Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
McLaughlin Bros. v. Hallowell
McLAUGHLIN BROTHERS v. HALLOWELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP IOWA. No. 149. Argued January 27, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. Au order of the United States Circuit Court remanding the cause to the state court is not reviewable
Donnelly v. United States
DONNELLY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 97. Argued December 18, 1912. Decided April 7, 1913. From an early period Congress has accorded to the Executive a large
Sweeney v. Erving
SWEENEY v. ERVING. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP. COLUMBIA. No. 60. Argued February 28, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. Where the rule of res vpsa loquitur applies, it does not have the. effect of shifting the burden of proo
Pico v. United States
PICO v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO .THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 319. Argued February 25, 26, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. Under art. 403, Philippine Penal Code, a person can be guilty of murder with alevosía (treachery) al
Wilson v. Snow
WILSON v. SNOW. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 187. Argued March 13, 14, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. The rule that an ancient deed to property in continuous possession of the person producing it proves itsel
Lyle v. Patterson
LYLE v. PATTERSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 167. Argued March 5, 1913 Decided April 7, 1913. Quaere, whether the benefits of the act of March 3,1887, providing for settlement of titles of purchase
Hebert v. Crawford
HEBERT v. CRAWFORD, TRUSTEE, AND LEBLANC. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 83. Submitted December 9, 1912. Decided April 7, 1913. Whatever may be the legal rights of one claiming legal or equitable title t
George A. Fuller Co. v. McCloskey
GEORGE A. FULLER COMPANY v. McCLOSKEY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP. APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 176. Submitted March 7, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. The averments in the declaration when taken together, held sufficient to allow proof
Santa Fe, Prescott & Phœnix Railway Co. v. Grant Bros. Construction Co.
SANTA FE, PRESCOTT & PHŒNIX RAILWAY COMPANY v. GRANT BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. ERROR TO THE S.UPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 147. Argued January 24, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. A rule of law restricting thS right of con
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. McGinnis
GULF, COLORADO AND SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. v. McGINNIS. error to the court of civil appeals for the third ^ SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 762. Argued January 7, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. The Employers’ Liability Act o
Houghton v. Burden
HOUGHTON, RECEIVER, v. BURDEN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 591. Argued January 7, 1913. Decided April, 7, 1913. Where a secured creditor voluntarily comes into the Bankruptcy Court and asserts a clai
United States v. Reading Co.
UNITED STATES v. READING COMPANY. TEMPLE IRON COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. READING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 198, 206, 217. Motions to modify de
Ettor v. City of Tacoma
ETTOR v. CITY OF TACOMA. HOWARD v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP. WASHINGTON. Nos. 68, 69. Argued December 6, 1912. Decided April 7, 1913. In the absence of legislation requiring compensation to be made for damages to abu
Bogart v. Southern Pacific Co.
BOGART, AS EXECUTOR OF LAWRENCE, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 165. Argued March 5, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. The question intended to be brought
McDermott v. Wisconsin
McDermott v. STATE OF WISCONSIN. GRADY v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. Nos. 112, 113. Argued January 17, 20, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. State legislation in regard to labeling articles in interstate commerce
Frosch v. Walter
FROSCH v. WALTER. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 192. Argued March 17, 18, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. A declaration in a deed of trust which clearly shows that the' sole object of the instrument is to pr
United States v. Pacific & Arctic Railway & Navigation Co.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PACIFIC AND ARCTIC RAILWAY AND NAVIGATION COMPANY, PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY, ALASKA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT CQURT OF THE UNITED STATESv FOR ALASKA, DIVIS
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Kyle
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY v. KYLE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 194. Argued March 18, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. Nebraska Live Stock Speed Law sustained on authority of Chicago, Burlington
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Cram
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY v. CRAM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE • OP NEBRASKA. No. 193. Argued March 18, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. The legislature of a State, when so authorized, by its constitution, has
Metropolis Theatre Co. v. City of Chicago
METROPOLIS THEATRE COMPANY v. CITY OF CHICAGO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 181. Argued March 12, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. A classification of theatres for license fees based on, and graded according to, pric
United States v. Anderson
UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 705. Argued February 26, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. The prohibition, in the Indian Appropriation Act of 1884, against sale of catt
Plested v. Abbey
PLESTED v. ABBEY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP COLORADO. No. 156. Argued January 31, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. Subordinate officers of the'Land Department 'are under the control, and their acts a
Friend v. Talcott
FRIEND v. TALCOTT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 155. Argued January 30, 31, 1913. Decided April 7, 1913. Under the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, as amended in 1903, a creditor is not bound to' elect whic
Kharas v. United States
No. 838. Theodore Kharas, Petitioner, v. The United States. March 24, 1913. Mr. T. J. Mahoney for the petitioner.- The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Harr for the respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.