Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1917 Cases
256 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Knauth, Nachod & Kuhne v. Latham & Co.
KNAUTH, NACHOD & KUHNE v. LATHAM & COMPANY ET AL. JAFFE ET AL., SURVIVING MEMBERS OF THE FIRM OF KNAUTH, NACHOD & KUHNE, v. LOVELL, AS CUSTODIAN, &c., AND AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF KNIGHT, YANCEY & COMPANY, ET AL. JAFFE ET AL., SURVIVING
Louisville Bridge Co. v. United States
LOUISVILLE BRIDGE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 540. Argued December 8, 11, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. The Acts of July 14, 1862, c. 167, 12 Stat.
Newark Natural Gas & Fuel Co. v. City of Newark
NEWARK NATURAL GAS & FUEL COMPANY v. CITY OF NEWARK, OHIO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OHIO. No. 232. Argued December 4, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. A city ordinance fixing the maximum rate chargeable by a gas company will
Baker v. Baker, Eccles & Co.
BAKER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF BAKER, v. BAKER, ECCLES & COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS OE THE STATE OE KENTUCKY. No. 115. Argued December 19, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. The rule that the personal estate of a
Harnage v. Martin
HARNAGE ET AL. v. MARTIN ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF .THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 112. Argued December 19, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. Of two qualified, applicants for an.allotment finder § 11 of the Cherokee Agreement of 1902 (A
Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Clough
LAKE SHORE & MICHIGAN SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. CLOUGH ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP INDIANA. No. 87. Argued November 9, 10, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. By the terms of the Indiana Railway Law of May 11,1852,
Dickson v. Luck Land Co.
DICKSON v. LUCK LAND COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 600. Submitted December 6, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. Issuance of a.'fee-simple patent for an allotment in the White Earth Indian Reservation, Minne
Gasquet v. Lapeyre
GASQUET v. LAPEYRE ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 116. Argued November 16, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. The provision in § 9 of Article I of the Constitution guaranteeing the privilege of habeas corpus is
Hill v. Reynolds
HILL, A MINOR, ET AL. v. REYNOLDS, A MINOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 61. Argued November 2, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. A decision of the Secretary of the Interior adjudicating a contest over certain Choct
Savings Bank v. Loewe
SAVINGS BANK OF DANBURY, OF DANBURY, CONNECTICUT, v. LOEWE, AS SURVIVING PARTNER OF THE FIRM OF D. E. LOEWE & COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 713. Argued December 11, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917.
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Winters
MINNEAPOLIS & ST. LOUIS RAILROAD COMPANY v. WINTERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 420. Argued December 5, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. When a state court applies the Federal Employers’ Liability Act to an acti
Adamson v. Gilliland
ADAMSON v. GILLILAND. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 396. Submitted November 13, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. Upon considering the evidence the court finds grave reasons for agreeing with the Distri
McNaughton v. Johnson
McNAUGHTON v. JOHNSON, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA., No. 494. Argued December 12, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. The practice of fit
Crane v. Johnson
CRANE v. JOHNSON, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 493. Argued December. 12, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. The distinction made in
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. State Public Utilities Commission
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 148. Argued December 5, 1916. Decided January 8, 1917. An order of a state commission f
Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.
CLARK DISTILLING COMPANY v. WESTERN MARYLAND RAILWAY COMPANY AND STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. CLARK DISTILLING COMPANY v. AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY AND STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.