Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1915 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Mackenzie v. Hare
MACKENZIE v. HARE ET AL., BOARD OF ELECTION OF SAN FRANCISCO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 79. Argued November 11, 12, 1915. Decided December 6, 1915. In construing a statute, whatever was said or given promine
De Villanueva v. Villanueva
DE VILLANUEVA v. VILLANUEVA. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 65. Argued November 9, 1915. Decided December 6, 1915. The court has jurisdiction to review the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Philippine Island
Elzaburu v. Chaves
ELZABURU v. CHAVES. APPEAL EEOM THE SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. No. 52. Submitted November 1, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. The former practice in regard to appeals from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico provided by § 35 of the Foraker Ac
Phoenix Railway Co. v. Geary
PHOENIX RAILWAY COMPANY v. GEARY ET AL., CORPORATION COMMISSION OF ARIZONA. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THP DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. No. 48. Submitted October 29, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. The Federal court ha
Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co.
BAILEY, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF GRANT, v. BAKER ICE MACHINE COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 42. Argued November 2, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. After reviewing cases- on conditional sale of
Houck v. Little River Drainage District
HOUCK v. LITTLE RIVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 35. Argued October 27, 28, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. So far as the Federal Constitution is concerned, a State may defray the entire exp
O'Neill v. Leamer
O’NEILL v. LEAMER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 33. Argued October 25, 26, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. The propriety of delegating authority by the legislature to a court in the matter of formation of draina
Johnson v. Wells Fargo & Co.
JOHNSON, TREASURER OF STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY. SAME v. TAYLOR, PRESIDENT OF AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 277, 278. Argued October 12, 13, 1915. Deci
William Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co. v. United States
WILLIAM CRAMP AND SONS SHIP AND ENGINE BUILDING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 63. Argued November 8, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. A finding by the Court of Claims that there was no mutual mistake between
Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. Leser
PHILLIP WAGNER, INCORPORATED, v. LESER ET AL., JUDGES AND TAX COLLECTOR OF BALTIMORE CITY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP MARYLAND. No. 28. Argued October 25, 26, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. The Fourteenth Amendment does
New Orleans-Belize Royal Mail & Central American Steamship Co. v. United States
NEW ORLEANS-BELIZE ROYAL MAIL AND CENTRAL AMERICAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY, LIMITED, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 71. Argued November 11, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. Under the charter party in this case, the United
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Burnette
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD v. BURNETTE. error to the supreme court of the state of north CAROLINA. No. 66. Argued November 9, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. It would be a miscarriage of justice to recover upon a statute not governing th
Crane v. New York
CRANE v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE COURT OF SPECIAL SESSIONS, FIRST DISTRICT, CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 388. Argued October 12, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. A state statute regarding employment of labo
Heim v. McCall
HEIM v. McCALL. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 386. Argued October 12, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. The highest court of the State not having commented on the question of right of plaintiff as a taxpayer to
Porter v. Wilson
PORTER v. WILSON. error to the supreme court op the state op OKLAHOMA. No. 58. Submitted November 5, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. This court' accepts the decision of the highest court of the State that the state constitution was not vio
Fireball Gas Tank & Illuminating Co. v. Commercial Acetylene Co.
FIREBALL GAS TANK & ILLUMINATING COMPANY v. COMMERCIAL ACETYLENE COMPANY AND PREST-O-LITE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT; No. 13. Argued October 22, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. A process may
Norton v. Whiteside
NORTON, EXECUTOR, v. WHITESIDE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 55. Argued November 4, 5,1915. Decided November 29, 1915. A mere formal statement in the bill to the effect that the cause of action is one
Sui v. McCoy
SUI v. McCOY, INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 54. Submitted November 1, 1915. Decided November 29, 1915. The Immigration and Chinese Exclusion Laws of the
Mellon Co. v. McCafferty
MELLON COMPANY v. McCAFFERTY, COUNTY TREASURER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 27. Submitted October 22,1915. Decided November 29, 1915. Where the decree of the state court rests upon an independent non-Federal gro
Morris Canal & Banking Co. v. Baird
MORRIS CANAL AND BANKING COMPANY v. BAIRD. ERROR TO THE COURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. No. 1. Argued October 21, 1915. Decided November 21, 1915. A transfer, even though under legislative authority, of all the prope
Pennsylvania Railroad v. W. F. Jacoby & Co.
No. 139. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. W. F. Jacoby & Company. On a certificate from and writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Argued October 20,1915. Decided November 15, 1915. Mr. Franc
Glenwood Light & Water Co. v. Mutual Light, Heat & Power Co.
GLENWOOD LIGHT AND WATER COMPANY v. MUTUAL LIGHT, HEAT AND POWER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 38. Submitted October 29, 1915. Decided November 15, 1915. The jurisdictional am
United States v. Freeman
UNITED STATES v. FREEMAN. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 481. Argued October 21, 1915. Decided November 15, 1915. The act prohibited by § 240, Criminal Code, making it punishable to ship or
Provident Savings Life Assurance Society v. Kentucky
PROVIDENT SAVINGS LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 328. Argued October 20, 21, 1915. Decided November 15, 1915. The state court, having placed its decision susta
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.