Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ex parte America Capo
No. 8. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of America Capo, Petitioner. On petition for writ of mandamus. Argued November 10, 11, 1913. Decided November 17, 1913. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. F. H. Dexter for the petitioner. Mr. Malcolm D
Straus v. Foxworth
STRAUS v. FOXWORTH. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 191. Submitted October 20, 1913. Decided November 17, 1913. A statement that a statutory sale was not sufficiently advertised is a pure conclusion of law
Buchser v. Buchser
BUCHSER v. BUCHSER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 641. Submitted November 3, 1913. Decided November 17, 1913. Unless the statutes of the United States control, this court follows the state court as to w
Munsey v. Webb
MUNSEY v. WEBB, ADMINISTRATOR OF PENNINGTON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 40. Argued November 4, 5, 1913. Decided November 17, 1913. Where the possibility of their occurrence is clear to the ordinarily prud
United States v. Whitridge
UNITED STATES v. WHITRIDGE, RECEIVER OF THE THIRD AVENUE RAILROAD COMPANY. UNITED STATES v. JOLINE AND ROBINSON, RECEIVERS OF THE METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 4
Clement National Bank v. Vermont
CLEMENT NATIONAL BANK, v. STATE OF VERMONT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF VERMONT. No. 29. Argued April 28, 29, 1913. Decided November 10, 1913. A tax upon deposits in a national bank to be paid by the depositors held in this c
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. United States
MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY OF TEXAS v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 439. Submitted October 24, 1913. Decided November 10, 1913. Under the Hours of Service Act of March 4,
Alzua v. Johnson
ALZUA v. JOHNSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 306. Motion to affirm submitted October 27, 1913. Decided November 10, 1913. This court is slow to revise the judgment of the highest court of a Territory on matter
Summers v. United States
SUMMERS v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 502. Argued October 22, 23, 1913. Decided November 10, 1913. The court will if possible avoid construing a code of procedure as establishing a d
Virginia v. West Virginia
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. MOTION OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA TO PROCEED TO A FINAL HEARING. No. 2, Original. Submitted October 14, 1913. Decided November 10, 1913. In a controvérsy between States, this court will not
Lovell v. Henry Hentz & Co.
No. 221. William S. Lovell, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry Hentz & Company et al. In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 27,
Roney v. Van Ness
No. 688. John Roney et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. H. J. Van Ness. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California. Motion to dismiss submitted October 27, 1913. Decided November 3, 1913. Mr. A. 'E. Bolton for the plaintiffs in er
Kirkpatrick v. Harnesberger
No. 516. M. V. Kirkpatrick, Appellant, v. Wyatt A. Harnesberger, Trustee, etc. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia. Motion to dismiss submitted October 15, 1913. Decided November 3, 1913.
Baltic Mining Co. v. Massachusetts
BALTIC MINING COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. S. S. WHITE DENTAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OP THE STATE OP MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 30, 353. Argued April 29, 30, 1913. D
Mechanics' & Metals National Bank v. Ernst
MECHANICS’ AND METALS NATIONAL BANK OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK v. ERNST ET AL., AS TRUSTEES IN BANKRUPTCY OF HUMPHREY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 446. Argued October 20, 1913. Decided November 3, 1913.
National City Bank v. Hotchkiss
NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK v. HOTCHKISS, AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF HASKINS. HOTCHKISS, AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF HASKINS, v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 459,
Glenwood Light & Water Co. v. Town of Glenwood Springs
No. 575. The Glenwood Light & Water Company, Appellant, v. The Town of Glenwood Springs. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 21, 1913. Decided October
Ex parte Assets Collecting Co.
No. —. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Assets Collecting Company, Petitioner. Submitted October 14, 1913. Decided October 20, 1913. Mr. Ferdinand E. M. Bullowaund Mr. Richard S. Harvey for the petitioner.
United States v. Sandoval
UNITED STATES v. SANDOVAL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP NEW MEXICO. No. 352. Argued February 27, 1913. Decided October 20, 1913. Congress has power to make conditions in an Enabling Act, and require t
Luria v. United States
LURIA v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 27. Argued April 23, 1913. Decided October 20, 1913. Where a point involving sufficiency of the complaint is not raised a
Wood v. Vandalia Railroad
WOOD v. VANDALIA RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 11. Argued December 17, 1912. Decided October 20, 1913. An order of a state railroad commission prescribing maximum freig
Allen v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
ALLEN ET AL., RAILROAD COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, v. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. SAME v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTR
Southern Pacific Co. v. Campbell
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY AND OREGON & CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. CAMPBELL ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF OREGON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 428. ■Argued April 9, 1
Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Campbell
OREGON RAILROAD & NAVIGATION COMPANY v. CAMPBELL, ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF OREGON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 159. Argued April 8, 9, 1912. Decided June 16, 1913
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.