Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Conley
CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. CONLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OF THE STATE OP WEST VIRGINIA. No. 111. Argued April 8, 1912. — Decided June 16, 1913. Where the state cour
Knott v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Colorado Railroad
KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS, v. ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD CO. ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD CO. v. KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS. APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL PROM THE
Knott v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.
KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY CO. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. KNOTT. APPEALS AND CROSS-APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR TH
Missouri Rate Cases
MISSOURI RATE CASES. APPEALS AND CROSS APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT-OF THE. UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Nos. 9, 12, Nos. 339, 340, 341, 342, 345, 346, 349, 350, 351, 352, 357, 358, 365,366, 367, 368, argued October
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Tucker
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. TUCKER. ERROR, TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP KANSAS. No. 52. Submitted November 14, 1912. — Decided June 16, 1913. To require a railroad company to charge such rates for transportation as prevent i
Nalle v. Oyster
NALLE v. OYSTER. ERROR TO' THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 218. Submitted April 16, 1913. — Decided June 16, 1913. The practice of bills of exceptions is statutory under the.Statute of Westminster, 2, 13 Edw. I, c. 31,
Ochoa v. Hernandez
OCHOA v. HERNANDEZ Y MORALES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR EORTO RICO. No. 92. Submitted December 17, 1912. — Decided June 16, 1913. Under § 35 of the Foraker Act, appeals from the District Court of the United Sta
Butts v. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co.
BUTTS v. MERCHANTS & MINERS TRANSPORTATION CO. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 131. Argued January 21, 1913. — Decided June 16, 1913. Where the greater p^rt of a statute is unconstitut
Omaha Electric Light & Power Co. v. City of Omaha
OMAHA ELECTRIC LIGHT AND POWER CO. v. CITY OF OMAHA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 162. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 23, 1911, and postponed to the hearing on the merits. Argued Februa
Old Colony Trust Co. v. City of Omaha
OLD COLONY TRUST COMPANY v. CITY OF OMAHA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 754. Argued February 27, 28, 1913. Reargued April 10, 13, 1913. —Decided June 16, 1913. A municipality, being a
Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City
BOISE ARTESIAN HOT AND COLD WATER COMPANY, LIMITED, v. BOISE CITY. (NO. 2.) ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 313. Argued May 7, 8, 1913. — Decided June 16, 1913. Where jurisdiction of the Circuit Court is inv
Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City
BOISE ARTESIAN HOT AND COLD WATER CO., LIMITED, v. BOISE CITY; BOISE CITY v. BOISE ARTESIAN HOT AND COLD WATER CO., LIMITED. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO. Nos. 573, 639. Argued May 7-, 8, 1913.
City of Owensboro v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.
CITY OF OWENSBORO v. CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 244. Argued April 22, 1913. — Decided June 16, 1913. Rights conferred by a municipal ordi
Arizona Copper Co. v. Gillespie
ARIZONA COPPER COMPANY, LIMITED, v. GILLESPIE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 106. Argued January 27, 28, 1913. — Decided June 16, 1913. In Arizona, by statute, all rivers, streams, and running waters are dec
Ex parte American Steel Barrel Co.
EX PARTE AMERICAN STEEL BARREL CO. AND SEAMAN. PETITION EOS, WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND RULE. No. 14, Original: Argued April 21, 1913'. — Decided June 16, 1913. Tho. proceeding to retire' for .personal' bias or. prejudice a trial judge of • .a Un
Hughes v. United States
HUGHES v. UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES v. HUGHES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 718, 719. Submitted January 10, 1913. — Decided June 16, 1913. Jackson v. United States, ante, p. 599, followed to effect- that the United States is no
Jackson v. United States
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 720. Submitted January; 10, 1913. — Decided June 16, 1913. This court considers it a grave error for the court charged with the duty of making findings of fact to include mere c
Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Blair
No. 1135. The Farmers' Loan & Trust Company, Trustee, Petitioner, v. Frank W. Blair et al. June 16, 1913. Mr. Frederick Getter, Mr. Hinton E. Spalding and Mr. Edward H. Blanc for the petitioner. Mr. Henry M. Campbell, Mr. Hal H. Smith, Mr.
Newport News Ship Building & Dry Dock Co. v. The Steamboat Saratoga
No. 1136. Newport News Ship Building & Dry Dock Company, Petitioner, v. The Steamboat Saratoga, etc. June 10, 1913. Mr. Samuel Park, Mr. H. E. ■ Mattison and Mr. J. E. Carpenter for the petitioner. Mr. C. C. Burlingham for the respondent.
Higgins v. Eaton
No. 1114. Susan C. Higgins, Petitioner, v. Hervey E. Eaton, Executor, etc. June 10, 1913. Mr. A. F. Freeman for the petitioner. Mr. Edwin H. Risley for the respondent.
American Street Flushing Machine Co. v. St. Louis Street Flushing Machine Co.
No. 1090. American Street Flushing Machine Company, Petitioner, v. St. Louis Street Flushing Machine Company et al. June 10, 1913. Mr. Clifton V. Edwards for the petitioner. Mr. John D. Johnson and Mr. Jas. A. Carr for the respondents.
City of Paducah v. East Tennessee Telephone Co.
CITY OF PADUCAH, KENTUCKY, v. EAST TENNESSEE TELEPHONE COMPANY APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 246. Argued April 22, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. The test of finality of a decree
Charlton v. Kelly
CHARLTON v. KELLY, SHERIFF OF HUDSON COUNTY, NEW JERSEY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 232. Argued April 18, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. The rule that a writ of habeas^corpus cannot.
Continental & Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.
CONTINENTAL & COMMERCIAL TRUST & SAVINGS BANK v. CHICAGO TITLE & TRUST COMPANY, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF PRINCE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ’APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 741. Argued January 6, 1913. Decided June 10, 1913. To c
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.