Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1912 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Jackson Vinegar Co.
YAZOO AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILROAD CO. v. JACKSON VINEGAR CO. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 57. Submitted November 13, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. The statute of Mississippi imposing a penalty
Buck Stove & Range Co. v. Vickers
BUCK STOVE AND RANGE CO. v. VICKERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 10. Argued December 19, 1911. Decided December 2, 1912. Rev. Stat., § 1011; providing that there shall be no reversal in this court upon a writ of e
Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. Lynch
PURITY EXTRACT AND TONIC COMPANY v. LYNCH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 464. Submitted October 28, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. The decision by the state court that an article is within the prohibition of;
Toyota v. Territory of Hawaii
TOYOTA v. TERRITORY OF HAWAII. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 49. Submitted November 13, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. Section 1343, Revised' Laws of Hawaii, imposing a license fee of six hundred dollars for au
Four Hundred & Forty-Three Cans of Frozen Egg Product v. United States
FOUR HUNDRED AND FORTY-THREE CANS OF FROZEN EGG PRODUCT v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM AND IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 590. Argued October 24, 25, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. The provision in § 10
Miller v. Guasti
MILLER v. GUASTI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 478. Submitted October 15, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. A debt of the bankrupt not properly scheduled as required by § 7 of the Bankruptcy Act is not barred by th
Southwestern Brewery & Ice Co. v. Schmidt
SOUTHWESTERN BREWERY AND ICE COMPANY v. SCHMIDT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 55. Argued November 14, 15, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. A master may remain liable for a certain time for a failure to use r
Central Lumber Co. v. South Dakota
CENTRAL LUMBER COMPANY v. STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 51. Argued November 13, 14, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. Regulating discriminatory sales made within the State for the purpose
Jones v. Springer
JONES, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF ORO DREDGING COMPANY, v. SPRINGER. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 23. Argued October 30, November 4, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. A bona fide purchaser for value of peris
Burnet v. Desmornes y Alvarez
BURNET v. DESMORNES Y ALVAREZ. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. No. 11. Submitted October 30, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. Whether prescription goes only to the remedy or extinguishes the right, it affects the jurisdiction no
Eubank v. City of Richmond
EUBANK v. CITY OF RICHMOND. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 48. Argued November 12, 13, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. While the police power of the State extends not only to regulations promoting public
Taylor v. Columbian University
TAYLOR v. COLUMBIAN UNIVERSITY (NOW KNOWN IN LAW AS GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY). APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 41. Argued November 6, 1912, Decided December 2, 1912. A’devise and' bequest, to’a universi
Selover, Bates & Co. v. Walsh
SELOVER, BATES AND COMPANY v. WALSH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 22. Submitted October 29, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. With the ruling of the state court as to the. applicability of a state statute to a par
First National Bank of Princeton v. Littlefield
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PRINCETON, ILLINOIS v. LITTLEFIELD, TRUSTEE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 572. Submitted November 4, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. The settled rule is that the concurrent acti
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
DEMING v. CARLISLE PACKING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 511. Submitted November 4, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. Even though the record may present in form a Federal question the writ of error will b
Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission
LOUISIANA NAVIGATION COMPANY, LIMITED, v. OYSTER COMMISSION OF LOUISIANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 40. Argued November 6, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. This court cannot be called upon to review the action
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad
UNITED STATES v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH. No. 446. Argued April 19, 22, 23, 1912. Decided December 2, 1912. The purchase by the Union Pacific Railroad Compa
Clinger v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
No. 236. Eliza B. Clinger, Administratrix, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company of Kentucky et al. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. Motion to dismiss submitted November 11, 1912. Decided N
Smith v. Hitchcock
SMITH AND OTHERS, TRADING UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF STREET & SMITH, APPELLANTS, v. HITCHCOCK, POSTMASTER-GENERAL. FRANK TOUSEY, PUBLISHER, A CORPORATION, v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 31, 32. Argu
Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. United States
STANDARD SANITARY MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. No. 554. Argued October 15, 16, 17, 1912. Decided November 18, 1912. A trade agreement un
Morse v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.
No. 747. A. W. Morse, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Company. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas. November 13, 1912. Mr. William H. Atwell for the plainti
Chicago & Erie R. R. v. Ebersole
No. 37. The Chicago & Erie R. R. Co., Plaintiff in Error, v. Joseph A. Ebersole. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. Argued for the plaintiff in error November 7, 1912. Decided November 11, 1912. Mr. D. C. Harrington for
United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad
UNITED STATES, CINCINNATI AND COLUMBUS TRACTION COMPANY, AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY AND THE NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. No. 6
Harty v. Municipality of Victoria
MONSIGNOR HARTY v. MUNICIPALITY OF VICTORIA. APPEAL FROM AND ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 13. Argued October 30, 1912. Decided November 11, 1912. A suit to recover real estate, like an ordinary action at law, ca
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.