Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. City of South Bend
GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CITY OF SOUTH BEND. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 81. Argued December 10, 11, 1912. Decided February 24, 1913. What the'contract alleged to be impaired by subsequent legislati
Matheson v. United States
MATHESON v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE FOURTH DIVISION OF THE TERRITORY OF ALASKA. No. 148. Submitted January 24, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Where the jurisdiction is coextensive with the d
Ross v. Stewart
ROSS v. STEWART. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 140. Submitted January 23, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Congress has power to invest a townsite commission with power to determine contests between, rival claiman
Svor v. Morris
SVOR v. MORRIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 756. Submitted January 6, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. One who settled on land not at the time open to entry but which became ■ open does not have to go through t
Smoot v. Heyl
SMOOT v. HEYL. APPEAL PROM THE COURT' OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 85. Argued December 13, 16, 1912. Decided February 24, 1913. Under § 233 of the Code of the District of Columbia this court has jurisdiction of an appeal from
Bacon v. Illinois
BACON, DOING BUSINESS AS WABASH ELEVATOR, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 76. Argued December 6, 1912. Decided February 24, 1913. The denial to the States of the power to tax arti
Supreme Ruling of the Fraternal Mystic Circle v. Snyder
SUPREME RULING OF THE FRATERNAL MYSTIC CIRCLE v. SNYDER. ERROR TO' THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 34. Submitted December 16, 1912. Decided February 24, 1913. The Stale'is entitled at all times to prevent the perversion of
United States v. Mason
UNITED STATES v. MASON, EXECUTOR. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS.' No. 537. Submitted December 20, 1912. Decided February 24, 1913. Section 5 of the act of April 16, 1908, 35 Stat. 61, c. 345, providing for rank and pay of retired officers
Bradley v. City of Richmond
BRADLEY v. CITY OF RICHMOND. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE .STATE OF. VIRGINIA. No. 38. Submitted November 6, 1912. Decided February 24, 1913. 1913. A privilege tax -may perform the double function of regulating the business.
Wells, Fargo & Co. v. Neiman-Marcus Co.
WELLS, FARGO & COMPANY v. NEIMAN-MARCUS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH . SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 29. Argued November 5, 1912. Decided February 24, 1913. Whether void or not under the
Hampton v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
HAMPTON v. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN AND SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 3. Argued October 29, 30, 1912. Decided February 24, 1913. A provision in a state
United States ex rel. Foreman v. Meyer
UNITED STATES EX REL. FOREMAN v. MEYER, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY. PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Submitted January 27, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Champion Lumber Co. v. Fisher, ante, p. 44
United States ex rel. Champion Lumber Co. v. Fisher
UNITED STATES EX REL. CHAMPION LUMBER COMPANY v. FISHER, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Submitted January 27, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Under subd. 5 of § 25
Troxell v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
TROXELL, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD' CIRCUIT. No. 854. Argued January 14, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Where the second suit is upon the same c
Bartell v. United States
BARTELL v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT' OF SOUTH DAKOTA. . No. 691. Argued January 14, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. An indictment to be good under the Constitution and laws of the Uni
Lovell v. Newman
LOVELL, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF KNIGHT, v. NEWMAN & SON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 593. Submitted January 13, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Where the jurisdiction of the Federal court of a suit bro
James v. Stone & Co.
JAMES, A BANKRUPT, v. STONE & COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 142. Submitted January 23, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Under the Bankruptcy Act the only appeal from a judgment granting or ref
Rogers v. Arkansas
ROGERS v. STATE OF ARKANSAS. BARNHILL v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF -THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. Nos. 576, 577. Argued January 21, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Crenshaw v. Arkansas, ante, p. 389, followed to effect that the license
Crenshaw v. Arkansas
CRENSHAW v. STATE OF ARKANSAS. GANNAWAY v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE ARKANSAS. Nos. 127, 128. Argued January 20, 21, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. The negotiation of sales of goods which are in another State, for'
Porto Rico v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.
PEOPLE OF PORTO RICO v. TITLE GUARANTY AND SURETY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 154. Argued January 30, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. In this case held that a bond given in pursuance of an ordi
Luke v. Smith
LUKE v. SMITH. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP ARIZONA. No. 150. Argued January 27, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. The Supreme Court of the Territory of Arizona having, in construing the recording statute, followed the d
Cordova v. Folgueras y Rijos
CORDOVA v. FOLGUERAS Y RIJOS. DUMEY v. HERNANDEZ Y BELLO. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. Nos. 141, 160. Argued January 23, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Du
Wadkins v. Producers Oil Co.
WADKINS v. PRODUCERS OIL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OR THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 638. Argued January 31, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Whore defendant’s claim to land formerly part of the public domain is based on his grantor’
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United States
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 500. Argued January 8, 9, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. While punctuation is a fallible standard of the meaning of a s
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.