Mary O’Neill et al. April 18, 1910. Mr. Hunter C. Leake, Mr. Gustave Lemle, and Mr. Blewett Lee for the petitioner. No appearance for the respondents.
Nollman & Co. v. Wentworth Lunch Co.
NOLLMAN & CO. v. WENTWORTH LUNCH COMPANY. APPEAL FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 154. Argued April 15, 1910.- Decided April 18, 1910. On the authority of Toxaivay Hoteldpompany v
United States v. Carter
UNITED STATES v. OBERLIN M. CARTER. OBERLIM M. CARTER v. UNITED STATES. EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE UNITED STATES, PETITIONER. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION. Nos. 551,
Wilcoxon v. Wilcoxon
No. 152. Thomas D. Wilcoxon, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mitchell H. Wilcoxon. Martha E. Lemon and Mary D. Proctor. April 11, 1910. Mr. H. T. Wilcoxon for the plaintiff in error. Mr. J. A. Crain for the defendants in error.
Harrison v. Philadelphia Contributionship
No. 841. S. Graeme Harrison, Petitioner, v. The Philadelphia Contributionship for the Insurance of Houses from Loss by Fire. April 11, 1910. Mr. R. Mason Lisle for the petitioner. No appearance for the respondent.
German Alliance Insurance v. Home Water Supply Co.
No. 843. German Alliance Insurance Company, Petitioner, v. Home Water Supply Company. April 11, 1910. Mr. Hartwell Cabell for the petitioner. No appearance for the respondent.
Ex parte W. G. Coyle & Co.
EX PARTE W. G. COYLE & CO., PETITIONERS. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. —, Original. Submitted April 4, 1910. Decided April 11, 1910. Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of mandamus to a Circuit Judge
Rogers v. Clark Iron Co.
ROGERS v. CLARK IRON COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 244. Motion to dismiss submitted April 4, 1910. Decided April 11, 1910. Where the state-court only decides who is entitled to lands under a patent no Fe
Brantley v. Georgia
BRANTLEY v. STATE OF GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OTP TOP, STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 692. Argued April 6, 1910. Decided April 11, 1910. Where one has been tried in a state court for murder and convicted of manslaughter, and, on his own m
McClellan v. Carland
McCLELLAN v. CARLAND, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 630. Argued January 25, 26, 1910. Decided April 11, 1910. The power of this court to
Lutcher & Moore Lumber Co. v. Knight
LUTCHER & MOORE LUMBER COMPANY v. KNIGHT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 101. Argued January 24, 1910. Decided April 11, 1910. Á party who as defendant in an equity case has successfully asserted that
St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad v. Wabash Railroad
ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD COMPANY v. WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY AND CITY OF ST. LOUIS. SAME v. SAME. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.