Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1917 Cases
256 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Brooks v. Empire Trust Co.
No. 697. Sidney J. Brooks, Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Empire Trust Company et al. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Motion to dismiss submitted December 10, 1917. Decided December 17, 1917. Mr.
Southern Pacific Co. v. Stewart
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. STEWART. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 348. Motion to dismiss submitted November 5, 1917. Decided December 17, 1917. Where the complaint states a cause of action against a commo
McGowan v. Columbia River Packers' Ass'n
McGOWAN ET AL. v. COLUMBIA RIVER PACKERS’ ASSOCIATION ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 78. Argued November 22, 23, 1917. Decided December 17, 1917. As decided by this court iu Washington v, Oregon,
Skarderud v. Tax Commission
No. 507. Elina Skarderud, Plaintiff in Error, v. Tax Commission of the State of North Dakota. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota. Submitted November 23, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. Mr. Edward Engerud for plainti
New York ex rel. New York & Queens Gas Co. v. McCall
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. NEW YORK & QUEENS GAS COMPANY v. McCALL ET AL., COMMISSIONERS, CONSTITUTING THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NE
United States v. California Bridge & Construction Co.
UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA BRIDGE & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. CALIFORNIA BRIDGE & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 39, 40. Argued November 9, 12, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. Claimant .entered i
Korbly v. Springfield Institution for Savings
KORBLY, RECEIVER OF THE PYNCHON NATIONAL BANK, v. SPRINGFIELD INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS ET AL. SPRINGFIELD INSTITUTION FOR SAVINGS ET AL. v. KORBLY, RECEIVER OF THE PYNCHON NATIONAL BANK. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FIRS
Jones v. Buffalo Creek Coal & Coke Co.
JONES ET AL. v. BUFFALO CREEK COAL & COKE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 293. Argued November 5, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. Error committed by the District Cou
United States v. Ness
UNITED STATES v. NESS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 284. Argued November 5, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. The filing of a certificate of arrival, as provided in § 4, subdivision 2, of the Natural
Burton v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
BURTON v. NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY. HEEREN v. NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. Nos. 71, 72. Argued November 21, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. A
Hull v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
HULL, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF PALMER, v. FARMERS’ LOAN & TRUST COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 66. Argued November 19, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. A New York testator bequeathed a fund in trust
Duncan Townsite Co. v. Lane
DUNCAN TOWNSITE COMPANY v. LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 51. Argued November 15, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. An allotment certificate issued, under the Choctaw-Chickasaw
Crane v. Campbell
CRANE v. CAMPBELL, SHERIFF OF LATAH COUNTY, IDAHO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP IDAHO. No. 53. Argued November 15, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. A State may prohibit and punish the possession of intoxicating liquor for pers
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. North Carolina
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 18. Submitted November 7, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. The power of a State under the Webb-Kenyon Law to forbid shipmen
Crew Levick Co. v. Pennsylvania
CREW LEVICK COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. error to the supreme court of the state of PENNSYLVANIA. No. 499. Argued October 17, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. This court determines the constitutionality of a state tax upon its o
Schneider Granite Co. v. Gast Realty & Investment Co.
SCHNEIDER GRANITE COMPANY v. GAST REALTY & INVESTMENT COMPANY ET AL. GAST REALTY & INVESTMENT COMPANY ET AL. v. SCHNEIDER GRANITE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. Nos. 461, 473. Argued October 11, 12, 1917. Deci
Eagle Glass & Manufacturing Co. v. Rowe
EAGLE GLASS & MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. ROWE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN FLINT GLASS WORKERS’ UNION, ET AL. APPEAL FROM AND' CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 23. Submitted December 18,
Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. Mitchell
HITCHMAN COAL & COKE COMPANY v. MITCHELL, INDIVIDUALLY, ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 11. Argued March 2, 3, 1916; restored to docket for reargument March 13, 1916; reargued December 15, 18, 1
Kirk v. Olson
KIRK ET AL. v. OLSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 81. Argued November 23, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. A finding of mineral character made in allowing an entry under the placer mining law is subject to b
Jones v. City of Portland
JONES ET AL v. CITY OF PORTLAND. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OP THE STATE OP MAINE. No. 77. Argued November 22, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. Establishing and maintaining a public yard for the sale of wood, coal and other fuel, w
Stevirmac Oil & Gas Co. v. Dittman
STEVIRMAC OIL & GAS COMPANY v. DITTMAN ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE' EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 131. Submitted October 22, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. A party against whom a default judgment ha
Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Baldwin
ABERCROMBIE & FITCH COMPANY ET AL. v. BALDWIN ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 67. Argued November 19, 20, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. The Baldwin patent, original No. 821,580, reissue No. 1
Sweet v. Schock
SWEET ET AL. v. SCHOCK, TREASURER OF OKMULGEE COUNTY, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 52. Argued November 15, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. Under the Act of April 26,1906, § 19, c. 1876,
Looney v. Crane Co.
LOONEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, v. CRANE COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. No. 16. Argued May 3, 1916; restored to docket for reargument May 21, 1917; reargued N
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.