Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1914 Cases
315 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Smith v. Texas
SMITH v. STATE OF TEXAS. ERROR TO THE COURT OP CRIMINAL APPEALS OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. No. 268. Argued March 12, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914. Life, liberty, property and equal protection of the laws as grouped to-, gether in the Constitution
Logan v. Davis
LOGAN v. DAVIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 247. Submitted March 9, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914. Under § 237, Judicial Code, this court has jurisdiction to review a judgment of a state court denying a claim duly set
Gompers v. United States
GOMPERS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO, APPEAL PROM AND ON PETITION FOR CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. Nos. 640, 574. Argued January 7, 8, 1914; restored to docket for reargument April 6, 1914; reargued April 20
Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Arizona & Colorado Railroad
DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPANY v. ARIZONA AND COLORADO RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW MEXICO. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP ' NEW MEXICO. No. 188. Argued April 22, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914. This court is slow to distu
Cornell Steamboat Co. v. Phœnix Construction Co.
CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY v. PHŒNIX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. EREOR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YOEK. Nos. 933, 934, 935. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 27, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914. While
Apapas v. United States
APAPAS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 746. Argued April 8, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914. The right of direct review by this court of a judgment of the District C
Itow v. United States
ITOW AND FUSHIMI v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, DIVISION NO. I, TERRITORY OF ALASKA. No. 714. Argued April 8, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914. Judicial Code, § 134, governing the right to review cases in the
Southern Railway Co. v. Gadd
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. GADD. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 645. Argued April 15, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914. In a case in which the writ of error directed to the Circuit Court of Appeals
Green v. Menominee Tribe
GREEN v. MENOMINEE TRIBE. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP .CLAIMS. No. 285. Argued March 13, 16, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914. Section 2 of the act of May 29, 1908, c. 216, 35 Stat. 144, conferring jurisdiction on the Court of Claims to hear and det
Ex parte Strub
No. -. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Daniel E. Strub, Petitioner. Submitted April 27, 1914. Decided May 4, 1914. Mr. Joe Kirby for the petitioner.
Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.
RICHARDS v. WASHINGTON TERMINAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 52. Argued November 7, 1913. Decided May 4, 1914. Although in England, Parliament, being omnipotent, may authorize the taking of private
Holden Land & Live Stock Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co.
HOLDEN LAND AND LIVE STOCK COMPANY v. INTER-STATE TRADING COMPANY. EBBOB TO THE SUPBEME COUBT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 354. Argued February 26, 27, 1914. Decided May 4, 1914. Where the judgment of the state court rests upon an independen
Bowling & Miami Investment Co. v. United States
BOWLING AND MIAMI INVESTMENT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 177. Submitted April 17, 1914. Decided May 4, 1914. The guardianship of the United States over allottee Indians does
United States v. Foster
UNITED STATES v. FOSTER. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 838. Argued April 13, 14, 1914. Decided May 4, 1914. Where the case is one of statutory construction, consideration of the stat
United States v. Vulte
UNITED STATES v. VULTE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 256. Argued March 10, 1914; Restored to docket for reargument April 6, 1914; Reargued April 21, 22, 1914. Decided May 4, 1914. A statute which fixes the annual salary of a public
Egan v. New Jersey
No. 738. Stephen M. Egan, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of New Jersey. In error to the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 20, 1914. Decided April 27, 1914. Mr. John Frankli
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Horton
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. HORTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 691. Argued February 27, 1914. Decided April 27, 1914. A writ of error in terms returnable within thirty days from the date thereof substant
Baer Bros. Mercantile Co. v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad
BAER BROTHERS MERCANTILE COMPANY v. DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 140. Argued December 16, 17, 1913. Decided April 27, 1914. Awarding reparation for excessive charges
Illinois Central Railroad v. Behrens
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. BEHRENS, ADMINISTRATOR. CERTIFICATE PROM’ THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 241. Argued March 6, 1914. Decided April 27, 1914. When a railroad is a highway for both interstate and i
Thaddeus Davids Co. v. Davids Manufacturing Co.
THADDEUS DAVIDS COMPANY v. DAVIDS MANUFACTURING COMPANY. CEETIOEAEI TO THE CIECUIT COUET OF APPEALS FOE THE SECOND CIECUIT. No. 184. Argued January 22, 1914. Decided April 27, 1914. A trade-mark consisting of an ordinary surname is not the
San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. County of Stanislaus
SAN JOAQUIN AND KINGS RIVER CANAL AND IRRIGATION COMPANY v. COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 303, Argued March 18, 1914. Decide
Nadal v. May
NADAL v. MAY. ERROR to the district court of the united states for PORTO RICO. No. 130. Submitted December 12, 1913; Restored to docket for reargument January 26, 1914; Reargued April 6, 7, 1914. Decided April 20, 1914. The Civil Code of Po
Wheeler v. Sohmer
WHEELER v. SOHMER, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SURROGATES’ COURT OF NEW YORK COUNTY, STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 45. Argued November 5, 6, 1913. Decided April 20, 1914. The provision in the New York Inheritance Tax Statute
German Alliance Insurance v. Lewis
GERMAN ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY v. LEWIS, SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ' FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 120. Argued December 10, 1913. Decided April 20, 1914. ■The
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.