Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Amoskeag Savings Bank v. Purdy
AMOSKEAG SAVINGS BANK v. PURDY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 6. Argued December 4, 5, 1912. Decided December 1, 1913. Tbe provisions in tbe tax law of New York, chap. 62, Laws of 1909, imposing a flat rate on sha
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. United States
DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 275. Argued October 17, 1913 Decided December 1, 1913. Tbe commodity clause of th
United States v. Twenty-Five Packages
UNITED STATES v. TWENTY-FIVE PACKAGES OF PANAMA HATS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 257. Argued October 30, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. The expression — to attempt to introduce into the commerce
Downman v. Texas
DOWNMAN v. STATE OF TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OP CIVIL APPEALS POR THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OP TEXAS. No. 43. Submitted November 3, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. While real estate is generally taxed as a unit, sepa
Street & Smith v. Atlas Manufacturing Co.
STREET & SMITH, A COPARTNERSHIP, v. ATLAS MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT., No 618. Submitted November 10, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. Judgments and decrees of the Circuit Courts of
Monson v. Simonson
MONSON v. SIMONSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 14. Submitted October 30, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. Restrictions on alienation imposed by § 5 of the act of February 8, 1887,24 Stat. 388, c. 119, on an
Little v. Williams
LITTLE v. WILLIAMS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 8. Submitted October 30, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. In this case, held that the interpretation by the State Court of a stipulation of counsel was not open to
Eastern Extension, Australasia & China Telegraph Co. v. United States
EASTERN EXTENSION, AUSTRALASIA AND CHINA TELEGRAPH COMPANY, LIMITED, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 419. Argued October 22, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. While the act of March 3, 1887, c. 359, 24 Stat. 505, broade
Sturges & Burn Manufacturing Co. v. Beauchamp
STURGES & BURN MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. BEAUCHAMP. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 54. Submitted November 3, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. A State is entitled to prohibit the employment oí persons of tender years
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Garrett
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. GARRETT ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF KENTUCKY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP KENTUCKY. No. 23. Argued April 4, 1912. Decided De
United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
UNITED STATES v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. No. 385. Argued January 16, 17, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. Premises occupied, and used by a common carrier as a depot or freight station
Mayor of Vicksburg v. Henson
MAYOR AND ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF VICKSBURG v. HENSON, RECEIVER OF THE VICKSBURG WATER WORKS COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 546. Argued October 28, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. A decree of th
Marshall v. Dye
MARSHALL, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, v. DYE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 401. Argued October 23, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. Where a board of public officials is a continuing body, notwithstanding its
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Brewer
YAZOO AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. BREWER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 62. Argued November 12, 13, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. Dushane v. Beall, 161 U. S. 513, followed, to effect that the two
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES FOR THE BENEFIT OF BARTLETT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 50. Argued November 6, 7, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. A bond given pursuant to t
Straus v. American Publishers' Ass'n
STRAUS AND STRAUS, COMPOSING THE FIRM OF R. H. MACY & COMPANY, v. AMERICAN PUBLISHERS’ ASSOCIATION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 19. Argued March 7, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. One who sets up a Federal statu
United States ex rel. Goldberg v. Daniels
UNITED STATES EX REL. GOLDBERG v. DANIELS, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 79. Argued November 14, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. The United States, as the owner in possession of proper
Kener v. La Grange Mills
KENER, ADMINISTRATOR OF KENER, v. LA GRANGE MILLS. ERROR TO THE -SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP GEORGIA. No. 63. Argued November 13, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. A state constitution cannot exempt property from existing liens nor can Cong
Union Pacific Railroad v. Sides
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. SIDES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. No. 683. Submitted October 14, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. Decided on the authority of Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Snow, ante, p. 204. 133 P
Union Pacific Railroad v. Snow
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. SNOW. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. No. 682. Submitted October 14, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. Courts will not enforce a literal interpretation of a statute if antecedent rights a
Union Pacific Railroad v. Laramie Stock Yards Co.
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. LARAMIE STOCK YARDS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING. No. 570. Submitted October 14, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. The first rule of construction of st
United States v. Davis
UNITED STATES v. DAVIS. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP MISSOURI. No. 395. Argued October 17, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. On a direct appeal from an order quashing an indictment this court as
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Houston
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. HOUSTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 57. Submitted November 11, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. Decided on the authority of Northern Pacific Railway Company v, Wass, 219 U. S
Torres v. Lothrop, Luce & Co.
TORRES v. LOTHROP, LUCE & COMPANY. APPEAL FROM AND IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. No. 17. Argued October 31, 1913. Decided December 1, 1913. The due process clause of the Federal Constitution does not control mere forms of pro
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.