Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.
THE FAIR v. KOHLER DIE AND SPECIALTY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 169. Argued March 6, 1913. Decided March 24, 1913. Where plaintiff relies upon infringement of his p
United States v. George
UNITED STATES v. GEORGE. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP NEBRASKA. No. 442. Argued February 26, 1913. Decided March 24, 1913. Quaere: whether the Criminal Appeals Act of March 2, 1907, does not require a
City of Chicago v. Munroe
No. 726. The City of Chicago, Petitioner, v. William Munroe et al., Executors, etc., et al. March 17, 1913. Mr. John W. Beckwith and Mr. Charles M. Haft for the petitioner. No appearance for the respondents.
Brown v. Washington
No. 189. Edwin J. Brown, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Washington. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington. Argued by the plaintiff in error, and -submitted for the defendant in error March 14, 1913. Decided March 17,
Journal of Commerce & Commercial Bulletin v. Burleson
JOURNAL OF COMMERCE AND COMMERCIAL BULLETIN v. BURLESON, AS POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 818. Submitted March 11, 1913. Decided March
United States ex rel. Knight v. Lane
UNITED STATES EX REL. KNIGHT v. LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. IN ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA,. No. 163. Argued March 5, 6, 1913. Decided March 17, 1913. Until, the legal title to public land passes from the
Abilene National Bank v. Dolley
ABILENE NATIONAL BANK v. DOLLEY, BANK COMMISSIONER OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. APPEAL FROM. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ■ DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 175. Submitted March 5, 1913. Decided March 17, 1913. The Kansas Bank Depositor
Lang v. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf Railroad
No. 962. Theresa L. Lang et al., Petitioners, v. The Choctaw, Olkahoma & Gulf Railroad Company et al. March 10, 1913. Mr. Wm. M. Randolph and Mr. Wassell Randolph for the petitioners. Mr. Thos. S. Busbee for the respondents.
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Harriman
MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. HARRIMAN. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 121. Argued January 20, 1913. Decided March 10, 1913. Adams Express Co. v. Croninqe
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Carl
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CARL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 16. Argued October 22, 1912. Decided March 10, 1913. Under the Carmack Amendment an interstate carrier comes under liability not only for
Baxter v. Buchholz-Hill Transportation Co.
BAXTER v. BUCHHOLZ-HILL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 882. Submitted February 24, 1913. Decided March 10, 1913. The decree in a case is the dominant act and cannot be given a greater effect
Marrone v. Washington Jockey Club
MARRONE v. WASHINGTON JOCKEY CLUB. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT Oi-COLUMBU. No. 59. Argued February 28, 1913 Decided March 10, 1913. The rule commonly accepted in this country man the English cases is that a ticket to a pla
Maisen v. Weis
No. 224. Riwke Maisen, Alias Riwke Maisch, Appellant, v. Louis T. Weis, United States Commissioner of Immigration, etc., et al. March 6, 1913. Mr. Eugene O’Dunne and Mr. Thos. J. Mason for the appellant. The Attorney General for the appelle
Velati v. Dante
No. 956. Mary A. Velati, Petitioner, v. William. J. Dante, Trustee. March 3, 1913. Mr. Wilton J. Lambert for the petitioner. Mr. Edwin C.'Brandenburg, Mr. Clarence A. Brandenburg and Mr. F. Walter Brandenburg for the respondent.
Umeno Shigematsu v. H. Hackfeld & Co.
No. 166. Umeno Shigematsu, Appellant, v. H. Hackfeld & Company, Limited. February 27, 1913. Mr. John W. Cathcart for the appellant. Mr. Frank E. Thompson and Mr. Charles F. Clemons for the appellee.
Redmond v. Alexander
No. 164. Henry S. Redmond et al., Appellants, v. Paul Alexander, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Bornn & Company. February 24, 1913. Mr. Herbert A. Heyn, Mr..C. E. Thorn and Mr. Chas. K. Beekman for the. appellants. Mr. Frederick C. McLaughlin
Malleable Iron Range Co. v. Beckwith
No. 947. Malleable Iron Range Company, Petitioner, v. Arthur K. Beckwith. Mr'. Thos. A. Banning and Mr Arthur L. Morsell for the petitioner.. Mr.- Fred L. Chappell for the respondent. February 24, 1913.
Zavelo v. Reeves
ZAVELO v. REEVES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. No. 299. Argued January 7, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. In the absence of' any proof to that effect in the record, a promise by the bankrupt made between the petition
Starr v. Long Jim
STARR v. LONG JIM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 151. Argued January 28, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. An agreement as to division and allotment of lands between the Secretary of the Interior and chiefs repre
Southern Pacific Co. v. Schuyler
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. SCHUYLER. ERROR TO THE. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH. No. 143. Argued January 23, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Whether the anti-pass provision of the Hepburn^ Act prohibits a carrier from giving free in
Ensign v. Pennsylvania
WILLIAM A. ENSIGN v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. CHARLES A. ENSIGN v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 123, 124. Argued January 20, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. The Fifth Amendment is not obligatory
Rosaly v. Graham y Frazer
ROSALY, WIDOW OF RABAINNE, v. GRAHAM Y FRAZER. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OP PORTO RICO. No. 64. Submitted December 5, 1912. Decided February 24, 1913. The jurisdiction of this court, on appeals from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico is co
Van Iderstine v. National Discount Co.
VAN IDERSTINE, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF FELLERMAN, v. NATIONAL DISCOUNT COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIBCUIT COUBT OP APPEALS FOB THE SECOND CIBCUIT. No. 136. Argued January 22, 23, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. A general verdict in an equit
Southern Pacific Co. v. City of Portland
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. CITY OF PORTLAND. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 122. Argued January 6, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. Where, as in this case, a municipal ordinance, granting
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.