Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1917 Cases
256 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Buchanan v. Warley
BUCHANAN v. WARLEY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 33. Argued April 10, 11, 1916; restored to docket for reargument April 17,1916; reargued April 27, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. A city ordinance which forbid
Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. City of Louisville
FIDELITY & COLUMBIA TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTOR AND TRUSTEE OF EWALD, v. CITY OF LOUISVILLE. ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 424. Argued October 16, 17, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. A person domiciled in Kentucky-
Cohen v. Samuels
COHEN, TRUSTED IN BANKRUPTCY OF SAMUELS, v. SAMUELS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 359. Argued October 17, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. A policy of insurance held by a bankrupt, which has a cash s
Jones v. Interstate Commerce Commission
JONES v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME . COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 340. Argued October 3, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. Decided on the. authority of Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission, ante, 33.
Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission
SMITH v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 339. Argued October 3, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. Decided on the authority of Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission, ante, 33. Af
Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission
SMITH v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 337. Argued October 2, 3, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. The Senate, by resolution, directed the Interstate Commerce Commission to inve
Lee Wilson & Co. v. United States
LEE WILSON & COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE- CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 110. Argued October 4, 5, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. If, in the making of a survey of public lands, an area is through fraud o
Contributors to the Pennsylvania Hospital v. City of Philadelphia
CONTRIBUTORS TO THE PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 349. Argued October 16, 1917. Decided November 5, 1917. So vital a governmental power as the power, upon j
Bruce v. Tobin
BRUCE, ADMINISTRATOR OF TOBIN ET AL., v. TOBIN. PETITION FOR A WRIT OF .CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 645. Petition for a writ of certiorari submitted October 1, 1917. Denied October 22, 1917. The remedy
City of Chelsea v. City of Boston
No. 236. City of Chelsea, Plaintiff in Error, v. City of Boston. In error to the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts. Motion to dismiss submitted October 8, 1917. Decided October 15, 1917. Mr. Wilton J. Lambert, Mr.- Louis
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Towers
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY, LESSEE OF THE NORTHERN CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY, v. TOWERS ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP MARYLAND. No. 31. Argued April 25, 26, 19
United States v. Leary
UNITED STATES v. LEARY ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS OF LEARY, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 194. Argued October 4, 1917. Decided October 15, 1917. Where a defendant, under indictment for defrauding th
Ascarate v. New Mexico
No. 173. Ricardo Ascarate, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of New Mexico. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Néw Mexico. Motion to dismiss submitted October 1, 1917. Decided October 8, 1917. Mr. Edward C. Wade, Jr., for plaintiff in
Empire Mill Co. v. Blackwell Lumber Co.
No. 786. Empire Mill Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Blackwell Lumber Company. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho. Motion to dismiss or affirm or modify supersedeas submitted June 4, 1917. Decided June 11, 1917. Mr. Charles
Omaha Baum Iron Store Co. v. Moline Plow Co.
No. 1029. Omaha Baum Iron Store Co., Formerly Omaha Iron Store Co., Appellant, v. Moline Plow Company. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Motion to dismiss submitted June 4, 1917. Decided June
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
Nos. 1035, 1036, 1037, and 1038. Western Union Telegraph Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama. Motions to dismiss or affirm and petitions for writs of
Washington Railway & Electric Co. v. Scala
WASHINGTON RAILWAY & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. SCALA, ADMINISTRATRIX OF SCALA. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 826. Argued May 8, 1917. Decided June 11, 1917. The court has jurisdiction by writ of error to review th
American Express Co. v. South Dakota ex rel. Caldwell
AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY ET AL. v. STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA EX REL. CALDWELL, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, ET AL. EEEOE TO THE SUPEEME COUET OP THE STATE OP SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 902. Argued April 13, 1917. Decided June 11, 19
Adams v. Tanner
ADAMS ET AL. v. TANNER, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR' THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 273. Argued May 7, 1917. Decided June 11, 1917. The business of sec
McCoach v. Insurance Co. of North America
McCOACH, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA. CERTÍORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE . ■ THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 475. Argued March 14, 1917. Decided June 11, 1917. A fire and marine insurance company
Lanham v. McKeel
LANHAM, ADMINISTRATOR OF LANHAM, ET AL. v. McKEEL. EEEOE TO THE SUPEEME COUET OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 245. Submitted April 30, 1917 Decided June 11, 1917. An order of the Secretary of the Interior, approving an Indian agent’s recommen
Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. Reynolds
PUGET SOUND TRACTION, LIGHT & POWER COMPANY v. REYNOLDS ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 22
Southern Railway Co. v. Puckett
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. PUCKETT. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP GEORGIA. No. 219. Argued April 25, 1917. Decided June 11, 1917. A case arising under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, as amended April 5,1910, c. 143, 3
Darnell v. Edwards
DARNELL v. EDWARDS ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE MISSISSIPPI RAILROAD COMMISSION. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 216. Argued April 25, 1917. Decided June 11, 1917. In determining
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.