Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1917 Cases
256 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Duus v. Brown
DUUS, ADMINISTRATOR OF PETERSON, v. BROWN, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF IOWA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP IOWA. No. 85. Argued November 23, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. A naturalized citizen of the United States, residing in
Petersen v. Iowa ex rel. State Treasurer
PETERSEN ET AL., LEGATEES OF ANDERSON, v. STATE OF IOWA EX REL. THE STATE TREASURER, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 74. Argued November 21, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. Article 7 of the treaty with Denmark o
United States ex rel. Arant v. Lane
UNITED STATES EX REL. ARANT v. LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 44. Argued November 13, 14, 1917. Decided December 10, 1917. Judgments or decrees of the Court of Appeals
Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Gilbert
PHILADELPHIA & READING COAL & IRON COMPANY v. GILBERT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 454. Argued November 6, 1917. Decided November 26, 1917. A Pennsylvania corporation was sued in New York, where it transacted bu
Day v. United States
DAY ET AL., PARTNERS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF J. G. & I. N. DAY, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 43. Argued November 13, 1917. Decided November 26, 1917. Modem tendencies to depart from the strict letter in discovering
Wear v. Kansas ex rel. Brewster
WEAR, IMPLEADED SUB. NOM. WEAR SAND COMPANY, ET AL. v. STATE OF KANSAS EX REL. BREWSTER, ATTORNEY GENERAL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 30. Argued November 12, 1917. Decided November 26, 1917. A specific intent to
Germania Refining Co. v. Fuller
No. 46. Germania Refining Company et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Oramel B. Fuller, Auditor General et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Michigan. Argued November 14, 1917. Decided November 19, 1917. Mr. Charles D. Chamberli
Enterprise Railway Equipment Co. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
No. 69. Enterprise Railway Equipment Company, Appellant, v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. Submitted November 16, 1917. Decided November 19, 1917
Bellows Falls Power Co. v. Massachusetts
No. 59. Bellows Falls Power Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Ip error to the Supreme Judicial Court of thé State of Massachusetts. Argued November 16, 1917. Decided November 19, 1917. Mr. Bichard Y. FitzGerald
Gould v. Gould
GOULD v. GOULD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT O'F THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 41. Submitted November 8, 1917. Decided November 19, 1917. Alimony paid monthly to a divorced wife under a decree of court is not taxable, as “income” under the Incom
Hartford Life Insurance v. Barber
HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BARBER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. Nos. 252, 253. Argued November 5, 6, 1917. Decided November 19, 1917. In a suit against a life insurance company by its certificate holders, it
Moran v. Central Railroad
No. 150. Eugene W. Moran, Plaintiff in Error, v. Central Railroad Company of New Jersey. In error, to the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey. Submitted November 5, 1917. Decided November 12, 1917. Mr. Frank M. Harden-bro
United States ex rel. T. H. Kessler & Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.
No. 34. United States of America for the use of T. H. Kessler & Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Title Guaranty & Surety Company. In'error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Argued November 8, 1917. Decided
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission
ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 199. Argued October 12, 15, 1917. Decided Novem
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Kansas ex rel. Brewster
No. 28. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of Kansas ex rel. S. M. Brewster, Attorney General, etc., et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas., Submitted October 18, 1917. Decided
Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police
BIDDINGER v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 426. Argued October 10, 11, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. Article IV, § 2, of the
Scharrenberg v. Dollar Steamship Co.
SCHARRENBERG v. DOLLAR STEAMSHIP COMPANY ET. AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOB THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 192. Argued October 12, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. Inducing and assisting aliens to come from abroad, working as sea
Kelley v. Gill
KELLEY, TRUSTEE OF THE GIBRALTAR INVESTMENT AND HOME BUILDING COMPANY, BANKRUPT, v. GILL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 411. Submitted October 2, 1917. Decided November 5, 1
Hendrickson v. Creager
HENDRICKSON, JUDGE OF THE COUNTY COURT OF TAYLOR COUNTY, KENTUCKY, v. CREAGER. SAME v. GARDNER. SAME v. HOCKER. SAME v. STERLING LAND & INVESTMENT COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 428, 429, 430
Hendrickson v. Apperson
HENDRICKSON, JUDGE OF THE COUNTY COURT OF TAYLOR COUNTY, KENTUCKY, v. APPERSON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 427. Argued October 11, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. A valid judgment was recovered aga
Eichel v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
EICHEL ET AL. v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT . OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 571. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 8, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. Appellant having brought
United States v. Chase
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AS TRUSTEE AND GUARDIAN OF THE OMAHA TRIBE OF INDIANS, ET AL., v. CHASE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 146. Argued October 2, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. The assignment
Gauzon v. Compañia General de Tabacos de Filipinas
GAUZON v. COMPAÑIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS. APPEAL FROM AND IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 437. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 15, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. In a proceeding for the
Ex parte Park & Tilford
EX PARTE PARK & TILFORD, PETITIONER. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 24. Original. Argued October 15, 16, 1917. Rule discharged November 5, 1917. Mandamus will not issue from this court to compel a subordinate court to make a particular
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.