Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1912 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R. v. River & Harbor Transportation Co.
No. 835. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R. Co., Owner, etc., Petitioner, v. River & Harbor Transportation Co. November 4, 1912. Mr. Edward D. Robbins for. the petitioner. Mr. Charles C. Burlingham for the respondent.
Detroit Steel Cooperage Co. v. Sistersville Brewing Co.
No. 825. Detroit Steel Cooperage Co., Petitioner, v. Sistersville Brewing Co. et al. November 4, 1912. Mr. George M. Hoffheimer, Mr. O. B, Taylor and Mr. Charles M. Kimball for the petitioner. No appearance for the respondent.
Ex parte Cook
No. -. Original. Ex parte In the Matter of Walter Cook, Petitioner. Submitted October 28, 1912. Decided November 4, 1912. Mr. Milton Strasburger for the petitioner. No one opposing.
Loeb v. Georgia
No. 21. Samuel Loeb, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Georgia. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia. October 30, 1912. No appearance for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Thos. S. Felder for the defendant in error.
Kansas City v. Kansas ex rel. Taggart
No. 396. Kansas City, Missouri, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Kansas ex rel. Joseph Taggart, County Attorney, et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Motion to dismiss or affirm or place on the summary docket subm
Breese v. United States
BREESE AND DICKERSON v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 476. Argued October 15, 1912. Decided October 28, 1912. An indictment duly'found by the Federal grand jury, while in session in
United States v. Marshall
No. 805. The United States, Petitioner, v. A. Gero Marshall. October 21, 1912. The Attorney General, The Solicitor General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Harr for the petitioner. Mr. John M. Coleman for the respondent.
Central R. R. v. Colasurdo
No. 569. The Central R. R. Co. of New Jersey, Plaintiff in Error, v. Michael Colasurdo. In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. October 14, 1912. Mr. Robert Thorne for the plaintiff in error. No appear
Fidelity Trust Co. v. Gaskell
No. 228. Fidelity Trust Co., Appellant, v. Lon H. Gaskell, Receiver. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. October 14, 1912. Mr. Frank Hagerman and Mr. Justin D. Bowersock for the appellan
Northern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. v. Mayor of Hammond
No. 26. Northern Indiana Gas & Electric Co., Appellant, v. The Mayor and Board of Public Works of the City of Hammond, Ind., et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana. October 14, 1912. Mr. Max Pa
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Gilkinson
No. 96. Western Union Telegraph Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Nancy E. Gilkinson. In error to the Appellate Court of the State of Indiana. July 31, 1912. Mr. Samuel O. Pickens, Mr. Robert Franklin Davidson, Mr. George H. Fearons, Mr. Rush
Archer v. Greenville Sand & Gravel Co.
No. 1170. Kate C. Archer, Petitioner, v. The Greenville Sand & Gravel Company. June 10, 1912. Mr. T. M. Miller, for the petitioner. No appearance for
Wells v. United States
No. 1011. No. 1012. No. 1013. and No. 1014. Frank T. Wells, Petitioner, v. The United States; Rufus J. Ireland, Petitioner, v. The United States; Wilberforce Sully, Petitioner, v. The United States; George W. Dally, Petitioner, v. The Unite
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Gawinske
No. 1162. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company, Petitioner, v. Harry A. Gawinske. June 10, 1912. Mr. JohnW. Yefkes, Mr. George E. Hamilton andMr.Hugh L. Bond, Jr., for the petitioner. No appearance for the respondent.
Central Park, North & East River Railroad v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
No. 1146. Central Park, North & East River Railroad Company, Petitioner, v. The Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company, Trustee, et al. June 10, 1912. Mr. William N. Dykman and Mr. Arthur E. Goddard for the petitioner. Mr. Frederick Geller and Mr. B
Ex parte Webb
EX PARTE CHARLEY WEBB, PETITIONER. ON APPLICATION FOE HABEAS CORPUS AND CERTIORARI. No. 11. Original. Argued May 13, 1912. Decided June 10, 1912. The Oklahoma Enabling- Act of June 16, 1906, 34 Stat. 267, c. 3335, followed by the adoption o
Flannelly v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
FLANNELLY v. DELAWARE AND HUDSON CO. CERTIORARI TO-THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 132. Argued December 19, 20,1911. Decided June 10, 1912. The law requires of one going upon or over a railroad crossing the exercise
Kindred v. Union Pacific Railroad
KINDRED v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 51. Argued November 9, 1911. Decided June 10, 1912. Under § 2 of the act of July 1, 1862, 12 Stat. 489, c. 120,-land other . pro
Clairmont v. United States
CLAIRMONT v. UNITED STATES. . ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR' THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA. No. 239. Submitted May 1, 1912. Decided June 10, 1912. The act of January 30, .1897, 29 Stat. 506, c'.-109, in regard to sale of-li
Standard Stock Food Co. v. Wright
STANDARD STOCK FOOD COMPANY v. WRIGHT, STATE FOOD AND DAIRY COMMISSIONER OF IOWA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 222. Argued April 24, 1912. Decided June 10, 1912. Savage v. Jones,
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Duvall
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. DUVALL. ERROR TO TRÍE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH ' CAROLINA. No. 304. Argued April 30, 1912. Decided June 10, 1912. To give this court jurisdiction under § 709, Rev. Stat., it must appear upon the recor
Brown v. Elliott
BROWN v. ELLIOTT, UNITED STATES MARSHAL IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, et al. MOORE v. ELLIOTT, UNITED STATES MARSHAL IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR T
Hyde v. United States
HYDE AND SCHNEIDER v. UNITED STATES. ON WRIT OP CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 447. Argued October 23, 24,1911. Reargued May 3,1912. Decided June 10, 1912. In this ease the defendant applied for a writ o
United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
UNITED STATES, INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, AND FEDERAL SUGAR REFINING COMPANY v. THE BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. No. 722. Argued January 15, 16, 1912. Decided June 10, 1912. The Com
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.