Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1915 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Lancaster v. Thacker
OPINIONS PER CURIAM, ETC., FROM OCTOBER 11, 1915, TO JANUARY 17, 1916. No. 530. George D. Lancaster et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. James W. Thacker et al. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. Motion to dismiss or affi
Central Trust Co. v. Lueders
CENTRAL TRUST COMPANY OF ILLINOIS, AND TRUSTEE OF RHEINSTROM, v. LUEDERS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 445. Motion to dismiss submitted October 12, 1915. Decided October 25, 1915. The provision in § 4
Gegiow v. Uhl
GEGIOW v. UHL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION AT THE PORT OF NEW YORK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 340. Argued October 14, 15, 1915. Decided October 25, 1915. The courts haye jurisdiction to de
Cerecedo v. United States
CERECEDO v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 285. Argued October 13, 1915. Decided October 25, 1915. Postponing consideration of a motion to dismiss until the hearing of the case on the mer
United States ex rel. Brown v. Cooke
No. 354. The United States ex rel. Frederick Brown, Appellant, v. Frederick A. Cooke, Superintendent of the County Prison at Philadelphia. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Motion to dismiss or af
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Leslie
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. LESLIE, ADMINISTRATOR OF OLD. EEBOB TO THE SUPBEME COUBT OF THE STATE OF AEKANSAS. No. 538. Argued April 22, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. Under the Employers’ Liability Act as amended in 1910 and § 28
Brand v. Union Elevated Railroad
BRAND v. UNION ELEVATED RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 268. Argued May 6, 7, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. Nothing in the Federal Constitution gives any one the right to have the jury instructed th
Chater v. Carter
CHATER v. CARTER, EXECUTOR OF HARTWELL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 544. Argued April 30, May 3, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. A trust of certificates of stock to cause dividends thereon to be paid to a desi
United States v. Hiawassee Lumber Co.
UNITED STATES v. HIAWASSEE LUMBER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 133. Argued March 2, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. In an action of ejectment brought by the United States to recover a tract of land
Newman v. United States ex rel. Frizzell
NEWMAN v. UNITED STATES EX REL. FRIZZELL. EEEOE TO THE COUET OP APPEALS OP THE DISTEICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 813. Argued April 13, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. In quo warranto proceedings brought in the name of the. United States on the relatio
United States v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
UNITED STATES v. DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA AND WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 517. Argued December 9, 10, 1914. Decided June 21, 1915. A. jailroad corporation eng
Central Vermont Railway Co. v. White
CENTRAL VERMONT RAILWAY COMPANY v. WHITE, ADMINISTRATRIX OF WHITE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF VERMONT. No. 407. Argued April 23, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. The filing of a large number of assignments of error perverts the
Wells Fargo & Co. Express v. Ford
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY EXPRESS v. FORD. ERROR TO THE COUNTY COURT OP MADISON COUNTY, STATE OP TEXAS. No. 259. Submitted May 5, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. The carrier cannot be held responsible for goods taken from its custody by valid lega
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railroad v. Wisconsin
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILROAD COMPANY v. STATE OF WISCONSIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ■ WISCONSIN. No. 177. Argued March 8, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. A State cannot authorize an individual to take salable pro
Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co. v. Danaher
THE SOUTHWESTERN TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE COMPANY v. DANAHER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 43. Submitted March 17, 1914. Restored to docket April 6, 1914. Reargued April 22, 1914. Decided June 21, 1915. While it is
Mills v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
MILLS, AS SURVIVING PARTNER OF NAYLOR & COMPANY, v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 631. Argued May 11, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. In a suit under § 16 of the Act to Regulate
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Clark Bros. Coal Mining Co.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. CLARK BROTHERS COAL MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 290. Argued May 14, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. The essential character of commerce determines whether it is
Price v. Illinois
PRICE v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 274. Argued May 12, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. TKis court accepts the decision of the highest court of the State as to the construction of
Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Yurkonis
DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. YURKONIS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 852. Submitted May 3, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. Plaintiff sued railroad company for personal injuries in the s
Oregon & California Railroad v. United States
OREGON & CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 679. Argued April 23, 26, 27, 1915. Decided June 21, 1915. Where there are doubts whether a cl
United States v. Mosley
UNITED STATES v. MOSLEY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 180. Submitted October 17, 1913. Decided June 21, 1915. Section 19 of the Criminal Code, § 5508 Rev. S.tat., punishing consp
Myers v. Anderson
MYERS AND OTHERS v. ANDERSON. SAME v. HOWARD. SAME v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE- DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Nos. 8, 9, 10. Argued November 11, 1913. Decided June 21, 1915. Guinn v. United States, ante, p. 347
Guinn v. United States
GUINN AND BEAL v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 96. Argued October 17, 1913. Decided June 21, 1915. The so-called Grandfather Clause of the amendment to the constitu- . tion of Okla
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Minnesota ex rel. State Railroad & Warehouse Commission
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA EX REL. STATE RAILROAD & WAREHOUSE COMMISSION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 225. Argued April 16, 1915. Decided June 14, 1915. An order of. a state railroad c
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.