Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1915 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Southern Railway Co. v. Campbell
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CAMPBELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 53. Argued November 4, 1915. November 15, 1915. Where the only questions are whether the carrier’s rule was applicable to the case and was
Gsell v. Insular Collector of Customs
GSELL v. INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 31. Submitted May 14, 1915; ordered that briefs be filed on the jurisdictional question June 21, 1915; briefs filed October 11, 1915. Decided N
United States v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NEW YORK AND PORTO RICO STEAMSHIP COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 44. Argued November 3, 1915. Decided November 15, 1915. Even if a statute declares a transaction void f
Parker v. Monroig
PARKER v. MONROIG. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 287. Submitted October 12, 1915. Decided November 15, 1915. A community cannot enjoy an acquet free of the obligations insepar rably connected with i
Maroun v. Louisiana
No. 45. Joe Maroun, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Louisiana. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Submitted November 4, 1915. Decided November 8, 1915. Mr. A. L. Alexander and Mr. Taliaferro Alexander for the plain
Eichel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
No. 397. Laura Eichel et al., Appellants, v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 25, 1915. Decided November 8
National Bank v. Shackelford
NATIONAL BANK OF ATHENS v. SHACKELFORD, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY FOR WEBB. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 40. Argued October 29, 1915. Decided November 8, 1915. A mortgage given for valuable consideration m
United States v. Barnow
UNITED STATES v. BARNOW. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 454. Argued October 18, 1915. Decided November 8, 1915. The prohibition in §32, Criminal Code, against falsely assuming
Anderson v. Forty-Two Broadway Co.
ANDERSON, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. THE FORTY-TWO BROADWAY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 246. Argued October 18, 1915. Decided November 8, 1915. The Corporation Tax of 1909, 36 Stat.
La Roque v. United States
LA ROQUE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 240. Argued October 15, 18, 1915. Decided November 8, 1915. The Nelson Aet of January 14, 1889, c. 24, 25 Stat. 642, for allotment to Chippewas
City of New York v. Sage
CITY OF NEW YORK v. SAGE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 34. Argued October 27, 1915. Decided November 8, 1915. On condemnation proceedings adaptability to the purposes for which the land could be use
Stratton v. Stratton
STRATTON v. STRATTON. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE SEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OP THE STATE OP OHIO. No. 618. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 25, 1915. Decided November 8, 1915. A judgment of an intermediate appellate s
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Devine
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. DEVINE, ADMINISTRATOR OF MASON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 391. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 25, 1915. Decided November 8, 1915. In a suit in t
Gardiner Investment Co. v. Jackson Co.
No. 455. Gardiner Investment Company et al., Appellants, v. The Jackson Company et al. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Argued October 22 and 25, 1915. Decided November 1, 1915. Mr. Burton E. Eam
Greenlees v. Morris
No. 36. John R. Greenlees, Plaintiff in Error, v. Fred L. Morris. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Submitted October 25, 1915. Decided November 1, 1915. Mr. C. A. Magaw for the plaintiff in error. Mr. John F. Switzer an
Pennsylvania Co. v. Donat
PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY v. DONAT. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 564. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 18, 1915. Decided November 1, 1915. In an action based on the Employers’ Liability Act the trial co
Briggs v. United Shoe Machinery Co.
BRIGGS v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 638. Submitted October 12, 1915. Decided November 1, 1915. A suit for royalties reserved upon the sale o
Rio Grande Western Railway Co. v. Stringham
RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. STRINGHAM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP UTAH. Nos. 4, 5. Submitted October 19, 1915. Decided November 1, 1915. A railway company brought suit to establish its title under the Right-of-Way
Truax v. Raich
TRUAX AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA v. RAICH. APPÉAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. No. 361. Argued October 16, 1915. Decided November 1, 1915. A suit against officers of. the St
Manila Investment Co. v. Trammell
MANILA INVESTMENT COMPANY v. TRAMMELL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 250. Motion to affirm or dismiss submitted October 12, 1915. Decided November 1, 1915. Mere breach of contr
Steinfeld v. Zeckendorf
STEINFELD v. ZECKENDORF. APPEAL FROM AND ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA. No. 239. Argued October 19, 20, 1915. Decided November 1, 1915. A court is not precluded from construing a document because its construction is aff
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Riefler
UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY v. RIEFLER. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 11. Argued October 27, 1915. Decided November 1, 1915. An instrument agreeing to indemnify a bond company for
Stewart v. City of Kansas
STEWART, TREASURER WYANDOTTE COUNTY, KANSAS, v. CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 284. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 18, 1915. Decided November 1, 1915. What the duty of a co
First National Bank v. Eberhart
No. 155. First National Bank of Belle Fourche, S. Dak., Plaintiff in Error, v. Adolph O. Eberhart et al. In error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. Motion to dismiss submitted October 18, 1915. Decide
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.