Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1915 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Wright v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
WRIGHT, COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF GEORGIA, v. CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP GEORGIA. No. 161. Argued January 28, 29, 1915. Decided March 22, 1915. This cour
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Padgett
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. PADGETT, ADMINISTRATRIX OF PADGETT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 710. Argued February 24, 1915. Decided March 22, 1915. Where plaintiff in error seeks to review under § 237, Jud
Ex parte Sheckels
No. —. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Helen C. Sheckels, Petitioner. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus submitted March 8, 1915. Decided March 15, 1915. Mr. John Baurn for the petitioner.
A. J. Phillips Co. v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.
A. J. PHILLIPS COMPANY v. GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILWAY CO. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 124. Argued January 15, 1915. Decided March 15, 1915. A finding by the Interstate Commerce Commission in a general in
American Seeding Machine Co. v. Kentucky
AMERICAN SEEDING MACHINE COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 175. Argued March 5, 1915. Decided March 15, 1915. International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U. S. 216, followed to
McCormick v. Oklahoma City
McCORMICK v. OKLAHOMA CITY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 170. Argued March 4, 1915. Decided March 15, 1915. Where the bill presents a case of diversity of citizenship only, the decree of the Circuit C
Wilson Cypress Co. v. Del Pozo y Marcos
WILSON CYPRESS COMPANY v. DEL POZO Y MARCOS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 135. Argued January 19, 1915. Decided March 15, 1915. Although the jurisdiction of the Federal court may have been invoked sole
Caldwell v. Bauer
No. 171. George W. Caldwell et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Carl E. Bauer et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Indiana. Argued March 4 and 5, 1915. Decided March 8, 1915. Mr. Wm. J. Wkinery and Mr. Addison C. Harris for the
Michigan Central Railroad v. Michigan Railroad Commission
MICHIGAN CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. MICHIGAN RAILROAD COMMISSION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 91. Submitted December 1, 1914. Decided March 8, 1915. A State, in virtue of its authority to regulate railroads as
Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Conley
NORFOLK AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CONLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KANAWHA COUNTY, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 197. Argued October 13, 1914. Decided March 8, 1915. Northern Pacific R
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota ex rel. McCue
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA ON RELATION OF McCUE, ATTORNEY GENERAL. MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILWAY COMPANY v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. Nos. 420, 421. Argu
Ramapo Water Co. v. City of New York
RAMAPO WATER COMPANY v. CITY OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 715. Argued February 24, 1915. Decided March 8, 1915. Where the constitution of the State reserves the
Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. United States
LINN & LANE TIMBER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. SAME v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 46, 169. Argued January 27, 28, 1915. Decided March 8, 1915. This court follows the findings of fact of two cou
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Thornton
No. 509. Seaboard Air Line Railway, Plaintiff in Error, v. Ella M. Thornton, as Administratrix, etc. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina. Argued February 24, 1915. Decided March 1, 1915. Mr. J. J. Darlington for the
Kirmeyer v. Kansas
KIRMEYER v. STATE OF KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 145. Argued January 22, 1915. Decided March 1, 1915. Beer is a recognized article of commerce, and the right to send it from one State to another, and the a
McCoach v. Pratt
McCOACH, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. PRATT, EXECUTOR OF DREER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 149. Argued January 25, 1915. Decided March 1, 1915. Where testator died before July 1, 1902, but cre
Gleason v. Thaw
GLEASON v. THAW. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 143. Submitted January 19, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. Professional services of an attorney and counselor-at-law are not property within the meanin
Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 80. Argued January 18, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. Statutes should be sensibly construed, with a view- to effectuating
Joplin Mercantile Co. v. United States
JOPLIN MERCANTILE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 648. Argued January 11, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. A mere conspiracy without overt acts done to effect its object is no
United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 125. Argued January 15, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. Under the terms of the contract involved in this case for
United States v. Midwest Oil Co.
UNITED STATES v. MIDWEST OIL COMPANY. APPEAR FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 278. Argued January 9, 12, 1914; restored to docket April 20, 1914; reargued May 7, 1914. Decided February 23, 1915. Prior to initiat
Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. Slavin
TOLEDO, ST. LOUIS AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. SLAVIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 147. Submitted January 20, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. Where the ruling of the trial court in an action for personal injurie
Lehman, Stern & Co. v. S. Gumbel & Co.
LEHMAN, STERN & COMPANY, LIMITED, v. S. GUMBEL & COMPANY, LIMITED. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 146. Argued January 22, 1915. Decided February 23, 1915. This court cannot entertain argument based on the theory t
Southern Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of Indiana
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF INDIANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 107. Argued December 9, 1914. Decided February 23, 1915. If the car is moving on a railroad engaged in interstate commerce i
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.