Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1912 Cases
280 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Johnson v. Washington Loan & Trust Co.
JOHNSON v. WASHINGTON LOAN & TRUST COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 40. Argued December 8, 1911. Decided April 1, 1912. A will contained the following provision: “It is my will and desire that my sa
Haskell v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.
HASKELL v. KANSAS NATURAL GAS COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 914. Submitted February 23, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. Natural gas after severance from the soil being a c
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Goodrich Transit Co.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. GOODRICH TRANSIT COMPANY. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. SAME. UNITED STATES v. WHITE STAR LINE. UNITED STATES v. SAME. APPEALS PROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. Nos. 879, 880, 881, 882. Argued Febr
Brown v. Selfridge
BROWN v. SELFRIDGE. ERROR to the court of appeals of the district of COLUMBIA. No. 214. Argued March 14, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. While in an action for malicious prosecution the burden of proving malice and want of probable cause is'on
In re Loving
MATTER OF THE PETITION OF LOVING, TRUSTEE. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 216. Submitted March 15, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. Controversies arising in bankruptcy proceedings, as distinguished from
Swanson v. Sears
SWANSON v. SEARS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. No. 217. Argued March 15, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. A location and discovery on land withdrawn quoad hoc from the public domain by a valid and subsisting mining claim is
World's Fair Mining Co. v. Powers
WORLD’S FAIR MINING COMPANY v. POWERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 207. Argued March 11, 12, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. The owner of a mine contracted with a purchaser for the latter to go into possession a
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. City of Richmond
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. CITY OF RICHMOND. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 195. Argued March 6, 7, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. A municipal ordinance will not be held un
Guarantee Title & Trust Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.
GUARANTEE TITLE & TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE OF PITTSBURGH INDUSTRIAL IRON WORKS, BANKRUPT, v. TITLE GUARANTY & SURETY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 188. Argued March 5, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912
Consumers' Co. v. Hatch
CONSUMERS’ COMPANY, LIMITED, v. HATCH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. No. 184. Argued March 4,1912. Decided April 1, 1912. When prior to the granting of a charter to a public service corporation it has been clearly settle
J. W. Calnan Co. v. Doherty
J. W. CALNAN COMPANY v. DOHERTY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 212. Argued March 14,1912. Decided April 1, 1912. A ruling of the Circuit Court of Appeals that the petitioning creditors held provable cla
Plummer v. United States
PLUMMER v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 177. Argued February 29, March 1, 1912. — Decided April 1, 1912. Under § 13 of the Navy Personnel Act of March 3,1899, 30 Stat. 1007, c. 413, and the acts of June 7, 1900, 31 St
Wood v. United States
WOOD v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 71. Argued November 16, 17, 1911. Decided April 1, 1912. An officer of the Navy serving as aid to the Admiral under the provisions of the acts of March 2 and 3, 1899, ce. 378 and 4
Gonzales v. Buist
GONZALES v. BUIST. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 181. Submitted March 4, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. Appellant’s contention that he was not accorded a proper hearing in the.court below cannot be av
Schodde v. Twin Falls Land & Water Co.
SCHODDE, EXECUTRIX OF SCHODDE, v. TWIN FALLS LAND AND WATER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 2. Argued March 7, 8, 1911. Decided April 1, 1912. Under the laws of Idaho relating to appropriation
Ripley v. United States
RIPLEY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. RIPLEY. Nos. 498, 499. Motion to modify judgment, submitted March 18, 1912. Decided April 1, 1912. Mr. William, H. Robeson, Mr. Benjamin Carter and Mr. F. Carter Pope for Ripley. Mr. Assistant Attor
Kyle v. Hammond
KYLE v. HAMMOND. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT- OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 972. Submitted March 11, 1912. Decided March 18, 1912. Under thp saving clause of the act of June 7, 1878, 20 Stat. 99, c. 160, ■ the review of the order
Campbell v. United States
CAMPBELL v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 161. Argued March 6,1912. Decided March 18, 1912. As §§ 566, 649 and 700, Rev. Stat., do not make any provisions for such • a case, the trial of a
San Juan Light & Transit Co. v. Requena
SAN JUAN LIGHT & TRANSIT CO. v. REQUENA. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR PORTO RICO. No. 96. Argued December 13, 1911. Decided March 18, 1912. Denial by the trial court of a motion to strike from the complaint allegatio
Beutler v. Grand Trunk Junction Railway Co.
BEUTLER v. GRAND TRUNK JUNCTION RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 194. Submitted March 6, 1912. Decided March 18, 1912. Courts may not abolish an established rule of law upon persona
Thomas v. Taylor
THOMAS v. TAYLOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 171. Argued February 28, 1912. Decided March 18, 1912. . How an action brought in the state court shall be denominated is for the state court to determine. Although
Roselle v. Virginia
No. 185. Benjamin F. Roselle, Plaintiff in Error, v. The Commonwealth of Virginia. In error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia. Argued March 4, 1912. Decided March 18, 1912. Mr. Daniel Harmon, Mr. Homan W. Walsh and Mr
Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.
HENRY v. A. B. DICK COMPANY. ON A CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 20. Argued October 27, 1911. Decided March 11, 1912. Complainant sold his patented machine embodying the invention claimed and descr
Ripley v. United States
RIPLEY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. RIPLEY. APPEALS PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. Nos. 498, 499. Submitted December 22, 1911. Decided March 11, 1912. Where the power of the Government over the contract is complete and its agent’s decision
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.